THE TRUMP 2024 THREAD

[Box Ox]

Do you believe Jessica Yaniv was discriminated against based on gender identity?

No I think that woman has every right to say she doesn’t want to deal with those types of genitals.
But IF it is the law she has to as a business providing public services she should hire someone who doesn’t mind and can cover that nonsense for her.

So it's not discrimination based on gender identity but the business should still be required to accommodate the demand for ball waxing? So it actually is discrimination based on gender identity in your opinion? That is the specific kind of protection against discrimination based on gender identity that you want to see in US law, isn't it?

 

[Doublestandards]

Indeed. So it's probably a good idea to be clear on what we're actually talking about when we're discussing discrimination based on gender identity. I also think it's a mistake for anyone to be conflating being gay with being trans. They're not the same thing. People who support trans insanity probably tie the two together as if they're inextricably linked because they know like myself support gay rights and might just go along with the trans insanity too.

I don’t understand your disdain for trans people, to me it’s the same. I don’t understand trans as much as I don’t understand gay, but neither chooses it. You gotta just let people live their lives man

 

[Box Ox]

Indeed. So it's probably a good idea to be clear on what we're actually talking about when we're discussing discrimination based on gender identity. I also think it's a mistake for anyone to be conflating being gay with being trans. They're not the same thing. People who support trans insanity probably tie the two together as if they're inextricably linked because they know like myself support gay rights and might just go along with the trans insanity too.

I don’t understand your disdain for trans people, to me it’s the same. I don’t understand trans as much as I don’t understand gay, but neither chooses it. You gotta just let people live their lives man

If a trans person demands that your business waxes their balls, would that qualify as just letting people live their lives or is that something being forced on you?

 

[Doublestandards]

If a trans person demands that your business waxes their balls, would that qualify as just letting people live their lives or is that something being forced on you?

Dude there’s stupid crazy people suing for dumb crap every day. No reason to get upset at a whole group of people


All I know is it must suck to be trans, and I don’t think anyone would choose it

 

[Box Ox]

Indeed. So it's probably a good idea to be clear on what we're actually talking about when we're discussing discrimination based on gender identity. I also think it's a mistake for anyone to be conflating being gay with being trans. They're not the same thing. People who support trans insanity probably tie the two together as if they're inextricably linked because they know like myself support gay rights and might just go along with the trans insanity too.

I don’t understand your disdain for trans people, to me it’s the same. I don’t understand trans as much as I don’t understand gay, but neither chooses it. You gotta just let people live their lives man

If a trans person demands that your business waxes their balls, would that qualify as just letting people live their lives or is that something being forced on you?

Dude there’s stupid crazy people suing for dumb crap every day. No reason to get upset at a whole group of people


All I know is it must suck to be trans, and I don’t think anyone would choose it

If a "trans female" is allowed to beat up on biological females on the playing field, is that just letting people live their lives or is that something being forced on the biological females?

 

[El Correcto]

So it's not discrimination based on gender identity but the business should still be required to accommodate the demand for ball waxing? So it actually is discrimination based on gender identity in your opinion? That is the specific kind of protection against discrimination based on gender identity that you want to see in US law, isn't it?

I said IF it is considered discrimination under law a business shouldn’t be able to say “Well the owner doesn’t like that so em”. The business needs to spend the money to accommodate all of the public.

My opinion on the matter doesn’t matter, what matters is what laws say about public accommodations and what businesses fall under it on a federal and local level.

Gay business owners would be forced to cater to Christians if their business falls under public accommodations.

 

[El Correcto]

You are bringing up Canadian transgender law for what purpose? A lawsuit she lost by the way.

It’s a very stupid subject to hop into instead of addressing the inequality I’m talking about.

 

[newfie]

Don’t be upset because white straight Christian males are the ones standing up for their rights for gender affirming treatment in the workplace.
The thought of shaving their beards causes them so much emotional distress (dysphoria) they are willing to invoke their “extra rights” (civil rights) to keep their beards.

christian derangement syndrome

 

[Box Ox]

You are bringing up Canadian transgender law for what purpose? A lawsuit she lost by the way.

It’s a very stupid subject to hop into instead of addressing the inequality I’m talking about.

Because if we were to have the kind of laws against gender identity based discrimination that it seems you'd like to see here in the US, beauticians would have to be waxing the balls of men who think they're women. It wouldn't be just letting people live their lives like anyone else. It would be forcing everyday people and businesses to accommodate the delusions of people who think they're the opposite sex.

 

[Doublestandards]

If a "trans female" is allowed to beat up on biological females on the playing field, is that just letting people live their lives or is that something being forced on the biological females?

I don’t think trans women should play physical sports with biological women

 

[Box Ox]

If a "trans female" is allowed to beat up on biological females on the playing field, is that just letting people live their lives or is that something being forced on the biological females?

I don’t think trans women should play physical sports with biological women

Yet they are right now. So the quote below can't apply to that situation, right?

You gotta just let people live their lives man

 

[El Correcto]

Because if we were to have the kind of laws against gender identity based discrimination that it seems you'd like to see here in the US, beauticians would have to be waxing the balls of men who think they're women. It wouldn't be just letting people live their lives like anyone else. It would be forcing everyday people and businesses to accommodate the delusions of people who think they're the opposite sex.

That isn’t true.

Because if we were to have the kind of laws against gender identity based discrimination that it seems you'd like to see here in the US, beauticians would have to be waxing the balls of men who think they're women. It wouldn't be just letting people live their lives like anyone else. It would be forcing everyday people and businesses to accommodate the delusions of people who think they're the opposite sex.

you’re trying to boil a public accommodations down to individuals.
A business that wants to operate in America should be able to meet the non-discrimination standards set by civil rights.

If a business owner doesn’t wanna personally wax balls, that’s fine. But if you’re a public accommodation, you need to hire someone that will and accommodate.

 

[El Correcto]

If disingenuous to a treat a business providing services to the community as an individual with personal preferences.

It should be viewed as a business or organization that can meet the demands of the law.

 

[vantexan]

That isn’t true.

you’re trying to boil a public accommodations down to individuals.
A business that wants to operate in America should be able to meet the non-discrimination standards set by civil rights.

If a business owner doesn’t wanna personally wax balls, that’s fine. But if you’re a public accommodation, you need to hire someone that will and accommodate.

Do you have any idea how insane that sounds? "Wax my balls or be sued!"
Never realized suing over wedding cakes for two guys could sound normal until now.

 

[Box Ox]

if we were to have the kind of laws against gender identity based discrimination that it seems you'd like to see here in the US, beauticians would have to be waxing the balls of men who think they're women.

That isn’t true.

A business that wants to operate in America should be able to meet the non-discrimination standards set by civil rights.

So it actually is true.

 

[El Correcto]

So it actually is true.

No your post is focused on individuals which have every right to refuse to do a job.
My post is focused on public accommodations which are not.

 

[Box Ox]

No your post is focused on individuals which have every right to refuse to do a job.
My post is focused on public accommodations which are not.

Because if we were to have the kind of laws against gender identity based discrimination that it seems you'd like to see here in the US, beauticians would have to be waxing the balls of men who think they're women. It wouldn't be just letting people live their lives like anyone else. It would be forcing everyday people and businesses to accommodate the delusions of people who think they're the opposite sex.

Your only defense possible is to pretend I’m not talking about businesses being forced to accommodate “transgender” individuals when I obviously, absolutely am talking about that.

 

[BrownFlush]

Me being gay and oppositional towards religion that preach hate doesn’t give me the right to walk into the workplace and discriminate against the “faithful”(delusional).

Because someone doesn't agree with your perversion and speaks against it is not the definition of hate.

I’m just educating the ignorant

Maybe.
But, at least I'm smart enough to know where my dick should go.

You're such a whiney ass victim.

 

[Thebrownblob]

No your post is focused on individuals which have every right to refuse to do a job.
My post is focused on public accommodations which are not.

There is no federal public accommodation for any sexual orientation. So we are on an even plain. A business could technically kick me out if they don’t want straight people. Unless there’s some state law.

 

[El Correcto]

Your only defense possible is to pretend I’m not talking about businesses being forced to accommodate “transgender” individuals when I obviously, absolutely am talking about that.

You’re asking me if equal rights means that woman would have to shave tranny balls.
The answer is no, but if it is a public accommodation it needs to have someone on standby ready to wax those lady balls.