Longshoremen’s Strike

Thebrownblob

Well-Known Member
Incomplete telling of history by leaving out the Three-fifths Compromise.
What’s incomplete about it? The founding fathers were not all racist. They were pragmatic. Knowing full well in the constitution it said all men were created equally and would eventually win out, as it did with the 14th amendment. The way you tell it our country should be dissolved because it’s racist from the start. Naturally your logic is flawed and twisted as usual.
 

Next Day Err

Well-Known Member
What’s incomplete about it? The founding fathers were not all racist. They were pragmatic. Knowing full well in the constitution it said all men were created equally and would eventually win out, as it did with the 14th amendment. The way you tell it our country should be dissolved because it’s racist from the start. Naturally your logic is flawed and twisted as usual.
I think you’re extrapolating way too much from what I’ve been trying to point out.
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
We embargoed Japan, provoking them to military action and we were attacking German ships while escorting British freighters a full year prior to their declaration against us

We knew exactly how both would respond, FDR wanted to get us into the war
We embargoed Japan because of their expansion in the Pacific, especially their treatment of China.

And were we defending the British ships we were escorting?
 

Thebrownblob

Well-Known Member
I had an uncle by marriage who was a complete loser. He even got booted out of the military ranks in boot camp in WWII for "an inability to follow orders" which greatly affected future employment. He was obnoxiously opinionated about everyone else being the source of his woes. Needless to say he was all in on being a Rush Ditto-head.
You guys seem to have a lot of common. Must run in the family.
 
Top