Rittenhouse Trial

V

vantexan

Well-Known Member
BMWMC said:
Well, this isn't the first argument based on a false premise, which included a complete out of contexts line of reasoning, attempting to rewrite the facts to suit a cognitive biases.
The officer at the Capitol faced, all alone, a violent and belligerent mob smashing down a door which lead directly to the congressional legislature and staff he is sworn and has a duty to protect from both parties, as they were narrowing attempting an escape. He had to stop the breaching long enough for them to evacuate. Ashley Babbitt put here own life at risk and no one has ever said she wouldn't have, if successful, open the doors and allowed the mob to reach the congress and it's staff.

Rittenhouse, a self proclaimed humanitarian, training to be an EMT, brought a high powered semi-automatic rifle with multiple round clips to a protest over another, shoot first ask questions later police shooting of blackman, and killed 3 people and wound 2 other. The only person to do that on that day. Not even the police who has the official duty to maintain the peace shot, wounded or killed anyone.

Rittenhouse didn't go there to render medical or humanitarian assistance. He went there to become a combatant. Radicalized by right-wing media which glorifies guns and ethnic social and political repression, to engage protesters with that high powered weapon capable of mass casualties.
Rittenhouse house went there to become a hero. He wanted to post himself on social media as a hero to the cause. That's was his strategy and it's payoff.

Your line of reasoning does fit the fact as they have been presented.
Click to expand...
Your facts aren't straight. Rittenhouse shot three, killing two. And the cop who shot Babbitt wasn't alone. There were other Capitol police there. And Rittenhouse only shot the people who were attacking him. Sorry, your flights of fantasy are just that.
 
B

Box Ox

Well-Known Member
vantexan said:
Your mom got you, so there's that...
Click to expand...

Alright! Ready for some "Your momma" drama!

cat-ate-popcorn-kernels.jpeg
 
zubenelgenubi

zubenelgenubi

I'm a star
vantexan said:
How do you determine that was his intent?
Click to expand...

You can't now, all that needs to be determined is if the defendants had a reasonable suspicion that he had committed a felony in order for the law to protect their right to attempt to arrest. That will be for the jury to decide, until then, we have to presume they did have a reasonable suspicion.
 

Similar threads

728ups
Alex Jones ordered to pay nearly a BILLION dollars to the families of Sandy Hook victims
15 16 17
Replies
328
Views
17K
Commercial Inside Release
Commercial Inside Release
B
Ya boy is in Brown! Career and Union speedrun
3 4 5
Replies
92
Views
2K
IVE GOTTA PACKAGE 4U
IVE GOTTA PACKAGE 4U
B
To Hell in a hand basket because of Progressives.
2 3 4
Replies
64
Views
5K
BrownFlush
B
T
CRY ME A RIVER LEBRON , All the way to the Bank !!!
2
Replies
21
Views
2K
Fido
Fido
A
This guy said you all lucky to have a job!
2
Replies
33
Views
5K
Zowert
Zowert
Top