Rittenhouse Trial

Netsua 3:16

AND THAT’S THE BOTTOM LINE
Wouldn't have been murder. He would have been the 4th guy Kyle had shot in self-defense.

And I think anyone who has watched the video of what happened that night and still thinks the 2 guys who were killed were murdered must either have sub-Forrest Gump IQ levels or are just denying reality as members of team hard left extremist.
I should have said killing. You are trying so hard to make sense of these idiots and turn this into some sort of social justice thing.
Your masters, both Democrat and Republican are soooooo proud.
Just a bunch of idiots playing stupid games and winning stupid prizes
It’s a complete waste of your time, bud
 

KCJr-Phx

Well-Known Member
I never was expecting a guilty verdict. This society will always give white ppl the benefit of the doubt. Now if he was a black 17 yr old with a gun we would be hearing why does a teenager have a gun. He needs to be put away. Where was his parents.
 

zubenelgenubi

I'm a star
I never was expecting a guilty verdict. This society will always give white ppl the benefit of the doubt. Now if he was a black 17 yr old with a gun we would be hearing why does a teenager have a gun. He needs to be put away. Where was his parents.

You haven't heard that in this case? That's 60% of what I've heard. Lol.
 

wilberforce15

Well-Known Member
I never was expecting a guilty verdict. This society will always give white ppl the benefit of the doubt. Now if he was a black 17 yr old with a gun we would be hearing why does a teenager have a gun. He needs to be put away. Where was his parents.
When was the last time a 17 year old black male with a gun shot someone while defending himself?
 

Box Ox

Well-Known Member
I should have said killing. You are trying so hard to make sense of these idiots and turn this into some sort of social justice thing.
Your masters, both Democrat and Republican are soooooo proud.
Just a bunch of idiots playing stupid games and winning stupid prizes
It’s a complete waste of your time, bud

I'm just watching the hard leftists dance as the facts of the case are presented.

Kyle shouldn't have even been there. But he was. And he was armed. And he shot the people who attacked him. It's all on video. I'm not sure what the social justice angle would be to that if there even is one.
 

KCJr-Phx

Well-Known Member
When was the last time a 17 year old black male with a gun shot someone while defending himself?

Of course you weren't. You've seen the video of what happened and now you just want to play the race card.
I seen Rittenhouse provoke a crackhead by pointing a weapon in his direction and the crackhead ran after him and got shot. I don't know the law but from what I understand you can't provoke someone into attacking you then claim self defense. If I was on the jury hes guilty. There's no way he could've got his gun taken from him while it was strapped around him and the crackhead had no weapon. Guilty.
 

El Correcto

god is dead
I never was expecting a guilty verdict. This society will always give white ppl the benefit of the doubt. Now if he was a black 17 yr old with a gun we would be hearing why does a teenager have a gun. He needs to be put away. Where was his parents.

Black boy shoots up school including teachers and a 15 year old. Parents throw him a dindu nuffin party after bailing him out the very next day. Start gaslighting everyone with leftist media help that he was being bullied and he just shot bullies instead of committing suicide.
 

wilberforce15

Well-Known Member
I seen Rittenhouse provoke a crackhead by pointing a weapon in his direction and the crackhead ran after him and got shot. I don't know the law but from what I understand you can't provoke someone into attacking you then claim self defense. If I was on the jury hes guilty. There's no way he could've got his gun taken from him while it was strapped around him and the crackhead had no weapon. Guilty.
A strap exists for convenience of carry, not for security of the weapon.
 

El Correcto

god is dead
Kyle stood up against domestic terrorist BLM organization and exposed the “protestors” for what they really were, mostly criminals including serial child rapists out rioting.

There wasn’t a single law biding citizen that hit Kyle that night. All of them are pieces of :censored2: domestic abusers and thieves.
 

Box Ox

Well-Known Member
I seen Rittenhouse provoke a crackhead by pointing a weapon in his direction and the crackhead ran after him and got shot.

Video evidence doesn't actually show that. Which is probably why the prosecution team sent Kyle's defense team a low resolution version of the drone footage.

There's no way he could've got his gun taken from him while it was strapped around him and the crackhead had no weapon.

Bet you wouldn't be willing to strap on an AR-15 and see if someone can take it from you on the condition that they'll shoot you if they do.
 

KCJr-Phx

Well-Known Member
Kyle stood up against domestic terrorist BLM organization and exposed the “protestors” for what they really were, mostly criminals including serial child rapists out rioting.

There wasn’t a single law biding citizen that hit Kyle that night. All of them are pieces of :censored2: domestic abusers and thieves.
The group Rittenhouse represents (The Proud Boys) is far more of a domestic threat then BLM.
BLM didn't storm the capital and threaten to kill politicians because they didn't like the results of an election
 

BrownFlush

Woke Racist Reigning Ban King
I'm just watching the hard leftists dance as the facts of the case are presented.

Kyle shouldn't have even been there. But he was. And he was armed. And he shot the people who attacked him. It's all on video. I'm not sure what the social justice angle would be to that if there even is one.
If Kyle shouldn't have been there, who should have? Could you? Could I?
Social justice demands Kyle can go to peaceful protest as well as anyone else.
 

Box Ox

Well-Known Member
If Kyle shouldn't have been there, who should have? Could you? Could I?
Social justice demands Kyle can go to peaceful protest as well as anyone else.

If being part of a peaceful protest was what Kyle had in mind he wouldn't have obtained permission to defend a car dealership.

I'm not under 18 and wouldn't make any arrangements for the defense of local property. So I wouldn't be worried that acknowledging that Kyle shouldn't have been there that night runs counter to my desire to maintain the ability to peacefully protest anything.
 

KCJr-Phx

Well-Known Member
If Kyle shouldn't have been there, who should have? Could you? Could I?
Social justice demands Kyle can go to peaceful protest as well as anyone else.
Of course he can go there. He just can't point weapons at ppl for non life threatening reasons. You can't shoot someone for burning a trash can, flipping over a trailer, jumping on a car, or any other dumb thing these rioters were doing. I've said it before deep down we all know Rittenhouse was there to shoot his weapon and move up within the proud boys rank and file.
 
Top