The difference between Conservatives and Liberals

bottomups

Bad Moon Risen'
He has balance the budget and has a surplus. It wasn't the Democrats that did that, but Republican Scott Walker and the Republicans in Wisconsins government that did that.
And you are worried about his accounting gimmicks?
I think you are more worried that after his massive successes in Wisconsin, that he'll decide to run for president in 2016. President Scott Walker. I like the way that sounds.
Explain to me how spending $1.8 billion more than you take in balances the budget?
Look a little deeper into Wisconsins finances and you would find out that there is no surplus but a large structural deficit.
Walker would not even carry his own state in 2016.
 

realbrown1

Annoy a liberal today. Hit them with facts.
Explain to me how spending $1.8 billion more than you take in balances the budget?
Look a little deeper into Wisconsins finances and you would find out that there is no surplus but a large structural deficit.
Walker would not even carry his own state in 2016.
He and the Republican erased a $3.6 billion deficit all while being called every name in the book by the Democrats.
And that $1.8 billion deficit was if the Democrats got everything they wanted. They didn't. So come back here next year and we will talk about if Wisconsin has a deficit. They won't, cause Walkers going to run for President and that would look bad to the voters.
 

wkmac

Well-Known Member
Explain to me how spending $1.8 billion more than you take in balances the budget?
Look a little deeper into Wisconsins finances and you would find out that there is no surplus but a large structural deficit.
Walker would not even carry his own state in 2016.

You may be a little light in the wallet with that $1.8 bil deficit. ;)

MADISON — Gov. Scott Walker's administration said Thursday that Wisconsin faces a $2.2 billion budget shortfall by mid-2017, a problem that will have to be tackled by the Republican-controlled Legislature next year as Walker builds his resume for a potential presidential run and looks to deliver on a campaign promise to cut taxes.

From the Green Bay Press Gazette, Nov. 20. 2014 issue

And it seems the bad news continues as of Jan. 14, 2015 issue of Green Bay Press Gazette


So come back here next year and we will talk about if Wisconsin has a deficit. They won't, cause Walkers going to run for President and that would look bad to the voters.

By Hook or Crook comes to mind.
 

realbrown1

Annoy a liberal today. Hit them with facts.
Last edited:

bottomups

Bad Moon Risen'
Actually the only way we show a surplus is to borrow another $1.8 billion over the next two years and add that to our long term debt which now sits at around $15 billion.
This state is just kicking the debt down the road, much like the Federal government does.
 

realbrown1

Annoy a liberal today. Hit them with facts.
Actually the only way we show a surplus is to borrow another $1.8 billion over the next two years and add that to our long term debt which now sits at around $15 billion.
This state is just kicking the debt down the road, much like the Federal government does.
No. You will show a surplus when Gov. Walker and the other Republicans cut $2 billion from the current budget.
No borrowing required.
Aren't you happy about that? You didn't seem to like borrowing in your post. Aren't you glad Gov. Walker's not going to continue the reckless, and wasteful spending that the Liberal Democrats love so much?
 

wkmac

Well-Known Member
tumblr_inline_myycka6kC81qb7qbj.jpg
 

bottomups

Bad Moon Risen'
Jan 30, 6:58 PM EST

Report: Walker would borrow $1.3B rather than raise gas tax to pay for transportation projects



MILWAUKEE (AP) -- Gov. Scott Walker plans to rely on borrowing rather than a gasoline tax increase to fund transportation projects over the next two years.

The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reported Friday that the governor's plan calls for $1.3 billion in borrowing for transportation, but the state's overall borrowing would drop because Walker wants to delay construction of buildings that don't already have initial approval, including projects in the University of Wisconsin system.

The newspaper reported that the plan will let Walker tout his opposition to raising taxes as he considers a possible run for president, but that the increased reliance on borrowing to fund highways may not go over well with his fellow Republicans who control the Legislature.

Walker plans to formally introduce the proposal Tuesday. Lawmakers will spend the next few months reshaping it.

"Walker's goal, as stated multiple times, is to lower the burden on the hardworking taxpayers of the state every year he is in office while continuing to invest in his priorities," Walker spokeswoman Laurel Patrick said in a written statement.

Two years ago, Walker and GOP lawmakers approved $2 billion in borrowing. About half was for buildings and maintenance and about half was for transportation. Walker's new plan contains no new borrowing for buildings because the state has $858 million in unused bonding authority it can still use.

Sen. Alberta Darling, R-River Hills, co-chairwoman of the budget-writing Joint Finance Committee, said wants to see Walker's overall plan before deciding how much borrowing she could support. She also said she wants to see a sustainable system for funding roads.

"The can keeps getting kicked down the road," she said. "I'd say right now everything's on the table."

Walker's transportation secretary, Mark Gottlieb, in November recommended increasing gas taxes and vehicle fees by $751 million over two years. Walker's office said he rejected those proposals.

---
 
Top