DriveInDriѵeOut
Inordinately Right
All legal paths for him to pursue.
The 2024 Presidential Race Thread
- Thread starter Wally
- Start date
Doublestandards
Well-Known Member
DriveInDriѵeOut
Inordinately Right
You know Trump was told there was not widespread fraud.
Do you also know that Trump was told there was widespread fraud?
Nope. I think if we had delayed certification and proven election integrity and legality, then we wouldn't have to even be talking about it right now.
Doublestandards
Well-Known Member
You just said that if democrats win the house, they could be allowed to label Trump an inssurectionist and not certify his election
If that’s legal, then would you be okay with it?
DriveInDriѵeOut
Inordinately Right
Fake narrative.
Listen to the phone call and you would know that.
But you won't do that.
Doublestandards
Well-Known Member
funny, because we did prove election integrity, through the courts, and we are still talking about, because Trump is STILL denying the results and claiming the election was fraudulent
DriveInDriѵeOut
Inordinately Right
No we didn't.
Doublestandards
Well-Known Member
I have listened to it. What Trump did was most likely illegal, and absolutely unethical
Anyone else who wants to listen to it and read the transcript can do so here
Read the full transcript and listen to Trump's audio call with Georgia secretary of state
CNN has obtained the full January 2 audio call between President Donald Trump and Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger. Trump is joined on the call by White House chief of staff Mark Meadows and several lawyers.
amp.cnn.com
Next Day Err
Banned
And, apparently, a few illegal paths
Doublestandards
Well-Known Member
Cases were brought forth to the court by the Trump team, and nothing was found. All a crock.
In fact, Fox News had to pay almost a billion dollars in fine for lying about it
And trumps top advisors and people closest to him have acknowledged in court under oath that they have no credible evidence of any widespread election fraud
DriveInDriѵeOut
Inordinately Right
No you didn't.
Unless you're not capable of basic arithmetic.
DriveInDriѵeOut
Inordinately Right
Because the cases weren't heard.
Doublestandards
Well-Known Member
And why was that? You’re getting close
DriveInDriѵeOut
Inordinately Right
And yet Democrat media didn't have to pay anything for doing the exact same thing but worse.
Doublestandards
Well-Known Member
So confident of something you are wrong about. Interesting pattern
Doublestandards
Well-Known Member
The courts are in on the conspiracy now too? You’re full on board the deep state conspiracies now?
DriveInDriѵeOut
Inordinately Right
I mean you claimed he only asked for exactly the amount needed to win, but he laid out in clear detail which votes he thought were fraudulent and the number was much higher than the exact number needed.
So either you didn't listen to it, you can't add, or you're lying on purpose. Maybe I was being too generous by choosing option 1.
DriveInDriѵeOut
Inordinately Right
Nice deflection.
DriveInDriѵeOut
Inordinately Right
Apparently the paths Democrats are taking to lock him up are illegal too because the courts keep rejecting them. Lol!
UnionStrong
Sorry, but I don’t care anymore.
Kamala is an absolute idiot, period, full stop.
Similar threads
