Religion

[DriveInDriveOut]

I crap bigger than you are.

wut

 

[floridays]

That's the great part about biblical text. You can take any passage you want and use it to support any point of view you want.

That is the exact reason it is to be taken in the whole. Taken in the whole, you can't.

 

[floridays]

Took me 20 minutes to write it DrivelDipstick. Slow typer.
It's more of a load than you want. Gen.6 has nothing to do with angels procreating.
No BS Evangelical. Just a Christian . Don't have it all figured out, but I do use scripture to answer bible questions.
Twist to my liking? Maybe to your unliking.
Historical context ? Can't go back much further Gen. 4.
All I use is what is canonical. If it's not in the 66 books, I can't discuss it.

Simplicity of the gospel, no reason to argue all of this anyway.

 

[BrownFlush]

Simplicity of the gospel, no reason to argue all of this anyway.

Making a point with somebody that is argumentative (DrivelInDrivelOut) isn't arguing , FlorMan
This is not the gospel of your salvation friend. This is Genesis 6.
"Written for our learning ..." ( Rom. 15:4 )

 

[BrownFlush]

It would be something else.
Religion is just an reason/excuse to take from others.

It would be something else I guess.
But not take MouseMan...Give to others..not take.

 

[It will be fine]

2 ItWillBeFine Chapter 3 verse 2

Chapter 7 verse 3. @me next time.

 

[Old Man Jingles]

It would be something else I guess.
But not take MouseMan...Give to others..not take.

Within that context it was why one tyrant attacks another tyrant or one head of a country attacks another country.
I agree, churches give back to the community and the needy.
Even more before our government and others became Socialist in nature.
Now, especially in the urban areas, the Government is suppose to take care of everyone from birth to death.

 

[BrownFlush]

Chapter 7 verse 3. @me next time.

A book about an atheist doesn't take 7 chapters.

 

[Old Man Jingles]

A book about an atheist doesn't take 7 chapters.

A book about an atheist doesn't take any chapters.

 

[BrownFlush]

A book about an Atheist doesn't take any chapters.

Chapter One : In the beginning there was nothing.
Chapter Two : Then something came from nothing.
Chapter Three: Then billions and billions and billions of years went by and the something that came from nothing evolved into something more.
Chapter Four: Chapters one thru three are scientific fact.
Chapter Five : If you don't believe this, you believe in fairy tales.

 

[BrownFlush]

Within that context it was why one tyrant attacks another tyrant or one head of a country attacks another country.
I agree, churches give back to the community and the needy.
Even more before our government and others became Socialist in nature.
Now, especially in the urban areas, the Government is suppose to take care of everyone from birth to death.

The mentality of the generation on the scene now sure seems ripe for it.

 

[Old Man Jingles]

Chapter One : In the beginning there was nothing.
Chapter Two : Then something came from nothing.
Chapter Three: Then billions and billions and billions of years went by and the something that came from nothing evolved into something more.
Chapter Four: Chapters one thru three are scientific fact.
Chapter Five : If you don't believe this, you believe in fairy tales.

A real atheist doesn't care and there is no story.
They don't talk about it, they don't write about it ... they don't care about what you think.
There is no chapter ... maybe one footnote.
So called Atheists that go out of their way to argue about it and make comments when a religious person makes a religious comment are not atheists.

 

[BrownFlush]

A real atheist doesn't care and there is no story.
They don't talk about it, they don't write about it ... they don't care about what you think.
There is no chapter ... maybe one footnote.
So called Atheists that go out of their way to argue about it and make comments when a religious person makes a religious comment are not atheists.

Theories and scientists come and go but Genesis 1 remains the same. And if you won't have Genesis 1, try Acts 17:24-25. When the last leaves of the last winter falls on the grave of the last theory... these passages will still read:
"In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth." And, "God who made the world and all things therein-gave to all life and breath and all things."

 

[Old Man Jingles]

Theories and scientists come and go but Genesis 1 remains the same. And if you won't have Genesis 1, try Acts 17:24-25. When the last leaves of the last winter falls on the grave of the last theory... these passages will still read:
"In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth." And, "God who made the world and all things therein-gave to all life and breath and all things."

Thanks for the offer.
However, I don't consider that significant or even relevant to my relationship with my Higher Power ... Jesus.

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

Theories and scientists come and go but Genesis 1 remains the same

No it doesn't.

 

[BrownFlush]

No it doesn't.

Your point?

 

[Old Man Jingles]

Your point?

If you are waiting on a point from that Joker, you are gonna be disappointed.

 

[BrownFlush]

Thanks for the offer.
However, I don't consider that significant or even relevant to my relationship with my Higher Power ... Jesus.

Always liked this one---
" The fool says in his heart, There is no God." ( Psalm 14:1 )

 

[Old Man Jingles]

Always liked this one---
" The fool says in his heart, There is no God." ( Psalm 14:1 )

I like this one, “The scribes and the Pharisees sit on Moses’ seat, but not the works they do. For they preach, but do not practice. They tie up heavy burdens, hard to bear, and lay them on people’s shoulders, but they themselves are not willing to move them with their finger. They do all their deeds to be seen by others. For they make their phylacteries broad and their fringes long, love the place of honor at feasts and the best seats in the synagogues, greetings in the marketplaces and being called rabbi by others.

 

[BrownFlush]

I like this one, “The scribes and the Pharisees sit on Moses’ seat, but not the works they do. For they preach, but do not practice. They tie up heavy burdens, hard to bear, and lay them on people’s shoulders, but they themselves are not willing to move them with their finger. They do all their deeds to be seen by others. For they make their phylacteries broad and their fringes long, love the place of honor at feasts and the best seats in the synagogues, greetings in the marketplaces and being called rabbi by others.

The Pharisees were hypocritical because they claimed to be interested in the details of the law, but ignored it when it didn't suit their purposes.
Jesus said, "But woe unto you Pharisees! for ye tithe mint and rue and every herb, and pass over justice and the love of God: but these you ought to have done.....
They liked to appear "righteous," but, justice and love were not part of their armor. When men today profess to be interested in God's law, but lie, they are demonstrating Pharisaical hypocrisy.