Lue C Fur
Evil member
Boy, you sure don't know squat about children.........!!!!!!!!!
But he is a Weiner expert.
Boy, you sure don't know squat about children.........!!!!!!!!!
Weiner Whizzes at Woodshmmmm.....klien did you have anything to do with this........Fan throws hot dog at Tiger Woods...
To say the poor aren't affected by the "999" plan is just complete ignorance or misunderstanding.
How can someone who is low income, who was paying a lower sales tax as it is ( say 4%) - now upped to 9% - losing 5% of their money on ALL ITEMS PURCHASED relative to before - food, clothing etc etc...
How is that a good thing? Do you think the poor can afford higher taxes, such as this one example?
Or a 9% tax when they were paying 0% federal tax before?
This whole plan smells like a shakedown of the poor, and the money is funneled right up to the wealthy . Without any real meat and potatoes, we can assume that is the premise and backbone.
We may be closer to a serious debate into some sort of "fair tax" than ever before. I can assure you that if Cain gets the nomination the numbers will begin to fly.The poor may not buy their big screens outright but they do rent them by the week. Did you ever notice that all of the rent-to-own stores like to set up shop next to military bases? When I was active duty our next door neighbors did the rent-to-own thing on a washer and dryer pair. They ended up spending just over $2K for a set that may have retailed for $700.
I like the Fair Tax. Like Tooner, I am not a huge consumer of goods, so this would benefit me on a personal level. I would take the $400 or so that I currently pay in taxes and put it all in to my 401k. I like the idea of the prebate. Unfortunately, we have been talking about the Fair Tax since 1999 and it is no closer to becoming reality.
I do understand sleeve meet heart, that you do not like this plan or this candidate. I will not stoop to the level of calling you ignorant or incapable of understanding. I think you simply have a different point of view. You do not understand mine, I do not understand yours.
1> They do not pay zero now, they pay between 13-15%, in the next yr they get it all back, thats when they pay zero. If you had ever been poor you would know that, its called the working poor. So for them I feel it will be better, they will only pay 9 on what they buy new. The poor arent really out there buying big screen TVS, etc, ( not the working poor).
minimum wage job, 400 a week, presently has about 80 taken away for fica, medicare,ss. Leaving them 320 for the week pretty tough.
same with the 9/9/9 400.00 - 9%=36
leaves them with 364.00, a little better, even if they now need to spend 150.00 on food and gas, thats another 13.50 in tax. And then they will get their prebate on the taxes they paid if they are under a certain income, so they will get it all back in one month not one yr.
Tooner,
I was speaking of the 47% of Americans who pay nothing for Federal and also the fact that most every state, except a few, will significantly increase their sales taxes.
The poor may not buy their big screens outright but they do rent them by the week. Did you ever notice that all of the rent-to-own stores like to set up shop next to military bases? When I was active duty our next door neighbors did the rent-to-own thing on a washer and dryer pair. They ended up spending just over $2K for a set that may have retailed for $700.
I like the Fair Tax. Like Tooner, I am not a huge consumer of goods, so this would benefit me on a personal level. I would take the $400 or so that I currently pay in taxes and put it all in to my 401k. I like the idea of the prebate. Unfortunately, we have been talking about the Fair Tax since 1999 and it is no closer to becoming reality.
Well some don't have the income to "pay in"...others do but fall under the lower-middle income (family of four near or under 50k), so the net result is sameThe 47% do not pay nothing--they have to pay in just like everyone else--they just get all of it back (and more) the following year.
Well some don't have the income to "pay in"...others do but fall under the lower-middle income (family of four near or under 50k), so the net result is same
My point was, does the 9-9-9 simplify the tax code and reduce deductions therefore the 47% will be paying more? Any proof it does not?
Oh thank you so much wienie sage...I never considered searching for articles on the internet.Do your research on net, but none of them are good reviews !
Here's a nice one :
Herman Cain’s 9-9-9 Tax Plan Dangerous Stuff
Do your research on net, but none of them are good reviews !
Here's a nice one :
Herman Cain’s 9-9-9 Tax Plan Dangerous Stuff
You do realize that under 9-9-9 or Fairtax you will no longer have a 401k, nor will you be able to right off the interest on your mortgage.
Last year my effective tax rate on income was 9.58% after factoring in all my tax breaks, even though my top marginal rate was 25%. Cain's plan would drop that to 9% but that drop would be more than offset by the 9% national sales tax, which would cost me close to another $1000.00 per year just on groceries. I would have paid more in taxes last year under 9-9-9 and my tax situation isn't that unusual.