newfie
Well-Known Member
No pepsi's died on her watchTo be head of global security at a Fortune 44 company is not a small task. But don’t let me stop you from looking down on all women hires.
No pepsi's died on her watchTo be head of global security at a Fortune 44 company is not a small task. But don’t let me stop you from looking down on all women hires.
“Why” she was a failure has nothing to do with her sex and gender, unless YOU have evidence. Do you see how this works?He would rather gaslight everyone instead of trying to get to the bottom of why she was such a failure and allowed to take this position.
They all should’ve tackled the protectee and not let him up until it was all clear for sure. They ALL failed, including the men.Most likely she was picked to head the Secret Service because she was on Jill's detail when Joe was VP and was said to be Jill's favorite. But it's her policy for DEI hires after being installed that matter. She planned to make the Secret Service 30% female by 2030. Wonderful you say. Except as was demonstrated in Butler the female agents involved weren't tall enough to completely cover the candidate. You don't sacrifice safety in the name of equity. Throw in the many bad decisions made and one has to question the competency of the director.
You don’t know that she wasn’t hired because of her sex do you? Because they won’t tell us will they? So you can’t say that with any certainty It’s very hard to know those things when they lie or are evasive about things. It would be hard for me to believe you were that ignorant on how things work.“Why” she was a failure has nothing to do with her sex and gender, unless YOU have evidence. Do you see how this works?
THEN LET’S CHILL AND WAIT FOR THE INVESTIGATION. I can’t be expected to prove a counterfactual here.You don’t know that she wasn’t hired because of her sex do you? Because they won’t tell us will they? So you can’t say that with any certainty It’s very hard to know those things when they lie or are evasive about things. It would be hard for me to believe you were that ignorant on how things work.
Perhaps, but by that point they had already heard the shooter was down.They all should’ve tackled the protectee and not let him up until it was all clear for sure. They ALL failed, including the men.
See that’s where the problem is the investigation will never tell us anything. You know it and I know it as long as they’re investigating themselves nothing will happen and nothing will be said.THEN LET’S CHILL AND WAIT FOR THE INVESTIGATION. I can’t be expected to prove a counterfactual here.
Wow, you sure seem to know exactly what the future will be. Better to just blame women and people that hire them without evidence. Actually, let’s blame them with countervailing evidence!See that’s where the problem is the investigation will never tell us anything. You know it and I know it as long as they’re investigating themselves nothing will happen and nothing will be said.
You only have to see the past and know the futureWow, you sure seem to know exactly what the future will be. Better to just blame women and people that hire them without evidence. Actually, let’s blame them with countervailing evidence!
Of course it would. Mistakes that dumb might now become known as "Cheatles".
He would rather gaslight everyone instead of trying to get to the bottom of why she was such a failure and allowed to take this position.
They still have to stand him up and walk him out. Women are a foot.shorter shouldn't be on that detail. Nor should very short men. Safety is paramount, not inclusion.They all should’ve tackled the protectee and not let him up until it was all clear for sure. They ALL failed, including the men.
Interesting that the Director did not understand that that is a pretty basic idea. You need some pretty big people to block bullets.They still have to stand him up and walk him out. Women are a foot.shorter shouldn't be on that detail. Nor should very short men. Safety is paramount, not inclusion.
Of course, yes. Maybe wait until after the entire area is known to be secure?They still have to stand him up and walk him out.
Very good question how did they not know the guy was there 10 seconds before that?Of course, yes. Maybe wait until after the entire area is known to be secure?
How’d they know for sure it was all clear 10 seconds after the last shot was fired?
It was a complete failure. No arguing that.Very good question how did they not know the guy was there 10 seconds before that?
I agree that 100% safety is a complete illusion.I think we are learning that no security perimeter is necessarily perfect. One can try to kill the president, but one will die trying.
100% safety is an illusion.
This doesn’t absolve the USSS of anything, however. It was a failure. Trump should’ve never been shot at in the first place.
It's remarkable how fast Republicans have pivoted from Biden is decrepit and brain dead to Biden was ousted in a coup by anti-democratic elites! I mean, I would have figured it would take at least a few days.
Kevin Drum