Rittenhouse Trial

oldngray

nowhere special
I'd be shocked if the judge declared a mistrial without prejudice, which would allow for a re-trial. Way too much obvious and desperate :censored2:ery coming from the prosecuting attorney because they've got nothing.
With the crap going on again today there is a much stronger chance of a mistrial with prejudice
 

Babagounj

Strength through joy
The Judge really wants this trial to be decided by the jury.
They have witnessed the prosecutor's actions and are fully aware that the state has no case.
 
Last edited:

oldngray

nowhere special
The Judge really wants this trial to be decided by the jury.
They have witnessed the prosecutor actions and are fully aware that the state has no case.
The judge knows he will be the scapegoat if he declares a mistrial but the misconduct by the prosecution is continuing and forcing his hand.
 

Babagounj

Strength through joy
The judge knows he will be the scapegoat if he declares a mistrial but the misconduct by the prosecution is continuing and forcing his hand.
The Judge should start holding the prosecutor in contempt.
( to find someone guilty of showing disrespect or disobedience to the judge or procedures of a court )
After a few times of doing this , then declare a mistrial with prejudice.
And publicly stating that the prosecutor caused it.
 

Fred's Myth

Nonhyphenated American
The Judge should start holding the prosecutor in content.
( to find someone guilty of showing disrespect or disobedience to the judge or procedures of a court )
After a few times of doing this , then declare a mistrial with prejudice.
And publicly stating that the prosecutor caused it.
contempt
 
He needs a mistrial to save his :censored2:.
With a mistrial , he can blame it all on the Judge, thus saving his career.
A mistrial, declared as such based on him introducing character, or any other type of inadmissible evidence, will solely be his responsibility, especially after being warned. He could not blame the judge and could potentially be disbarred. In his book, he could blame the judge for not allowing evidence, but not for his inappropriate line of questioning. He's a DA in Wisconsin, his career is going to be fine, he's not a high profile defense attorney :censored2:ting the bed on national TV.
 

UnionStrong

Sorry, but I don’t care anymore.
A mistrial, declared as such based on him introducing character, or any other type of inadmissible evidence, will solely be his responsibility, especially after being warned. He could not blame the judge and could potentially be disbarred. In his book, he could blame the judge for not allowing evidence, but not for his inappropriate line of questioning. He's a DA in Wisconsin, his career is going to be fine, he's not a high profile defense attorney :censored2:ting the bed on national TV.
He looks like a prick too
 

Babagounj

Strength through joy
A mistrial, declared as such based on him introducing character, or any other type of inadmissible evidence, will solely be his responsibility, especially after being warned. He could not blame the judge and could potentially be disbarred. In his book, he could blame the judge for not allowing evidence, but not for his inappropriate line of questioning. He's a DA in Wisconsin, his career is going to be fine, he's not a high profile defense attorney :censored2:ting the bed on national TV.
Even lowly DAs , need a good rep to migrate over to the private sector once they end their public life.
 

cachmeifucan

Well-Known Member
Yes we are. And allowing the jury to be swayed with the victim’s past. Rittenhouse wasn’t in danger of being molested, was he?
Never know the pedo may have had parole conditions and Kyle was 17. Kyle is a hero. Im getting 1 firework if he is found not guilty. God bless America
 

bbsam

Moderator
Staff member
1636674080047.jpeg

Kyle bored with the prosecution.

1636674237627.jpeg

Kyle using the “Balling Like A Bitch” defense.
 
Top