Sportello
Well-Known Member
That's the conclusion you reached?So you obviously believe that criminals obey laws.
I don't.
Yikes again.
That's the conclusion you reached?So you obviously believe that criminals obey laws.
I don't.
And yours is more gun laws?That's the conclusion you reached?
Yikes again.
You are never right.Let's get rid of all laws since criminals don't follow them. I doubt you could obtain a gun legally.
Let's get rid of all laws since criminals don't follow them.
All or nothing. If the republican mantra is gun laws don't work because criminals don't follow laws, then that would hold true for every law.I like it on the gun side. No sense in disarming the honest citizen and giving the thugs an advantage.
All or nothing. If the republican mantra is gun laws don't work because criminals don't follow laws, then that would hold true for every law.
Cognitive distortion.And yours is more gun laws?
How's that working out for you?
Cra cra.yea that was a tongue in cheek response, ridiculous response to ridiculous concept.
In reality greater enforcement of existing laws would be a good first step. instead every time we have some nut lose his mind and start shooting Obama comes up with some new legal action he wishes to take.
His actions like his tears are transparent and thus congress wont support his histrionics.
under a democratic utopia American citizens would not be able to own guns and criminals would be able to easily smuggle them across an open border to use against its defenseless citizenry.
That's easy.Maybe someone should list the mass shootings that would have been prevented with Odumbos new regulations.....I'll start you off....Sandyhook would not have been prevented.
Maybe someone should list the mass shootings that would have been prevented with Odumbos new regulations.....I'll start you off....Sandyhook would not have been prevented.
He was called salesman of the year on the NRA website a while back.If I owned a gun shop he would be on my favorite people list. Nobody drums up gun sales like Barry.
I didn't know the 2nd amendment pertains to criminals and mentally ill?That's easy.
None of the mass shootings would have been prevented.
This isn't about mass shootings.
It's about taking away the 2nd amendment, one law at a time.
Well if you can take it away from the criminals and mentally ill with out 1 iota of inconvenience to law abiding citizens, go for it.I didn't know the 2nd amendment pertains to criminals and mentally ill?
If one can pass a background check, they got nothing to worry about. It's hilarious that republicans want an ID to vote but want no " inconvenience" when it comes to buying a gun.Well if you can take it away from the criminals and mentally ill with out 1 iota of inconvenience to law abiding citizens, go for it.
But, if law abiding citizens now have to jump through more hoops to get a gun, hell no.
That clear enough for you Nancy?
The right of the people to keep and BEAR arms shall not be infringed.If one can pass a background check, they got nothing to worry about. It's hilarious that republicans want an ID to vote but want no " inconvenience" when it comes to buying a gun.