President Obama!

realbrown1

Annoy a liberal today. Hit them with facts.
Let's get rid of all laws since criminals don't follow them. I doubt you could obtain a gun legally.;)
You are never right.

Punish criminals with long prison terms.

And let good people carry protection where ever they go.

Is that really such a difficult concept for you to accept?

Because it is really easy for most people to understand.
 

newfie

Well-Known Member
All or nothing. If the republican mantra is gun laws don't work because criminals don't follow laws, then that would hold true for every law.

yea that was a tongue in cheek response, ridiculous response to ridiculous concept.

In reality greater enforcement of existing laws would be a good first step. instead every time we have some nut lose his mind and start shooting Obama comes up with some new legal action he wishes to take.

His actions like his tears are transparent and thus congress wont support his histrionics.

under a democratic utopia American citizens would not be able to own guns and criminals would be able to easily smuggle them across an open border to use against its defenseless citizenry.
 

Sportello

Well-Known Member
yea that was a tongue in cheek response, ridiculous response to ridiculous concept.

In reality greater enforcement of existing laws would be a good first step. instead every time we have some nut lose his mind and start shooting Obama comes up with some new legal action he wishes to take.

His actions like his tears are transparent and thus congress wont support his histrionics.

under a democratic utopia American citizens would not be able to own guns and criminals would be able to easily smuggle them across an open border to use against its defenseless citizenry.
Cra cra.
 

moreluck

golden ticket member
Maybe someone should list the mass shootings that would have been prevented with Odumbos new regulations.....I'll start you off....Sandyhook would not have been prevented.
 

realbrown1

Annoy a liberal today. Hit them with facts.
Maybe someone should list the mass shootings that would have been prevented with Odumbos new regulations.....I'll start you off....Sandyhook would not have been prevented.
That's easy.

None of the mass shootings would have been prevented.

This isn't about mass shootings.

It's about taking away the 2nd amendment, one law at a time.
 

wkmac

Well-Known Member
Thus the reason why The State is not the standard by which morality is set.

12417669_1148473415180326_8079299740808123071_n.jpg
 

realbrown1

Annoy a liberal today. Hit them with facts.
I didn't know the 2nd amendment pertains to criminals and mentally ill?:confused:
Well if you can take it away from the criminals and mentally ill with out 1 iota of inconvenience to law abiding citizens, go for it.

But, if law abiding citizens now have to jump through more hoops to get a gun, hell no.

That clear enough for you Nancy?
 

MAKAVELI

Well-Known Member
Well if you can take it away from the criminals and mentally ill with out 1 iota of inconvenience to law abiding citizens, go for it.

But, if law abiding citizens now have to jump through more hoops to get a gun, hell no.

That clear enough for you Nancy?
If one can pass a background check, they got nothing to worry about. It's hilarious that republicans want an ID to vote but want no " inconvenience" when it comes to buying a gun.;)
 

realbrown1

Annoy a liberal today. Hit them with facts.
If one can pass a background check, they got nothing to worry about. It's hilarious that republicans want an ID to vote but want no " inconvenience" when it comes to buying a gun.;)
The right of the people to keep and BEAR arms shall not be infringed.

Background checks are an infringement, and therefore unconstitutional.

Having to apply to get a concealed weapons permit is an infringement, and therefore unconstitutional.

Not being able to open carry everywhere is an infringement, and therefore unconstitutional.

In my opinion.
 
Top