Because the last contract was worth 9 billion over 5 years. This one will be worth 14.8 billion over 5 years. It could have been worth 20 billion over 5 years and certain people were never going to give it a chance. There have been people campaigning to vote no for over 5 years now. If you think that isn't a poop burger then you need an enema. Look, Sean wanted the package director job for one reason, to campaign. He was never going to do what was needed because in order to be the GP he could not have his name as the number two on this contract and have a good chance at the GP spot. So he deliberately got himself fired and made himself look like he was a reformer. He is no reformer. You have been played once again.
cool story. if it's true , it's true. if it's not, it's not.
if it is true , then we will vote the bastards out who sold us out when it's time to do so. it doesn't change the fact that this contract as it currently stands is garbage.
I don't care if Dennis , Fred , Sean
or friggain Tom, Dick or a Harry are president;
If it's a bad contract then whoever was responsible will pay for it eventually.
And it also has nothing to do with why you were advocating for this " contract for all" ; You know , the one that you personally were telling everyone to just wait and see and then judge ; Yada yada yada...
The only touting I've seen even close to your incessant " just wait n see" posts were those cheesy NFL tout commercials from the eighties.
Yours and theirs are both equally nauseating. And in both cases the touting was only done to hook the suckers in to believing you both knew something the " common man " didn't and to influence them to have blind friend-ING faith.
It's disgusting.