Religion

[DriveInDriveOut]

Ttku

I can keep up just fine.

You came here in search of affirmation of your beliefs which deep down you question.

You won't find what you seek.

 

[BrownFlush]

I can keep up just fine.

You came here in search of affirmation of your beliefs which deep down you question.

You won't find what you seek.

Gaaa.
You know what someone is searching for. You know what one is questioning. And you know what one will find or not find.
Your powers are more than I even imagined!
SMH & LOL

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

Your powers are more than I even imagined!

Yes.

 

[floridays]

So that's your proof? You don't have a body? With that reasoning, James Hoffa could be your god.

I offered. Jesus was delivered to a grave. The grave is empty, where is his body? The most hated and loved human in the history of the world. Where is the delivered body?
Hoffa's body has never been produced for burial, likewise there is no concrete proof of his death.

 

[El Correcto]

Booo Christianity sucks.

Goodnight.

 

[BrownFlush]

Booo Christianity sucks.

Goodnight.

You're the professional.
Good morning.

 

[pickup]

You're not familiar with the book of Genesis apparently.

You’re referring to Genesis 6:1 and around there and sons of gods checking out the broads on earth and lusting after them and those broads having their progeny?

 

[pickup]

You’re referring to Genesis 6:1 and around there and sons of gods checking out the broads on earth and lusting after them and those broads having their progeny?

Oh I see I am late to the party. Is the discussion about how many angels can dance on the head of a pin still open?

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

You’re referring to Genesis 6:1 and around there and sons of gods checking out the broads on earth and lusting after them and those broads having their progeny?

Oh I see I am late to the party. Is the discussion about how many angels can dance on the head of a pin still open?

Aliens, obviously.

 

[BrownFlush]

Aliens, obviously.

Your linage in scripture.

 

[BrownFlush]

Aliens, obviously.

Dream on Drivel. Read it again and weep.
The “sons of God,” taking as their wives the “daughters of men” in Genesis 6:1-8?
Is this what you're driveling about?
The context of Genesis 6 leads to the conclusion that the “sons of God” mentioned in Genesis 6:2 were the descendants of Seth, the son of Adam (Gen. 4:25).
In Genesis 4 there are two families: (1) Cain and his descendants, and (2) Seth and his descendants. Cain’s descendants followed the pattern set by their father, Cain, and continued to live farther and farther away from God (Gen. 4:16-24).
In contrast, Seth and his family “began to call on the name of the Lord” (Gen. 4:26). Genesis 5 records this family tree all the way to Noah (Gen. 5:32).
Genesis 6:1-8 tells us how the world became so wicked and vile that God determined to destroy sinful man (which he did with the flood). This occurred because those whose ancestors had previously “called upon the name of the Lord” began to compromise and cohabit with the “daughters of men” (that is, the men and their families who did not call upon the name of the Lord).
They abandoned their spiritual heritage and “took wives for themselves of all whom they chose” (Gen. 6:2). When men began to be driven by their own lustful desires rather than the word and will of God they were influenced by the evil they grew to love.
The result was a world full of violent attackers, robbers, and tyrants (Gen. 6:4 says “giants” which is translated from a word which means “to fall upon” or attack) rather than one filled with people who “called upon the name of the Lord.”
These men made a name for themselves among other men, but not in eyes of the Lord (Gen. 6:4). It was Noah, a just man who walked with God who caught God’s attention and obtained God’s favor (Gen. 6:8-9).
The divine reaction to the wickedness of men was one of grief, sorrow, and ultimately judgment (Gen. 6:3, 5-7). God determined to destroy the earth and accomplished their punishment with the great flood (Gen. 6:13, 17; 7:1).

There is no compelling reason from context or the rest of the Bible to convince us that the “sons of God” in Genesis 6:2 were heavenly creatures instead of human beings. Such is the stuff of human fancy and fiction and Drivel. There is no basis for this view in the inspired text.
The “angels who sinned” in 2 Peter 2:4 cannot be the “sons of God” of Genesis 6:2 because those angels were “cast down to hell and delivered into chains (pits, ASV) of darkness.”
They were not sent to the earth (see also Jude 6).

So, the “sons of God” in Genesis 6:2 were men who did not remain holy and separated from the sin that was around them. Instead, they married women who influenced them to forsake righteous living. The result was mankind’s ruin and destruction.

 

[Jones]

Dream on Drivel. Read it again and weep.
The “sons of God,” taking as their wives the “daughters of men” in Genesis 6:1-8?
Is this what you're driveling about?
The context of Genesis 6 leads to the conclusion that the “sons of God” mentioned in Genesis 6:2 were the descendants of Seth, the son of Adam (Gen. 4:25).
In Genesis 4 there are two families: (1) Cain and his descendants, and (2) Seth and his descendants. Cain’s descendants followed the pattern set by their father, Cain, and continued to live farther and farther away from God (Gen. 4:16-24).
In contrast, Seth and his family “began to call on the name of the Lord” (Gen. 4:26). Genesis 5 records this family tree all the way to Noah (Gen. 5:32).
Genesis 6:1-8 tells us how the world became so wicked and vile that God determined to destroy sinful man (which he did with the flood). This occurred because those whose ancestors had previously “called upon the name of the Lord” began to compromise and cohabit with the “daughters of men” (that is, the men and their families who did not call upon the name of the Lord).
They abandoned their spiritual heritage and “took wives for themselves of all whom they chose” (Gen. 6:2). When men began to be driven by their own lustful desires rather than the word and will of God they were influenced by the evil they grew to love.
The result was a world full of violent attackers, robbers, and tyrants (Gen. 6:4 says “giants” which is translated from a word which means “to fall upon” or attack) rather than one filled with people who “called upon the name of the Lord.”
These men made a name for themselves among other men, but not in eyes of the Lord (Gen. 6:4). It was Noah, a just man who walked with God who caught God’s attention and obtained God’s favor (Gen. 6:8-9).
The divine reaction to the wickedness of men was one of grief, sorrow, and ultimately judgment (Gen. 6:3, 5-7). God determined to destroy the earth and accomplished their punishment with the great flood (Gen. 6:13, 17; 7:1).

There is no compelling reason from context or the rest of the Bible to convince us that the “sons of God” in Genesis 6:2 were heavenly creatures instead of human beings. Such is the stuff of human fancy and fiction and Drivel. There is no basis for this view in the inspired text.
The “angels who sinned” in 2 Peter 2:4 cannot be the “sons of God” of Genesis 6:2 because those angels were “cast down to hell and delivered into chains (pits, ASV) of darkness.”
They were not sent to the earth (see also Jude 6).

So, the “sons of God” in Genesis 6:2 were men who did not remain holy and separated from the sin that was around them. Instead, they married women who influenced them to forsake righteous living. The result was mankind’s ruin and destruction.

You sound like some street corner lunatic. Good grief...

 

[BrownFlush]

You sound like some street corner lunatic. Good grief...

Not at all.
Some explanation of texts take more than a line or two.
Read it or don't .
Go with its " aliens, obviously "..whatever you want.

 

[BrownFlush]

 

[El Correcto]

Boo god sucks, good night.

 

[El Correcto]

Dream on Drivel. Read it again and weep.
The “sons of God,” taking as their wives the “daughters of men” in Genesis 6:1-8?
Is this what you're driveling about?
The context of Genesis 6 leads to the conclusion that the “sons of God” mentioned in Genesis 6:2 were the descendants of Seth, the son of Adam (Gen. 4:25).
In Genesis 4 there are two families: (1) Cain and his descendants, and (2) Seth and his descendants. Cain’s descendants followed the pattern set by their father, Cain, and continued to live farther and farther away from God (Gen. 4:16-24).
In contrast, Seth and his family “began to call on the name of the Lord” (Gen. 4:26). Genesis 5 records this family tree all the way to Noah (Gen. 5:32).
Genesis 6:1-8 tells us how the world became so wicked and vile that God determined to destroy sinful man (which he did with the flood). This occurred because those whose ancestors had previously “called upon the name of the Lord” began to compromise and cohabit with the “daughters of men” (that is, the men and their families who did not call upon the name of the Lord).
They abandoned their spiritual heritage and “took wives for themselves of all whom they chose” (Gen. 6:2). When men began to be driven by their own lustful desires rather than the word and will of God they were influenced by the evil they grew to love.
The result was a world full of violent attackers, robbers, and tyrants (Gen. 6:4 says “giants” which is translated from a word which means “to fall upon” or attack) rather than one filled with people who “called upon the name of the Lord.”
These men made a name for themselves among other men, but not in eyes of the Lord (Gen. 6:4). It was Noah, a just man who walked with God who caught God’s attention and obtained God’s favor (Gen. 6:8-9).
The divine reaction to the wickedness of men was one of grief, sorrow, and ultimately judgment (Gen. 6:3, 5-7). God determined to destroy the earth and accomplished their punishment with the great flood (Gen. 6:13, 17; 7:1).

There is no compelling reason from context or the rest of the Bible to convince us that the “sons of God” in Genesis 6:2 were heavenly creatures instead of human beings. Such is the stuff of human fancy and fiction and Drivel. There is no basis for this view in the inspired text.
The “angels who sinned” in 2 Peter 2:4 cannot be the “sons of God” of Genesis 6:2 because those angels were “cast down to hell and delivered into chains (pits, ASV) of darkness.”
They were not sent to the earth (see also Jude 6).

So, the “sons of God” in Genesis 6:2 were men who did not remain holy and separated from the sin that was around them. Instead, they married women who influenced them to forsake righteous living. The result was mankind’s ruin and destruction.

 

[El Correcto]

God sounds like a homophobic genocidal dick on a power trip. Who ever wrote that non sense and was like yeah, this god deserves to be praised is a psychopath.

 

[BrownFlush]

You're right, go with "aliens obviously".
Or whatever you think will be fine.

 

[BrownFlush]

God sounds like a homophobic genocidal dick on a power trip. Who ever wrote that non sense and was like yeah, this god deserves to be praised is a psychopath.

You see homophobic in that statement? LOL.
You've sucked till you're silly.

 

[BrownFlush]

God sounds like a homophobic genocidal dick on a power trip. Who ever wrote that non sense and was like yeah, this god deserves to be praised is a psychopath.

On second thought, you get all this out of that meme and @Jones thinks I'm the one who sounds like a street corner lunatic ? LOL & SMH