Someone Clarify Thanksgiving Holiday Changes??

Mugarolla

Light 'em up!
Unless your Local has a "written" procedure, that differs from the Central Region Language....

There is no "On Call" in the package division.

Or, the Air Dept.

Or, 22.3's

Or, part-timers.

Feeder's, can be different. (Depending on the Local)

-Bug-
OK. They can lay off the bottom 10% due to lack of volume. On call is basically laid off. You are just given the chance to work a day, or 2, or 3 as volume dictates.
 

Bubblehead

My Senior Picture
Like I posted earlier.... Section 4.... has been there since 1982.

If you go in chronological order....

Section 4 supersedes, Section 1.


It sucks. But, that's the way it is.



-Bug-
What do the opening words in section 4 mean, "except as otherwise provided in this agreement"?
 

Bubblehead

My Senior Picture
I would like to believe, we could rely on the "clear and plain meaning".

The whole contract is written in legalese.... with intentional vagueness. (in my opinion)



-Bug-
In many cases, I would agree, but not here.
This isn't a case of legalese or vaguities, rather a poorly written article that contradicts itself at the very least and renders section 4 obsolete if taken literally.

I'll give you another example in the Central Region Supplement, the infamous Art 17(i) which reads:

(i) other cardinal offenses, the Company and the Union agree that
there are offenses where an employee may be suspended in lieu of
discharge


If taken literally, you would believe that the company would enact this article to suspend an employee instead of discharging them.
Somehow though, it works in reverse, allowing the company to jump over progressive discipline.

I think the powers that be hate it when we actually read and digest contractual language.
Instead, they would rather just tell us what it was supposed to say.
No need to fix the problems when we can just treat the symptoms.
 
Last edited:

TooTechie

Geek in Brown
Central Region Supplement:

Article 15 Section 1-Holidays

A regular seniority employee shall not be required to work on the following (8) named holidays-New Years Day, Memorial Day, Fourth of July, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, DAY AFTER THANKSGIVING DAY, Christmas Day, and New Years Eve regardless of the day of the week on which the named holiday falls, provided they comply with the qualifications set forth hereinafter.

OK that pretty much states what the Central Supplement says about the day after thanksgiving. Now tell me how they can just out of the blue say OH by the way we are all working the day after Thanksgiving now? Why is the union allowing this to take place when it is obviously stated against in our supplement?
Keep reading. It then goes on to say if they are required to work what the pay rate will be. Garbage contract language.
 

muthatrucka

Well-Known Member
Apparently (& I think it sounds credible) there has been a huge dropoff in volume leading up to our 4 day Thanksgiving weekend, as shippers diverted volume to other carriers. They hope to recapture those packages.
With the beating we took last year it seems we were doing a poor job of handling the volume we had. It's no secret that this place is under staffed on purpose is it? Been that way for the 20 yrs I've been around anyway and I look for it to continue.


Sent using BrownCafe App
 

HULKAMANIA

Well-Known Member
With the beating we took last year it seems we were doing a poor job of handling the volume we had. It's no secret that this place is under staffed on purpose is it? Been that way for the 20 yrs I've been around anyway and I look for it to continue.


Sent using BrownCafe App


See you bring up a very valid point. Not only did the storm last year happen in Texas, and the idiocy of amazon guaranteeing shipping on orders, but we had to deal with being DEATHLY understaffed! That was supposed to be worked on this year. So tell me how we are going to be in such a jam when that volume they speak of wont even be in the system yet? I just dont understand how they dont see that. How will running people heavily the Day after Thanksgiving clear up volume thats not there?

Here is whats next fellas since we are gonna roll over like morons and take it. Next they will be saying NO VACATIONS to be taken the Week of Thanksgiving. You heard it here first.
 

RealPerson

Well-Known Member
See you bring up a very valid point. Not only did the storm last year happen in Texas, and the idiocy of amazon guaranteeing shipping on orders, but we had to deal with being DEATHLY understaffed! That was supposed to be worked on this year. So tell me how we are going to be in such a jam when that volume they speak of wont even be in the system yet? I just dont understand how they dont see that. How will running people heavily the Day after Thanksgiving clear up volume thats not there?

Here is whats next fellas since we are gonna roll over like morons and take it. Next they will be saying NO VACATIONS to be taken the Week of Thanksgiving. You heard it here first.


Understaffed, is going to continue to be a problem.
in my area, after people work till break ... HAHA yep, or maybe a week, they say "friend" that amount of work for LOW pay.... (part timers)
Wow starting wage is $10 now, well so. McDonalds down the street hires at $9+ No 70lbs burgers coming down the fry line.. HAHA

I "heard" that insurance kicks in faster now for Part Timers, but I think that is because of Obama care, not anything the Union / Ups did...

We had a guy double shift last night who has only been with UPS 4 days... hahahha... Use to be a fight to double shift...
 

BigUnionGuy

Got the T-Shirt
In many cases, I would agree, but not here.
This isn't a case of legalese or vaguities, rather a poorly written article that contradicts itself at the very least and renders section 4 obsolete if taken literally.

What is vaguities ? I think I know.... what you mean.

Unfortunately, this isn't a "court of law".

And the IBT's legal dept. is always involved in contract negotiations.

I think the powers that be hate it when we actually read and digest contractual language.

That is the quickest way.... to get labeled as a "locker room lawyer".

"I know more, than the people who negotiated this contract language".


Bubble.... I understand your motivation.

But, Sam was the same way. Has he lost his vigor ?



-Bug-
 

Bubblehead

My Senior Picture
What is vaguities ? I think I know.... what you mean.

Unfortunately, this isn't a "court of law".

And the IBT's legal dept. is always involved in contract negotiations.
If it weren't for spell check I wouldn't have a chance.
Sorry that got by me.
vaguities
Root word: I thought vague, (when actually it's vacant?) vacuity.
My own mix?
I like it my way, perhaps I'll petition Websters?

That is the quickest way.... to get labeled as a "locker room lawyer".

"I know more, than the people who negotiated this contract language".

I only know what I read on the subject.
My parents used to get away with telling me "because I said so", but I no longer have to accept that explanation.
I was really hoping for an angle, an Old English interpretation, a precedent, etc. that I hadn't considered.
That's how I learn.
I know I didn't negotiate the contract.

Bubble.... I understand your motivation.

But, Sam was the same way. Has he lost his vigor ?



-Bug-

I'm not sure you understand me at all if you imply I'm anything like Sam, and yes, he still has what he's always had and it's unimpressive and shallow.
Unlike Sam, I don't chase windmills.
I ask questions and listen to answers, or as in this case, the lack thereof.
 

BigUnionGuy

Got the T-Shirt
I'm not sure you understand me at all if you imply I'm anything like Sam, and yes, he still has what he's always had and it's unimpressive and shallow.
Unlike Sam, I don't chase windmills.
I ask questions and listen to answers, or as in this case, the lack thereof.

After re-reading what I posted, and your response....

It looks like, I inferred that. But, it's not what I meant.


That particular part (section 4) is the penalty, if required to work on a named Holiday.

Alleging, that it is somehow wrong (38 years later).... is wishful thinking.



-Bug-
 

TooTechie

Geek in Brown
Here is whats next fellas since we are gonna roll over like morons and take it. Next they will be saying NO VACATIONS to be taken the Week of Thanksgiving. You heard it here first.
They can't in most areas. There is language about what percentage can take vacation when.
 

hardball88

get'r done
What is vaguities ? I think I know.... what you mean.

Unfortunately, this isn't a "court of law".

And the IBT's legal dept. is always involved in contract negotiations.



That is the quickest way.... to get labeled as a "locker room lawyer".

"I know more, than the people who negotiated this contract language".


Bubble.... I understand your motivation.

But, Sam was the same way. Has he lost his vigor ?



-Bug-
We know less than the negotiators because many times we're left outside to fend for ourselves... at street level...without the tools to understand.

It would be easier not to care if...that was a possibility for some of us.

Therefore, we pick our poison. And are extremely frustrated with the good ol boys clubs.

Lone rangers or pawns. Choose your poison. Forget about accountability.
 

BigUnionGuy

Got the T-Shirt
We know less than the negotiators because many times we're left outside to fend for ourselves... at street level...without the tools to understand.

Most UPS members, have that "defeatist" attitude.

That's why I continually try and browbeat (through sheer guilt) people in to voting....

Or, attending your Local's monthly meeting. Getting involved, would solve a lot of problems.


Case and point:

http://tdu.org/news/weve-topped-10000


TDU.... is almost bragging.

10,600 signatures, is less than 1% of the IBT membership.

But they post this stuff, along with all the voting results.


Is it any wonder.... why things happen ? Thanks TDU.



-Bug-
 
Top