I had been told by some older siblings that it would be a nice thing to do, since they had not .
Your older siblings beat you up alot, didn't they?
I had been told by some older siblings that it would be a nice thing to do, since they had not .
Speak for yourself. Some of us knew the war was a load of crap everytime Bush/Cheney and company (including democrats) came up with new reasons why we just "had" to go to war. Of course, we were called un-American but what we really were was right.
Atleast Romney hooked up with Trump, they share their favorites words : " You're Fired" !
. Tell me again how only spending cuts is the way to fix the economy.
"...no one can debate the fact that we were brought to our knees on that fateful day...". Oh, I think that is very debatable. What brings us to our knees is a half-assed commitment to wars where tax cuts are insisted upon and a draft is not. That is not a "war economy". That is trying to fight a war "on the cheap".As much as the Dems would like to, you can not compare Bush to BO. We were attacked on 9-11-01. We were headed toward a major recession or depression but a war economy happened. We can debate the merits of going to war but no one can debate the fact that we were brought to to our knees on that fateful day which put our country in war mode that had bi-partisan support.
Canada
It's about an 80-20 rescue record of companies that were definitely going out of business. So it's better to save some jobs than no jobs at all.
I think that is wrong because a bankruptcy still would have required a huge amount of money that no private equity company was willing to put up. With the government behind it, Detroit stood a chance and with a democrat in office the union's arm could be twisted. I don't think it could have happened any other way because Bain and other private equity companies weren't standing in line to get there. Had they been, Obama would have been happy to let things go that way. Remember, it wasn't a popular move.I think more GM jobs were lost and more dealerships closed WITH a bailout than would've been with just a bankruptcy reorganization. A reorgnization would've saved all that taxpayer money and have the same result.
They wouldn't have needed MY MONEY to go through bankruptcy.I think that is wrong because a bankruptcy still would have required a huge amount of money that no private equity company was willing to put up. With the government behind it, Detroit stood a chance and with a democrat in office the union's arm could be twisted. I don't think it could have happened any other way because Bain and other private equity companies weren't standing in line to get there. Had they been, Obama would have been happy to let things go that way. Remember, it wasn't a popular move.
Yeah, if that was true.
And spending cuts weren't only the way out, but also higher taxes (balanced approach - that you republicans refuse to do).
Without OUR money, they would have gone under and created a deeper mess. I'm glad they used OUR money.They wouldn't have needed MY MONEY to go through bankruptcy.
Without OUR money, they would have gone under and created a deeper mess. I'm glad they used OUR money.
They wouldn't have needed MY MONEY to go through bankruptcy.
There is no proof a "deeper mess" would have been created than the one the government created by their "bailout". If it would have been a good use of "our" money there would have been no need to use the force of government.
So where was Bain Capital? They probably considered it but found it too risky.