Thebrownblob
Well-Known Member
YesI pay the same amount of Union dues a month as a FT member with half the guaranteed hours. And you think this is fair?
YesI pay the same amount of Union dues a month as a FT member with half the guaranteed hours. And you think this is fair?
We can only assume you must think it is fair, having continued to do it for more than 30 years like you have.I pay the same amount of Union dues a month as a FT member with half the guaranteed hours. And you think this is fair?
Oh, as well as the multiple years and opportunities had to go full-time….We can only assume you must think it is fair, having continued to do it for more than 30 years like you have.
....just saying?
Dues allow the negotiations to negotiate the zero insurance fee.Dues have nothing to do with insurance. The company writes that check.
The union in these rtw states needs to find legal ways to make not joining less attractive. Perhaps non union surcharges on Teamcare? Are these workers in Teamcare?
Wonder if thry could still negotiate at half the current dues?Dues allow the negotiations to negotiate the zero insurance fee.
So while dues don’t pay your insurance, I’d gladly keep paying the dues to keep my me from paying $75/week for insurance alone.
What's the % against their annual net.For those who pay that much, that's about 1.4% annually by calculating it against their base 40 hour weekly guarantee alone.
Factor in overtime and it is much less.
Sounds like a pretty good deal to me for all the contractually negotiated benefits and protections that come with that minimal cost?
It is absolutely surprising and extremely shameful that any bargaining unit employee would feel justified in being a freeloading non-payer, let alone a top scale employee who's annual dues rate is likely less than 1% of their annual gross.
Haven’t done my taxes yet, vacation in two weeks. I will take it then, but they should be similar to last year. It was less than 1% of my gross and about 1.3% of my net.What's the % against their annual net.
No it's not fair that part time jobs exist at a union workplace. We need to phase them out of existence.I pay the same amount of Union dues a month as a FT member with half the guaranteed hours. And you think this is fair?
Something we agree on. The Teamsters and UPS should phase out all PT Union members and create all FT jobs paying at least top driver rate.No it's not fair that part time jobs exist at a union workplace. We need to phase them out of existence.
Sadly some people just don't have the work ethic to even want a full time job.
Keep dreaming buddy.Something we agree on. The Teamsters and UPS should phase out all PT Union members and create all FT jobs paying at least top driver rate.
No it's not fair that part time jobs exist at a union workplace. We need to phase them out of existence.
Sadly some people just don't have the work ethic to even want a full time job.
About this previous "loyalty and respect"......The simple fact is most of our jobs at UPS were designed for physical and mental attrition, what are the percentages for a new start to make it till retirement? Most do not even last a month let alone the 5 years to become vested in a pension that pays peanuts till one hits the magic number: 30 years and age 55.
Just wait till ones retires and see what kind of work environment we where in. (Boiled ) .. just look at our Union Members who have worked past 30..they are like zombies..capable of doing their assigned tasks but just waiting for someone or something to pull the plug..
There is no loyalty or respect from both sides. This was not the case before we all became a human resource. As long as our Union just does the bare minimum and fights for your job which no one wants anyway but fails to address the root causes, we are just watching a dog and pony show every 5 years…Different names but the same results.
Our management folk will continue to lose any chance of advancement, redundant positions are being eliminated… their pensions frozen… health benefits cut to the bone…They are paying the cost of their previous generation who were able to become millionaires at the operational levels. Simply not a good bargaining chip when you ask for more concessions from the Union.
Do you not Lycra at all? Or just certain items like bicycle shorts and such?I don't Lycra, but I support her on private unions.
View attachment 419533
There is a business to run. Yes?No it's not fair that part time jobs exist at a union workplace. We need to phase them out of existence.
Sadly some people just don't have the work ethic to even want a full time job.
If you want a part time job go work at McDonald's.There is a business to run. Yes?
What makes it unfair to have part-timers? Just because a union company? Serious question.
Work ethic and full time jobs.....one and the same?
Example: I started part-time. I was going to college so that worked out great. I was offered full-time. Great with all that means. Except......it set my college back YEARS. I worked as hard in both scenarios. So, depending......that sword cuts both ways. In school I loaded up on class hours. Full-time, I loaded up on work hours. What are you trying to do?
If you are here for the benefits.....doesn't mean you are lazy. MOF, far from it.
Lycra was her campaign manager. People are simple.Do you not Lycra at all? Or just certain items like bicycle shorts and such?
Probably pays more.If you want a part time job go work at McDonald's.
Who cares.Probably pays more.
I don't.I pay the same amount of Union dues a month as a FT member with half the guaranteed hours. And you think this is fair?
Just for kicks (this is net in regards to gross minus taxes - no retirement deductions included).What's the % against their annual net.