Non-Political Gun Talk (On topic)

Oh Shoot

Middle fingers up
30 cal M1 carbine i inherited
20241126_194308.jpg
20241126_194248.jpg
20241126_194103.jpg
20241126_194038.jpg
 

bbsam

Moderator
Staff member
Interesting ruling. As I understand it, if this judge’s ruling is upheld, the FOID act is difficult to uphold. How would Brown legally obtain a firearm if the ruling is that she legally owned it in her home? As the law stands now, she would have to illegally obtain the weapon to be able to have it in her home. That obviously makes no sense.
 

oldngray

nowhere special
Interesting ruling. As I understand it, if this judge’s ruling is upheld, the FOID act is difficult to uphold. How would Brown legally obtain a firearm if the ruling is that she legally owned it in her home? As the law stands now, she would have to illegally obtain the weapon to be able to have it in her home. That obviously makes no sense.
Makes a lot more sense than the obvious unconstitutional law Illinois tried to pass. Strike the FOID requirement and any question of legality goes away.
 

Lineandinitial

Legio patria nostra
Interesting ruling. As I understand it, if this judge’s ruling is upheld, the FOID act is difficult to uphold. How would Brown legally obtain a firearm if the ruling is that she legally owned it in her home? As the law stands now, she would have to illegally obtain the weapon to be able to have it in her home. That obviously makes no sense.
Are you assuming she purchased it in IL and the seller was required to verify the FOID before making the sale?
You know where I’m going.
I had a small arsenal that I’ve taken with me from state to state and I don’t read every dumb law they have on the books.
 
Top