steel tariffs

Jkloc420

Do you need an air compressor or tire gauge
Are you aware we already tried steel tariffs under bush? Do you know how many billions of dollars the economy lost because of it?

"Conservatives" apparently are against free trade and want big government to regulate and run their economy. Lol. Hypocrites.
actually we did do steel tariffs but the steel industry was merging and filing bankruptcy at the time. So there isnt really a conclusion if they hurt or helped.
 

Jkloc420

Do you need an air compressor or tire gauge

1989

Well-Known Member
Are you aware we already tried steel tariffs under bush? Do you know how many billions of dollars the economy lost because of it?

"Conservatives" apparently are against free trade and want big government to regulate and run their economy. Lol. Hypocrites.
Oh, is this steel tariff the only tariff out there? The very first tariff?
 

tonyexpress

Whac-A-Troll Patrol
Staff member
I have yet to see an economist that believes tariffs create a net job gain. They all agree we lose more due to increased cost of materials.

Just have to wait and see... Could just be a way to make NAFTA more reasonable..

Well, let's talk about that, Steve, because we think there's been a lot of rhetoric on this issue, and we think it's really a bit of a red herring. So when you look at the actual potential price effects of a tariff here on the end user, we think it'll be negligible, if anything at all. But let's just assume for a second that the full effect of the tariff were to be passed along to the end consumer. Let's take a beer can, for example. There's about 3 cents' worth of aluminum in a beer can. So a 10 percent tariff on that beer can would mean the price of that beer can would go up by three-tenths of one penny, or about a penny-and-a-half on a six-pack. Take an automobile. Brand-new automobile, average automobile in this country is sold for about $35,000. There's about 400 pounds of aluminum in that automobile. If that full 10 percent were transmitted, it'd be about a $40 increase in the price of that $35,000 vehicle.
 

It will be fine

Well-Known Member
Just have to wait and see... Could just be a way to make NAFTA more reasonable..

Well, let's talk about that, Steve, because we think there's been a lot of rhetoric on this issue, and we think it's really a bit of a red herring. So when you look at the actual potential price effects of a tariff here on the end user, we think it'll be negligible, if anything at all. But let's just assume for a second that the full effect of the tariff were to be passed along to the end consumer. Let's take a beer can, for example. There's about 3 cents' worth of aluminum in a beer can. So a 10 percent tariff on that beer can would mean the price of that beer can would go up by three-tenths of one penny, or about a penny-and-a-half on a six-pack. Take an automobile. Brand-new automobile, average automobile in this country is sold for about $35,000. There's about 400 pounds of aluminum in that automobile. If that full 10 percent were transmitted, it'd be about a $40 increase in the price of that $35,000 vehicle.
INSKEEP: Here's a bigger impact, at least according to some economists. Stephen Moore - who has advised the president, by the way, on trade - said in an op-ed article over the weekend that these tariffs could protect 140,000 jobs - that sounds good - but then might put several million manufacturing and related jobs at risk because other countries are already talking of retaliation, as you know.
 
Top