Can you dunk? or shoot a 3 pointer?...Just askingWell I think we should then show Lebron James, Dwayne Wade, and Kobe Bryant the same contract and see how they respond. Would they say the opposite of what you said?
Can you dunk? or shoot a 3 pointer?...Just askingWell I think we should then show Lebron James, Dwayne Wade, and Kobe Bryant the same contract and see how they respond. Would they say the opposite of what you said?
Getting any substantial, definitive language on those terms is a pipedream.
Go smoke your pipe and dream about it.
Can you dunk? or shoot a 3 pointer?...Just asking
Cant dunk....but I can throw a 50 lb package from my back bumper and take out the bulkhead door!LOL........ Do you work for any of the companies mentioned by the poster or do any of those jobs? "Just asking"....... BTW I can.
Can you dunk? or shoot a 3 pointer?...Just askingWell I think we should then show Lebron James, Dwayne Wade, and Kobe Bryant the same contract and see how they respond. Would they say the opposite of what you said?
So a "Substantial" $1.50 raise nets a new hire $0.50-$.063. That's a joke!
It will 5 more years of the same bs!!!! Most of us will never see retirement!!
#1) It's really a 50c pay hike, since the additional dollar is negated by the loss of the 90-day raise.
#2) The pay hike is $1.50 for 90-days, 50c for the balance of the first year as well as the second, $1 for the third year, 63c for the fourth year. Based on a PTer working 20-hours per week:
- It's an extra $760 in the first year of employment, on wages of $10,920
- It's an extra $520 in the second year of employment, on wages of $11,440
- It's an extra $1040 in the third year of employment, on wages of $12,480
- It's an extra $655 in the third year of employment, on wages of $13,136
- It's nearly an extra $3000, on wages of nearly $48,000
So I'd disagree it's a joke, and say it's pretty significant.
#3) I suspect the changes in the progression scale are being done to a) make UPS much more attractive to short-term employees and b) align/stay ahead of minimum wage
Remember, a third-year employee will be banking $12/hour alongside full no-cost benefits. 10-year employees at our nation's largest employer don't earn much more than $10/hour and they certainly don't get benefits. And FedEx Ground tops out at $14/hour -- without benefits -- after four years. So while I'm maintain the pay is pathetic for a union shop, it still makes UPS stand out to menial workers.
Could you imagine Scott Davis if UPS had a FedEX Ground-type work environment, in which PT topped out at $14/hour (no benefits, other than tuition reimbursement) after four years and had no hope for any non-management FT job? Uh-oh... clean up on aisle 4. And bring the HazMat crew.
I agree that $3,000 is nice but it is over 4 years and it is certainly Not the $1.50 increase that was implied.
The more I read, the more I investigate what was said at the rallies, the more I connect the dots....the more I am convinced we were all bamboozled into this union run healthcare. The plans for us all to go into a union plan was in motion long before hall supposedly walked away from the negotiation table.
They (UPS AND THE UNION) knew from the get go they would have a hard time selling the rank and file on the Union running the healthcare. They (UPS AND UNION) came up with a plan to scare everyone into thinking that WE could end up paying 30/60/90. Get everyone fired up and angry. This was to lighten the blow of a Union run healthcare plan. Then come back and say "we made progress, UPS has come down to 20/40/60 but that isn't good enough". Then come out with the "we have a great contract". Trying to give the impression that they fought a good fight and got us a great contract. All the while they got a lot of the rank and file to accept the healthcare issue as a "well, at least we aren't paying 30/60/90"
It was a plan, and not a well executed one at that!! They can blow me.
I say vote no on 1st proposal. Commonsense tells us their 1st proposal is going to be their worst. Let them jerkoffs know were tired of playing their idiotic game. The drivers are the ones who make them their money and we are the ones who have to clean up their screwups every,every single day.
It was never implied. The union delivered exactly what it promoted -- a $1.50 bump in the starting wage. Of course, further details aren't promoted because ... well, what good politician would do so?
Nonetheless, when I graduated high school in 2001, Kroger -- also a union shop -- was hiring at $10/hour, and offering a $1 premium for hours worked between 4PM & 8PM. Today -- nearly 12 years later (wow, am I really that old?) -- Kroger is hiring at $7.25/hour with no shift premium. That's a $2.75 drop. Meanwhile, UPS was hiring at $8.50 -- no additional raises until after one year. Today, it's been upped to $10/hour.
Bagels, you previously stated the part time pay rate was "For a union shop, it's absolutely pathetic." I don't see how you can be defending/promoting the proposed part time increase. A 50 cent net increase in the starting pay is not a substantial increase.
I do think that. But I also recognize that a) there's only so much money to go around; b) the drivers - once again - got most of it; and c) PT compensation far exceeds that of other comparable menial jobs.
The more I read, the more I investigate what was said at the rallies, the more I connect the dots....the more I am convinced we were all bamboozled into this union run healthcare. The plans for us all to go into a union plan was in motion long before hall supposedly walked away from the negotiation table.
They (UPS AND THE UNION) knew from the get go they would have a hard time selling the rank and file on the Union running the healthcare. They (UPS AND UNION) came up with a plan to scare everyone into thinking that WE could end up paying 30/60/90. Get everyone fired up and angry. This was to lighten the blow of a Union run healthcare plan. Then come back and say "we made progress, UPS has come down to 20/40/60 but that isn't good enough". Then come out with the "we have a great contract". Trying to give the impression that they fought a good fight and got us a great contract. All the while they got a lot of the rank and file to accept the healthcare issue as a "well, at least we aren't paying 30/60/90"
It was a plan, and not a well executed one at that!! They can blow me.