Last. Best. Final.

The Range

In too deep
By the way, moderators - I can only give thumbs up. If I was bad in the past I don't apologize but I would like to have access to the same emoticons as my union brothers and sisters. Yes, hovering doesn't fix it. SOS
 

Bubblehead

My Senior Picture
Are you stupid or something? Did you not read my post? 25-hour starting wage here for seasonals + new hires. I make 25 an hour even though I've been here well north of a decade, less than seasonals + new hires when they do their attendance bonus union-busting bull:censored2:. 25 an hour part-time is not a liveable wage. In regards to full-time? Mind your business. If justice existed it would be the same work for the same pay but the spineless allowed the two-tier division to creep in decades ago. I can make 40 an hour part-time and it won't be a liveable wage, don't you worry mester.
Part-time vs Full-time is not a "tier", it's a radically different classification by design.

Seeking a "livable wage" from a part-time job may not be realistic, but in this very unique circumstance, getting full-time benefits is.

So really, why aren't you interested in going full-time at UPS?
 

The Range

In too deep
You have to go fulltime for that ……




I kid I kid.
yousonofabitchyou.gif
 
That's why I said maybe. I don't think they need it but honestly in my building they never show up. I thought a $25 top rate was more than generous and should be enough to get them to show up.
I think that's the big difference right now is a lot of these part-timers are not looking for a full-time career here
 

evilleace

Well-Known Member
I know that, and you know that but most 20 somethings don’t care. Once they were allowed to stay on insurance until 26 they don’t even think about it until then. A consequence of teaching adults not to be responsible for their self.

Honestly let them walk I'd rather have a late 20s early 30s PT with a family who needs the insurance and would show up everyday for it.
We need to sell the benefits to the potential workforce not the wage.
 

Emergency Conditions

Well-Known Member
Honestly let them walk I'd rather have a late 20s early 30s PT with a family who needs the insurance and would show up everyday for it.
We need to sell the benefits to the potential workforce not the wage.
The problem is the way we're structured currently we need far too many PTers to rely on that type of worker so unfortunately we have to fill the ranks with people who just need a job and don't care about the benefits because they're not planning on sticking around for long.
 

The Range

In too deep
Part-time vs Full-time is not a "tier", it's a radically different classification by design.

Seeking a "livable wage" from a part-time job may not be realistic, but in this very unique circumstance, getting full-time benefits is.

So really, why aren't you interested in going full-time at UPS?
What do you suggest? Decade+ part-timers make the same or less than seasonals and new hires, depending on how generous UPS is feeling with MRA and attendance bonuses. Good for them. They also make substantially more than new full-timers. "Radically different classification by design" seems like an excellent way to sew division.
 

Bubblehead

My Senior Picture
What do you suggest? Decade+ part-timers make the same or less than seasonals, depending on how generous UPS is feeling with MRA and attendance bonuses.
Do you have any idea what UPS pays weekly on your behalf for H&W, pension, in addition to your annual vacation bank, paid holidays, etc?

....and again really, why haven't you gone full-time at UPS in the past decade plus?

I have a point here if you will play along (if your reasoning isn't too personal).
 

The Range

In too deep
Do you have any idea what UPS pays weekly on your behalf for H&W, pension, in addition to your annual vacation bank, paid holidays, etc?

....and again really, why haven't you gone full-time at UPS in the past decade plus?
That's none of your business, with all due respect. Part-time ain't a crime. Secondly, you can divert attention to benefits, which I am fully aware of but it doesn't answer the questions "Why do seasonals and new hires make more than someone with e.g. 15 years" "Why does UPS pay $10/hour more post-MRA than what my union negotiated"? I think you are someone to be respected here if memory serves me correctly. With that said, I am glad you aren't negotiating for us. We ate those :censored2: sandwiches "but the benefits" for far too long under Mr. HOFFA. The attendance bonus was completely arbitrary. There were new hires with a year getting MRA, benefits, attendance bonus, and who knows what other goodies. Great for them, woe for your brothers and sisters that have time in.
 
Last edited:

Bubblehead

My Senior Picture
That's none of your business, with all due respect. Part-time ain't a crime. Secondly, you can divert attention to benefits, which I am fully aware of but it doesn't answer the questions "Why do seasonals and new hires make more than someone with e.g. 15 years" "Why does UPS pay $10/hour more post-MRA than what my union negotiated"?
Why haven't you gone full-time at UPS in the past decade plus?

I have a point here (seriously) if you will play along?

My apologies if your reasoning is personally sensitive.
 

evilleace

Well-Known Member
That's none of your business, with all due respect. Part-time ain't a crime. Secondly, you can divert attention to benefits, which I am fully aware of but it doesn't answer the questions "Why do seasonals and new hires make more than someone with e.g. 15 years" "Why does UPS pay $10/hour more post-MRA than what my union negotiated"?

Because those people are needed for a short time so it's hard to hire that way. Also they DON'T get benefits therefore they can make a little more. Simple fix would be no permanent PT makes less than a seasonal.
 
Top