Rittenhouse Trial

[bbsam]

They would if he had shot black guys.

Nah. They would if Trump were still president.

 

[UnionStrong]

Exactly what did the guys who Rittenhouse shot do that might determine they were the good guys?

Nothing. It’s gonna come down to whether or not Kyle was genuinely in fear for his life and if it can be proven.

 

[bbsam]

Exactly what did the guys who Rittenhouse shot do that might determine they were the good guys?

If you’re the prosecutor, they got shot when chasing a young punk vigilante who had no business running around with an assault rifle.

See? Semantics.

 

[UnionStrong]

If you’re the prosecutor, they got shot when chasing a young punk vigilante who had no business running around with an assault rifle.

See? Semantics.

Would you chase an armed man? I hope not.

 

[vantexan]

Nah. They would if Trump were still president.

Well, that's true, it was all about getting Trump booted by any means necessary. Thank God y'all replaced him with a competent leader.

 

[bbsam]

Well, that's true, it was all about getting Trump booted by any means necessary. Thank God y'all replaced him with a competent leader.

I don’t think I’ve seen a competent leader since Obama. Joe was just the lesser of two evils.

 

[oldngray]

If you’re the prosecutor, they got shot when chasing a young punk vigilante who had no business running around with an assault rifle.

See? Semantics.

Prosecutor can lie. Too bad the facts don't support his claims.

This is a case that should have never gone to trial. Open and shut self defense. But they had to charge (without evidence) to appease their base.

 

[UnionStrong]

I don’t think I’ve seen a competent leader since Obama. Joe was just the lesser of two evils.

No look where we’re at.

 

[UnionStrong]

I don’t think I’ve seen a competent leader since Obama. Joe was just the lesser of two evils.

Obama? Plenty of competent and honest black men could be president but he wasn’t one of them. He set race relations back 20 years and did NADA for his people. If he did I never saw it. Free cellphones?

 

[vantexan]

If you’re the prosecutor, they got shot when chasing a young punk vigilante who had no business running around with an assault rifle.

See? Semantics.

That rifle was put into his hands by a business owner who had already had a couple of businesses burned down by rioters. When the attackers started that fire did Rittenhouse shoot them? No, he attempted to put it out AT A GAS STATION. That enraged the attackers, who attacked him, causing him to flee. They cornered him, attacked him, got their asses shot off. Case closed.

 

[bbsam]

Would you chase an armed man? I hope not.

I hope the defense doesn’t use that argument. That doesn’t really work well for them. Kinda suggests the armed man was a vigilante out of his depth and not really knowing what the hell he was doing.

Which is what the prosecution is attempting to show.

 

[bbsam]

Obama?

Far more than Trump. Yes.

 

[vantexan]

I don’t think I’ve seen a competent leader since Obama. Joe was just the lesser of two evils.

Obama had his issues, but I'll take him over Biden 100,000 times over.

 

[UnionStrong]

Far more than Trump. Yes.

Doubtful

 

[UnionStrong]

I hope the defense doesn’t use that argument. That doesn’t really work well for them. Kinda suggests the armed man was a vigilante out of his depth and not really knowing what the hell he was doing.

Which is what the prosecution is attempting to show.

We’ll see

 

[bbsam]

That rifle was put into his hands by a business owner who had already had a couple of businesses burned down by rioters. When the attackers started that fire did Rittenhouse shoot them? No, he attempted to put it out AT A GAS STATION. That enraged the attackers, who attacked him, causing him to flee. They cornered him, attacked him, got their asses shot off. Case closed.

If the defense can tell the story, maybe he walks. As @UnionStrong said, once it goes to the jury, all bets are off.

 

[vantexan]

I hope the defense doesn’t use that argument. That doesn’t really work well for them. Kinda suggests the armed man was a vigilante out of his depth and not really knowing what the hell he was doing.

Which is what the prosecution is attempting to show.

Rittenhouse 3, Attackers 0. The kid should go into the Special Forces.

 

[bbsam]

Doubtful

It’s opinion. Of course it’s doubtful.

 

[bbsam]

Rittenhouse 3, Attackers 0. The kid should go into the Special Forces.

That dough boy? Lol. No. I don’t think so.

 

[vantexan]

If the defense can tell the story, maybe he walks. As @UnionStrong said, once it goes to the jury, all bets are off.

Unless they stacked the jury with Leftists who want to convict him no matter what then he walks. Tell me again how many are being tried and convicted for all those murdered in the 2020 summer riots?