Religion

[Integrity]

I’m not the one making the statement.
I’m just repeating facts to you and you’re making statements like “scripture proves”.
Scripture doesn’t prove anything, it has been proven wrong.

You’re the one not capable of a stable conversation because you think unverifiable religious claims are evidence even when these claims go against everything we know about reality.

It’s why you’re a silly person that can’t admit dinosaurs and human beings didn’t live at the same time, an absolute verifiable fact.

In theory only.

 

[Integrity]

The Scripture proves everything.
I admit what is written there.

That is your theory.

 

[BrownFlush]

You’re welcome.

Glad to see that you are becoming open to the leading of the Holy Spirit.

Yeah..He just literally told me you were an idiot.

 

[El Correcto]

In theory only.

I can’t tell if you’re joking or really don’t know what the word theory means. Do I need to post the YouTube children’s cartoon again?

 

[BrownFlush]

That is your theory.

Can't prove theory.
I can prove what's written.

 

[Integrity]

Yeah..He just literally told me you were an idiot.

Awesome! Finally you have heard His voice.

It wasn’t an audible voice was it?

 

[BrownFlush]

Awesome! Finally you have heard His voice.

It wasn’t an audible voice was it?

He was laughing so hard I barley made it out.

 

[Integrity]

Can't prove theory.
I can prove what's written.

That is a fine theory.

Have at it.

 

[Integrity]

I can’t tell if you’re joking or really don’t know what the word theory means. Do I need to post the YouTube children’s cartoon again?

Don’t think it will change my view but you can repost it if you want.

 

[BrownFlush]

That is a fine theory.

Have at it.

I can prove what's written is a theory?

 

[Integrity]

He was laughing so hard I barley made it out.

Was it an audible laugh?

 

[Integrity]

I can prove what's written is a theory?

The idea that you can prove what is written is a theory. In my view at least.

 

[El Correcto]

Don’t think it will change my view but you can repost it if you want.

I’m not even discussing a theory right now, I’m discussing facts and observations that form a theory. The fact that dinosaurs died off long before humans is not a theory, that is a fact contributing to a theory.

There isn’t gonna be new evidence or whatever else that leads to a 60 million year gap being closed. Please don’t encourage this delusional individual with your semantics.

 

[Integrity]

I’m not even discussing a theory right now, I’m discussing facts and observations that form a theory. The fact that dinosaurs died off long before humans is not a theory, that is a fact contributing to a theory.

There isn’t gonna be new evidence or whatever else that leads to a 60 million year gap being closed. Please don’t encourage this delusional individual with your semantics.

Don’t worry.

My input is not going to change the new earth, old earth debate and the theories behind the evidence that each side of the debate claims as factual and proven.

 

[El Correcto]

Don’t worry.

My input is not going to change the new earth, old earth debate and the theories behind the evidence that each side of the debate claims as factual and proven.

It isn’t a claim, your Bible and beliefs in god are claims, this is a fact, an absolute undeniable fact. Like I said we are not discussing a “theory” we are discussing a fact right now.

The fact that dinosaurs and human beings did not live at the same time and that there is a huge gap between them and us.

 

[Integrity]

It isn’t a claim, your Bible and beliefs in god are claims, this is a fact, an absolute undeniable fact. Like I said we are not discussing a “theory” we are discussing a fact right now.

The fact that dinosaurs and human beings did not live at the same time and that there is a huge gap between them and us.

There are assumptions behind your claim of this fact, no?

 

[El Correcto]

There are assumptions behind your claim of this fact, no?

No this isn’t based on assumptions.
Just like the word theory you people toss around dismissively or call anything you don’t like, assumption doesn’t mean what you think it means either.

 

[El Correcto]

An assumption would be someone that claims they have a connection with an unprovable deity beyond human comprehension.
They are assuming that, they have no proof and cannot back it up.

 

[Integrity]

No this isn’t based on assumptions.
Just like the word theory you people toss around dismissively or call anything you don’t like, assumption doesn’t mean what you think it means either.
View attachment 473927

What you are basing this on is infallible?

 

[Integrity]

An assumption would be someone that claims they have a connection with an unprovable deity beyond human comprehension.
They are assuming that, they have no proof and cannot back it up.

Experience and testimony is enough for me.