El Correcto
god is dead
Probably one out of thousand photos cherry picked for the narrative they are pushing on sheep like you to further their oppressive ideology under guise of altruism and equality.
Probably one out of thousand photos cherry picked for the narrative they are pushing on sheep like you to further their oppressive ideology under guise of altruism and equality.
Looks like the guy on the left is showing restraint instead of clocking the guy on the right. I've seen the same type of look a couple of times before someone tried to knock the smug look off my face.
Are you floridays? Who the hell are you smart guy? HAHAHA...And the hits just keep on coming.
Yet another political thread, in which I'll be joining the fray, at another time in the near future. Once I've had enough time to read and process the jist of it, and can comment with relevance to the discussion, of course.
BUT...until that time, I cannot in good faith speak upon matters contained therein, so peace out, until I can.
Why don’t you go ahead and list process crimes and we’ll see what exists and what doesn’t.
It’s ok. I have no problem rubbing your nose in it.
You have nothing to rub my nose in, and you won't.
Every current guilty plea and conviction in this conspiracy is a process crime. I guess you have no idea of the definition
Tax evasion is not a “process crime”.
What difference does it make if most are process crimes? Bill Clinton was impeached for what courts would have considered a “process crime”.
You confirmed my belief, you have absolutely no idea what a process crime is.
I think he may be alluding to the thought that process crimes are often used as a tactic by prosecutors, when they're pretty sure they can't (successfully) prosecute the targets of an investigation, for their more serious alleged crimes, which they really wish to prosecute them on. So hence, they use these less serious process crimes as a means to exact some type of punishment. I think that may be what he's saying, that he's of the opinion you don't understand what these crimes are typically used for. Leverage, coercion, revenge, to save face, etc etc. (Although if that was what he meant, he could've just stated as much, so perhaps I'm giving a maroon too much credit and benefit of the doubt, which is a distinct possibility.)I know what google tells me and that seems to be more than what you know, so there’s that.
I'm the smug guy, and I understand everything you just said. To respond to your YET scenario, that day ain't comin.I think he may be alluding to the thought that process crimes are often used as a tactic by prosecutors, when they're pretty sure they can't (successfully) prosecute the targets for the more serious alleged crimes for which they really wish to prosecute them on, so hence they use these less serious process crimes as a means to exact some type of punishment. I think that may be what he's saying, that you don't understand what these crimes are typically used for. Leverage, coercion, revenge, to save face, etc etc. Although if that was what he meant, he could've just stated as much, so perhaps I'm giving a maroon too much credit and benefit of the doubt, which is a distinct possibility.
So if I were him, or just any prudent observer of the Mueller investigation, I'd add and emphasize the word YET, in these instances we're speaking of. For example: Trump's and most of his cronies haven't been charged with anything but process crimes as a result of the Mueller investigation, YET. Because Mueller's investigation seems to be extremely thorough, and by all accounts he's legendary in his dogged pursuit of crimes he's been tasked with getting to the bottom of. So this smug, cocksure demeanor Trump supporters have flaunted throughout this investigation, may come to a deflating conclusion in their near future.
If this isn't what he was referring to, then I'm really unclear on why he thinks you don't know what the definition of a process crime is. It's truly the only logical conclusion I could come to.
Yes. The fat orange guy is doing all he can to refrain from kicking the crap out of the ex-KGB agent.Looks like the guy on the left is showing restraint instead of clocking the guy on the right. I've seen the same type of look a couple of times before someone tried to knock the smug look off my face.
Personally, that's my best answer.
I'm Larry Bird, the greatest white boy ever to lace em up, who theAre you floridays? Who the hell are you smart guy? HAHAHA
You forgot to mention you're delusional,...........Mr. Bird.I'm Larry Bird, the greatest white boy ever to lace em up, who theare YOU?
I'm a 12 time all-star, 3 time back to back to back MVP, and a 3 time NBA champ, who did it all for the pusillanimous. That's who I am, and what I'm about.
Eisenhower, Nixon, Reagan, and Trump all tried to get along with the Russians. Used to be called detente. Were they all traitors who colluded?
Only one of them gave away Israeli state secrets.Eisenhower, Nixon, Reagan, and Trump all tried to get along with the Russians. Used to be called detente. Were they all traitors who colluded?
You're deflecting and ignoring what I said about her having dirt on people. When you want to have an honest conversation get back to me.Did he plead guilty to something he was guilty of?
I’m sure he could have arranged some more kidnappings to pay his legal fees.
Did they give away American state secrets? That would be Bill Clinton.Only one of them gave away Israeli state secrets.
The ex-KGB fella who, also just happens to be 6th dan black belt in judo. Brah took 3rd in the russian junior nationals, in his youth, and was the senior champ, in his later years. DonnyYes. The fat orange guy is doing all he can to refrain from kicking the crap out of the ex-KGB agent.
Lol. Yep. That’s what’s going on.
I noticed you conveniently forgot to list Clinton and Obama, which is ok, since detente only occurred from 1969 until 1979, and would obviously leave them out of it.Eisenhower, Nixon, Reagan, and Trump all tried to get along with the Russians. Used to be called detente. Were they all traitors who colluded?
Ok, I'll bite.Did they give away American state secrets? That would be Bill Clinton.
what matters is why did he win or even get nominated? and why was hillary the one who was challenging him? why do we always elect corrupt presidents?E tu ricky?
Nobody says Trump didn’t win. He did.
Whether he had foreign help and is now compromised because of it is what matters.