Leftists are so deep into a canyon of insanity that they can’t get back out of it quickly. I’m a previously pretty standard liberal standing on the edge of that canyon hoping they’ll be able to climb out of it eventually. In the meantime it’s just amazing to watch.
THE TRUMP 2024 THREAD
- Thread starter Wally
- Start date
Leftists are so deep into a canyon of insanity that they can’t get back out of it quickly. I’m a previously pretty standard liberal standing on the edge of that canyon hoping they’ll be able to climb out of it eventually. In the meantime it’s just amazing to watch.
UnionStrong
Sorry, but I don’t care anymore.
There’s nothing wrong with actual liberals. The barrier between center right and left was quite permeable, back in the day. Both parties were pro America, it was give an take. Now, the commies have hijacked the democrat party.
Doublestandards
Well-Known Member
The transgender lost that lawsuit
Thebrownblob
Well-Known Member
Claiming they have less civil rights because religion is protected in the constitution is pretty far-fetched. For that matter, apparently you don’t have your full civil rights @Box Ox because if I’m not mistaken, you said you’re an atheist.
Furthermore, saying they want to be protected and given accommodations while also saying they don’t want special privileges. They have the same civil rights you do as a straight white male who’s an atheist.
Thebrownblob
Well-Known Member
Correct this is leftism. It’s what was rejected on November 5. If it had been your late 90s early 2000s liberalism, it might not have been rejected.
Darmark7
Retired 2020. Not my Problem Anymore!
This is how someone with TDS thinks. This lady is losing her business of 22 years because her TDS got the best of her but she says she doesn’t care and she will go to work at a restaurant rather than serve Trump supporters. What does this dumb bitch think she will be doing at a restaurant?
www.thegatewaypundit.com
KARMA: Idaho Salon Owner Pays a Heavy Price After Making Disgusting Comments About President Trump and His Supporters (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Cullen Linebarger
A salon owner in heavily conservative Idaho is learning that insulting President Trump’s patriotic supporters comes at a steep cost.
www.thegatewaypundit.com
Indeed. Might not have been the case if they’d had civil rights protections against gender identity discrimination here in the US, eh?
UnionStrong
Sorry, but I don’t care anymore.
I know, that’s why I posted it. SMFH
Thebrownblob
Well-Known Member
You and your straight white Christian privilege And constitutionally protected rights!!
Doublestandards
Well-Known Member
Dems had the cheyneys up there endorsing Harris, she didn’t lose for being too liberal
UnionStrong
Sorry, but I don’t care anymore.
Damn it, you found me!
Thebrownblob
Well-Known Member
The Cheaneys are not conservatives, my friend they are, however, devil worshiping warmongers pretty ridiculous that they were embraced just shows how pathetic Kamala Harris campaign was
I think @Doublestandards is probably an actual liberal too. He’s proven that he knows what a woman is. Maybe we’ll eventually team up and make the Democrats great again. Or at least sane.
UnionStrong
Sorry, but I don’t care anymore.
Cheney’s….
Doublestandards
Well-Known Member
I like that all 3 of us have spelled their name differently lol
@UnionStrong spelling bee champion I just googled
If it's a private business then how is it a public accommodation? A public accommodation means you can't have "whites only" restrooms. That sort of thing. But we still have separate bathrooms for sexes. What you're wanting to do is completely change our culture. Make everyone interchangeable. You don't get to get your way on everything. If a man has been using facilities designated for men his entire life then he can continue to do so. He can't suddenly expect everyone else to change what they do to accommodate him. The only way I can see men getting to use women's restrooms, lockers, showers, etc is if they get the complete sex change. Remove his genitals, have a constructed vagina, shave off his Adam's Apple, take hormones to grow breasts, and deceive the women in those facilities. Until then these guys will have to stick to men's facilities.
El Correcto
god is dead
What wouldn’t have been the case?
A business providing services for the public would of had to accommodate a transgender person and have proper staffing to do so?
Oh the horror, those poor businesses.
Anyways.
So this is a jobs program for trans people? They are a tiny fraction of the population but you'd have every business out there which caters to the opposite sex have people on staff to be there just in case a trans person wants to be accomodated?
El Correcto
god is dead
“The tribunal also heard from a waxing expert who testified that waxing female versus male genitalia required different training, and that an untrained person attempting to wax someone's scrotum could seriously injure the client.
The legal advocacy organization Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms represented five of the aesthetician respondents.”
The ruling also found that Yaniv engaged in improper conduct by misleading the tribunal, by being untruthful, and by engaging in extortionate behaviour and scurrilous attacks.
“It was also noted that she brought most of her 15 complaints against women described as "not white," while expressing racial animosity on social media and in her testimony.
Yaniv was ordered to pay $2,000 to each of three respondents.”
Denying services based on what services you provide is not a form of discrimination. If a black person walked into a salon that doesn’t do the type of cut they are asking for, they can’t turn around a sue for denying the service.
The legal advocacy organization Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms represented five of the aesthetician respondents.”
The ruling also found that Yaniv engaged in improper conduct by misleading the tribunal, by being untruthful, and by engaging in extortionate behaviour and scurrilous attacks.
“It was also noted that she brought most of her 15 complaints against women described as "not white," while expressing racial animosity on social media and in her testimony.
Yaniv was ordered to pay $2,000 to each of three respondents.”
Denying services based on what services you provide is not a form of discrimination. If a black person walked into a salon that doesn’t do the type of cut they are asking for, they can’t turn around a sue for denying the service.
Exactly what are you wanting then?
