monte, it's hilarious where you decide who is "winning" an argument and who is giving quality statements and facts.
Amazing that it seems to just be you,
according to you.
Speed
is on the money, albeit not very diplomatic.
Ummm, monte you apparently are not aware that DHL is a spin off of the German Post Office that is still financially connected to it?
Perhaps you think the German Post Office is a relatively recent start up.
I know what market share is.
It's what UPS has and fedex wants.
It's what gets you the most revenue and packages (UPS far more than fedex in all it's various names, divisions and colors).
Losers and debt ridden companies concentrate their talk in terms of growing market share when they can't say they are leading an industry.
fedex has bought and is still trying to patch together a bunch of individual companies to try to pretend they have a real integrated system.
Stating that the approach is on purpose (rather than all that they could afford to do) and that they think a bunch of separate companies is more efficient (that have to uselessly replicate so many functions) is about as lame a spin as any fedex has tried, or perhaps that was just you.
"the debt is?? aircraft? hubs/stations? kinkos? parcel direct?"
Yep, sounds like you named most of it.
Defend your own company; I ain't doing it for you.
The saying, "if you can't run with the big dogs, stay on the porch" kind of fits here.
"Wannabee" rings a bell as well.
Course, that's just another name for "brown envy" where some poor sap spends his time on the competition's board because just dwelling on the number four company's board apparently only, engenders feelings of inadequacy.
You have to realize, you are the one with the brown envy from the fourth place debt ridden company coming onto a website of people from the cash rich, dominant, number one delivery company in the world.
Moreluck, point taken.