Should part time employees make the same rate as full time employees?

HarryWarden

Well-Known Member
So you’re voting no if there’s classifications in the next contract? You better get your Red ink ready you’re about to be disappointed
Why do you keep deflecting? I’m asking you what you think is fair

Again, did you say this when 22.4 was brought up? “It’s different classifications it’s fair. So what, you guys are going to vote no if there’s any other classifications in the contract?”
 

BadIdeaGuy

Moderator
Staff member
Stop with the classifications man. I’m asking you what you think is fair

When people brought up 22.4 did you say “different classifications, it’s fair”?
The 22.4 classification was supposed to load/unload for part of a day, and then drive the rest of the day.

It was supposed to have different responsibilities than the RPCD classification.

The company abused the wording, and misused the position.
 

Thebrownblob

Well-Known Member
Stop with the classifications man. I’m asking you what you think is fair

When people brought up 22.4 did you say “different classifications, it’s fair”?
The mistake you’re making is 22.4 was sold as a gimmick. They were supposed to work in the building and Drive not the full-time drivers all the time the language was left vague, so the company naturally abused it. Now those of us with half a brain knew that would happen, but unfortunately, those in places of power last time ignored us.
 

MAKAVELI

Well-Known Member
Well, thank you for your outsiders view on what we already know. No one is suggesting the pay isn’t going up we are suggesting it’s not going up to what Mr. Harry thinks is fair totally in the interview on Bloomberg. Shawn said it was never offered and he wasn’t even asking for $35 an hour, but he would certainly take it if they offered.
He most likely won't get exactly what he wants but that doesn't mean he shouldn't try to fight for it. None of the UPSers would have what you have without fighting for what you think is deserved. But at some point a union will weaken if it's workforce becomes more divided.
 

dogs.bite.me

Well-Known Member
If the part time position is a driver, why not? The more classifications is part of the problem and a big reason many non union employees don't like unions. Why overcomplicate and undervalue your fellow coworkers? I think what SOB is doing, bringing those lower paid employees recognition and better pay is exactly what you guys need to make gains in other companies. That's what will ultimately make for a stronger union in the future.
yes, but the last leadership we had sold it down 3+ contracts in a row. its not going to be fixed overnight. But the process can start to even out the field.
 

HarryWarden

Well-Known Member
The mistake you’re making is 22.4 was sold as a gimmick. They were supposed to work in the building and Drive not the full-time drivers all the time the language was left vague, so the company naturally abused it. Now those of us with half a brain knew that would happen, but unfortunately, those in places of power last time ignored us.
So just because it’s a classification doesn’t mean it’s fair.
 

dogs.bite.me

Well-Known Member
Why do you keep deflecting? I’m asking you what you think is fair

Again, did you say this when 22.4 was brought up? “It’s different classifications it’s fair. So what, you guys are going to vote no if there’s any other classifications in the contract?”
its not fair.
youre underpaid. we've said this over and over.
but this is 30 years in the making. its not going to be fixed one contract.
Keep pushing! We're with you.. The only thing were trying to do is tamp down your expectation that you will recieve exactly what your full time counterpart is getting. Its not happening this contract. But the argument is there that if youre tenured, you shouldnt be $15/hr less.
 

Thebrownblob

Well-Known Member
Why do you keep deflecting? I’m asking you what you think is fair

Again, did you say this when 22.4 was brought up? “It’s different classifications it’s fair. So what, you guys are going to vote no if there’s any other classifications in the contract?”
Harry let me explain realities to you.
We are only worth what we can get iwith the company willing to negotiate with us for. I personally believe I am worth $50 an hour in this economy but I know I’m not getting it anytime soon. Sean has done a good job of pushing the boundaries to see how many really will do and we haven’t even gotten finished yet. I’ve been a union steward for 25 years. I’ve seen a lot of things I feel are unfair. If Sean can get $35 an hour for you you’re worth it. If Shawn can only get $25 an hour for you then that’s what you’re worth.
 
Last edited:

HarryWarden

Well-Known Member
I hear you man, I’m just defensive because I have a lot of fellow union workers in here saying im not worth that, when we should be on the same side

I think you’re worth $50 also, if not more.

What I’m saying is purely logical. That I, as a 15 loader, see no reason why I shouldn’t have the same hourly rate as a full time warehouse worker. That’s it. I don’t believe working an extra 3.5 hour shift justifies a $15 an hour difference in hourly pay, when we are doing the same work

I DO think a driver should have a significantly higher pay than me, because they have more responsibilities. But a full time warehouse worker does not have more responsibilities than a part time, besides being first to be guaranteed full time hours.
 

Thebrownblob

Well-Known Member
I hear you man, I’m just defensive because I have a lot of fellow union workers in here saying im not worth that, when we should be on the same side

I think you’re worth $50 also, if not more.

What I’m saying is purely logical. That I, as a 15 loader, see no reason why I shouldn’t have the same hourly rate as a full time warehouse worker. That’s it. I don’t believe working an extra 3.5 hour shift justifies a $15 an hour difference in hourly pay, when we are doing the same work

I DO think a driver should have a significantly higher pay than me, because they have more responsibilities. But a full time warehouse worker does not have more responsibilities than a part time, besides being first to be guaranteed full time hours.
I think your mistake them saying you’re not worth it for them saying you’re not getting it. None of us would tell you you’re not worth it if Sean can negotiate.
 

dogs.bite.me

Well-Known Member
I hear you man, I’m just defensive because I have a lot of fellow union workers in here saying im not worth that, when we should be on the same side

I think you’re worth $50 also, if not more.

What I’m saying is purely logical. That I, as a 15 loader, see no reason why I shouldn’t have the same hourly rate as a full time warehouse worker. That’s it. I don’t believe working an extra 3.5 hour shift justifies a $15 an hour difference in hourly pay, when we are doing the same work

I DO think a driver should have a significantly higher pay than me, because they have more responsibilities. But a full time warehouse worker does not have more responsibilities than a part time, besides being first to be guaranteed full time hours.
Most of us have done the job you do and know how hard and fast it is.
I did it for 7 years!
Take this fire to your union meetings. Fire up your co-workers. Be a force for change.. Arguing on this forum isn't where it ends.
 

HarryWarden

Well-Known Member
I think your mistake them saying you’re not worth it for them saying you’re not getting it. None of us would tell you you’re not worth it if Sean can negotiate.
I can pull some quotes for you, but I had a lot of comments saying that.

People are straight saying you shouldn’t be able to support yourself on part time. That’s what I don’t understand? Why do you care what someone does with their money? If you can support a family on full time, I just think you should be able to pay rent and food and the bare necessities and go to school on part time. Why are so worried and rationing the pay of fellow blue collar workers and not concerned about the ceo making $20 million a year
 

dogs.bite.me

Well-Known Member
I can pull some quotes for you, but I had a lot of comments saying that.

People are straight saying you shouldn’t be able to support yourself on part time. That’s what I don’t understand? Why do you care what someone does with their money? If you can support a family on full time, I just think you should be able to pay rent and food and the bare necessities and go to school on part time. Why are so worried and rationing the pay of fellow blue collar workers and not concerned about the ceo making $20 million a year
because its crazy expensive to support yourself..... and pt isnt going to do it. PT might cover your rent and some groceries. but a car, insurance, phone, electricity, you wouuld need to make more than 35 an hour
 
Top