New Orleans..Terrorist Attack or Not ?

Over70irregs

Well-Known Member
Did you let her know that there’s drones that are using gravatic propulsion systems launched from the Atlantic Ocean by China?

I’m sure she would think you’re just as much of a nut as we do with your bitcoin posts.

By the way, I love Dollar tree.
That gravity stuff is interesting. Usually women are receptive. They take screenshots of this pic lately… The women TOTALLY Don’t know.. we are early
1736005409484.jpeg
 

Pullman Brown

Well-Known Member
It is interesting and I did watch some of it yesterday although I think they make more of it than it is, even if it’s true what does it even mean and how does it change anything? The way he went about the end of his life will make anything that was possibly true easily dismissed.

Even if it’s a 100% true, what could I, even we do about it lol?
Be prepared to meet your Maker!
 

Pullman Brown

Well-Known Member
Unpopular fact:

The reckless pursuit of corporate profit, stock market growth, and economic efficiency have aided and abetted in the gutting of American conservatism in particular and the West in general.

Brian Suave
 

Pullman Brown

Well-Known Member
Two Competing Narratives:

Matthew Livelsberger, a MAGA supporter, Green Beret with five Bronze Stars, special weapons expert, and drone technology specialist, for reasons likely related to a previous concussion (or possibly unrequited love), rented a bulletproof pickup, wired together a shoddy redneck explOsive device, drove to a Trump property, executed himself, posthumously set off the device (damaging the inside of the armored pickup, but not even breaking the glass doors it was parked next to).

OR:

Livelsberger wasn’t lying when he said in his email two days before his death that he was going whistleblow on UAP technology and U.S. war crimes, that the Feds were following him, and it was likely they’d make an end of him. Then, he was executed and sent to a Trump property (to frame him as a domestic terr0rist) in a self-driving, armored car when the amateur device designed *not* to destroy anything but the evidence, was det0nated remotely.

JD

Which was it?
 

MAKAVELI

Well-Known Member
Interesting interview.



Ryan is just using his platform to peddle conspiracy theories and enrich himself. Just another Alex Jones.
 

oldngray

nowhere special
The only reason Alex Jones is looked at so negatively is because of his hot (and awful) take on sandy hook. He's right far more often than he's wrong.
He tries to be controversial to get more attention but yeah he did go too far with Sandy Hook. He sometimes makes some good points but of course you always need to filter it with an eye towards his sensationalism.
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
He tries to be controversial to get more attention but yeah he did go too far with Sandy Hook. He sometimes makes some good points but of course you always need to filter it with an eye towards his sensationalism.
I remember guys here defending his take on Sandy Hook as if it truly was a staged event to get rid of guns. Influencers like Jones are dangerous because of the influence they have on the gullible.
 
Top