THE TRUMP 2024 THREAD

[Doublestandards]

Pay attention
View attachment 503885

That’s before we ever were talking about the situation of rape

You were saying the parents can’t force the child to have an abortion

I’m asking if you think the parents should be able to force the child to NOT have an abortion

 

[Thebrownblob]

That’s before we ever were talking about the situation of rape

You were saying the parents can’t force the child to have an abortion

I’m asking if you think the parents should be able to force the child to NOT have an abortion

You asked me a question and I answered it. You asked me if the parents decision Can override the adolescent.

It’s also interesting that you always assuming that the adolescent would want to have an abortion and not have the baby. It just goes to show where your head is at.

Again parents should be intimately involved in such a decision that would be between their family members. Keep yourself, strangers. and the government out of it.

 

[Doublestandards]

You asked me a question and I answered it. You asked me if the parents decision Can override the adolescent.

Again, that question was not related to what I’m asking now.

I asked “so you’re saying if the child wanted an abortion but the parents don’t, she shouldn’t be able to have one, right?”
And you said that is correct

I’m asking you now, if the child was raped, and wants an abortion, but the parents don’t want her to have one, are you saying the parents should be able to still override the adolescents decision and force her to have the rapists baby?

It’s also interesting that you always assuming that the adolescent would want to have an abortion and not have the baby. It just goes to show where your head is at.

When did I say “always”? Stop with these weird blanket statements

 

[Thebrownblob]

Again, that question was not related to what I’m asking now.

I asked “so you’re saying if the child wanted an abortion but the parents don’t, she shouldn’t be able to have one, right?”
And you said that is correct

I’m asking you now, if the child was raped, and wants an abortion, but the parents don’t want her to have one, are you saying the parents should be able to still override the adolescents decision and force her to have the rapists baby?

When did I say “always”? Stop with these weird blanket statements

“In most cases, a parent or guardian can override an adolescent's decisions, as they typically have legal authority to make choices on behalf of a minor, especially when those decisions could significantly impact the child's health, safety, or well-being; however, this authority is not absolute and depends on the specific situation and the adolescent's maturity level,”

 

[Doublestandards]

“In most cases, a parent or guardian can override an adolescent's decisions, as they typically have legal authority to make choices on behalf of a minor, especially when those decisions could significantly impact the child's health, safety, or well-being; however, this authority is not absolute and depends on the specific situation and the adolescent's maturity level,”

Ok, so now who decides that from that point? You said you want the government to stay out of it right? So the child says she was raped, the parents say she should not have an abortion, the child says she wants one, who steps in and decides from this point? The clock would be ticking with the fetus growing, it takes over a year for any court cases to prove anything

 

[Thebrownblob]

Ok, so now who decides that from that point? You said you want the government to stay out of it right? So the child says she was raped, the parents say she should not have an abortion, the child says she wants one, who steps in and decides from this point? The clock would be ticking with the fetus growing, it takes over a year for any court cases to prove anything

Ok, so now who decides that from that point? You said you want the government to stay out of it right? So the child says she was raped, the parents say she should not have an abortion, the child says she wants one, who steps in and decides from this point? The clock would be ticking with the fetus growing, it takes over a year for any court cases to prove anything

Who decides? Not you and not me.

 

[Doublestandards]

Who decides? Not you and not me.

And you said not the government… So if the child was raped, and she didn’t want to have the baby but the parents were against abortion, you think she should be forced to have it?

Or it sounds like you do want the government involved, for certain situations, but again, how do you decide at that point? Could every woman then just say she was raped as a loophole?

 

[BrownFlush]

You claimed extra rights. I’m highlighting real world examples and the law when it comes to the civil rights.

Bathrooms for trans are not "extra"?
Since homos now have minority status, you don't see that as "extra"?
Can the government can look at a place and demand not only so many women and blacks work there, but sucking dick makes one qualified for the job?

 

[Doublestandards]

Can the government can look at a place and demand not only so many women and blacks work there, but sucking dick makes one qualified for the job?

and you tried to question my IQ lol

 

[BigUnionGuy]

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

I’m not at all. These Christians are on here crying saying lgbt people have “special rights” while I’m highlighting not only do they have less rights legally, they aren’t even using the rights they have as much as straight Christian men are in the work place.

Gender affirming care is more than sexual reassignment surgery, that’s only 1 aspects on it usually used only on adults.

Another thing, if rubber met road on this whole bearded drivers for Jesus movement, it was your job or your beard, there would be a lot of baby faced sell outs walking around the hub. If same thing happened to your lgbt coworkers, be straight or be fired, there’d be a lot of jobless lgbt people. That’s what it means for something to be a “pillar of identity” as one mod put it.

Taking it in the ass isn't a religion.
Sorry sweetheart, try harder.

 

[BrownFlush]

and you tried to question my IQ lol

Tried?
There's no question.

 

[BrownFlush]

You claimed extra rights. I’m highlighting real world examples and the law when it comes to the civil rights.

Gays have less and overall use them less in my workplace.

Real world example: Marines claiming to be gay. Getting married. Getting the pay, benefits, and housing (money)for married couples.
Their time of duty is up. They get a divorce and go on with their merry heterosexual way.

I hear they're looking for a few good men who have less civil rights and do not have the protection of the government,

 

[El Correcto]

Taking it in the ass isn't a religion.
Sorry sweetheart, try harder.

I’d never put being gay as the same level of being religious. That’s an insult to gays.
Religious people are truly delusional, gays are just gays.

 

[El Correcto]

Real world example: Marines claiming to be gay. Getting married. Getting the pay, benefits, and housing (money)for married couples.
Their time of duty is up. They get a divorce and go on with their merry heterosexual way.

I hear they're looking for a few good men who have less civil rights and do not have the protection of the government,

So now you’re against marines getting paid more?
Why do you hate our troops?

Can a female/male friend couple not pull the same stunt?

 

[El Correcto]

Bathrooms for trans are not "extra"?
Since homos now have minority status, you don't see that as "extra"?
Can the government can look at a place and demand not only so many women and blacks work there, but sucking dick makes one qualified for the job?

What qualifies as minority status in your eyes?

If you insult a person based on religion they get the same rights as someone who was insulted based on sexuality in the workplace.

Me being gay and oppositional towards religion that preach hate doesn’t give me the right to walk into the workplace and discriminate against the “faithful”(delusional).

A business cannot discriminate against Christians or refuse to hire Christians if they reach a certain amount of employees, same as gays.

You literally have every right a gay does and more legally speaking.

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

I’d never put being gay as the same level of being religious. That’s an insult to gays.
Religious people are truly delusional, gays are just gays.

Are you upset that you people aren't going to be able to toy around with little kids' genitals and medicate them to be unichs?

Just curious if that's what you're actually here to cry about, because that scotus case is the only current event lately about you people, right?

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

Imagine being gay in 2024 and actually thinking you're some kind of oppressed minority. Lol.

 

[Darmark7]

Imagine being gay in 2024 and actually thinking you're some kind of oppressed minority. Lol.

Always playing the victim card. Just a matter of time before the gays will need reparations.

 

[El Correcto]

Are you upset that you people aren't going to be able to toy around with little kids' genitals and medicate them to be unichs?

Just curious if that's what you're actually here to cry about, because that scotus case is the only current event lately about you people, right?

I’m just educating the ignorant who claim gays have “special rights” or “extra rights”.
That is an absurdly stupid claim to make against a group that isn’t even fully equal under federal civil rights laws, that Christians are fully covered under.