THE TRUMP 2024 THREAD

Box Ox

Well-Known Member
Hawaii judge needs to step in and stop this travesty at once...

Deported Brown University professor had photos of Hezbollah leaders on her phone, DOJ says

“On Thursday, a CBP officer interrogated Alawieh about her views of and potential ties to Hezbollah, a Lebanese political party and religious group that has been designated as a terrorist organization by the U.S. for more than two decades.

Asked about the photos and videos of Nasrallah and other leaders connected to Hezbollah, Alawieh said she’s apolitical and had the images because those leaders are revered by many Shia Muslims.

“So I have a lot of Whatsapp groups with families and friends who send them. So I am a Shia Muslim and he is a religious figure. He has a lot of teachings and he is highly regarded in the Shia community,” Alawieh said, according to the transcript filed in court Monday.”
 

UnionStrong

Sorry, but I don’t care anymore.

Deported Brown University professor had photos of Hezbollah leaders on her phone, DOJ says

“On Thursday, a CBP officer interrogated Alawieh about her views of and potential ties to Hezbollah, a Lebanese political party and religious group that has been designated as a terrorist organization by the U.S. for more than two decades.

Asked about the photos and videos of Nasrallah and other leaders connected to Hezbollah, Alawieh said she’s apolitical and had the images because those leaders are revered by many Shia Muslims.

“So I have a lot of Whatsapp groups with families and friends who send them. So I am a Shia Muslim and he is a religious figure. He has a lot of teachings and he is highly regarded in the Shia community,” Alawieh said, according to the transcript filed in court Monday.”
She gone
 

Next Day Err

Well-Known Member
View attachment 514623

When hundreds of unelected judges can dictate the functioning of Article II power of the executive branch, can issue non-stop, nationwide injunctions at will, when the Chief Executive has hiring and firing power over only 1% of the executive branch, you do not have an elected, representative government; you have a permanent, unaccountable bureaucracy protected by unchecked judiciary power.

This has been the arrangement of the American state since FDR, and the last president to challenge this arrangement found himself entrapped by a rogue intelligence agency operating extralegally which intentionally got caught in order to remove him from office in August 1974.

The next president who challenged this arrangement found himself falsely accused by a rogue intelligence agency (nominally but not actually under his authority) of colluding with a hostile foreign government, impeached, a highly contagious pathogen mysteriously escaped from a lab (nominally but not actually under his authority) and shut down a booming economy in an election year, then in the midst of this violent racial unrest was fomented by extremely well-funded, well-organized groups, largely from NGOs funded by USAID (which is nominally but not actually under his authority), and election laws were unconstitutionally changed by state secretaries of state, but the otherwise extremely active judiciary ready to pounce on anything they can stretch as wide as humanly possible to declare unconstitutional and issue an injunction refused to even hear arguments over black-and-white violations of the constitution.

The judiciary and the unelected permanent government must be destroyed if we are to have constitutional order in the United States of America.

THEY are the Constitutional Crisis, not the man the majority of Americans chose to finally defend their own and their nation’s collective interests.

Trump has to ignore their orders and possibly even do Abraham Lincoln type stuff if America is going to have a future.

Andrew Isker
Courts get the last say. Sorry.
 

Box Ox

Well-Known Member
View attachment 514623

When hundreds of unelected judges can dictate the functioning of Article II power of the executive branch, can issue non-stop, nationwide injunctions at will, when the Chief Executive has hiring and firing power over only 1% of the executive branch, you do not have an elected, representative government; you have a permanent, unaccountable bureaucracy protected by unchecked judiciary power.

This has been the arrangement of the American state since FDR, and the last president to challenge this arrangement found himself entrapped by a rogue intelligence agency operating extralegally which intentionally got caught in order to remove him from office in August 1974.

The next president who challenged this arrangement found himself falsely accused by a rogue intelligence agency (nominally but not actually under his authority) of colluding with a hostile foreign government, impeached, a highly contagious pathogen mysteriously escaped from a lab (nominally but not actually under his authority) and shut down a booming economy in an election year, then in the midst of this violent racial unrest was fomented by extremely well-funded, well-organized groups, largely from NGOs funded by USAID (which is nominally but not actually under his authority), and election laws were unconstitutionally changed by state secretaries of state, but the otherwise extremely active judiciary ready to pounce on anything they can stretch as wide as humanly possible to declare unconstitutional and issue an injunction refused to even hear arguments over black-and-white violations of the constitution.

The judiciary and the unelected permanent government must be destroyed if we are to have constitutional order in the United States of America.

THEY are the Constitutional Crisis, not the man the majority of Americans chose to finally defend their own and their nation’s collective interests.

Trump has to ignore their orders and possibly even do Abraham Lincoln type stuff if America is going to have a future.

Andrew Isker
Courts get the last say. Sorry.


March 18, 2025

“You called the judge’s order just earlier today, quote, ‘patently unlawful,’ and said that it was an assault on democracy itself. Does that mean that the administration is ignoring this order? And might you ignore future court orders that meet the criteria you laid out?” Hunt asked.

“The president of the United States and his administration reserve all rights under the Constitution to conduct national security operations in defense of the United States,” Miller replied. “The Alien Enemies Act, which was passed into law by the founding generation of this country, men like John Adams, was written explicitly to give the president the authority to repel an alien invasion of the United States. That is not something that a district court judge has any authority whatsoever to interfere with, to enjoin, to restrict, or to restrain in any way. You can read the law yourself. There’s not one clause in that law that makes it subject to judicial review, let alone district court review.”
 

El Correcto

god is dead

March 18, 2025

“You called the judge’s order just earlier today, quote, ‘patently unlawful,’ and said that it was an assault on democracy itself. Does that mean that the administration is ignoring this order? And might you ignore future court orders that meet the criteria you laid out?” Hunt asked.

“The president of the United States and his administration reserve all rights under the Constitution to conduct national security operations in defense of the United States,” Miller replied. “The Alien Enemies Act, which was passed into law by the founding generation of this country, men like John Adams, was written explicitly to give the president the authority to repel an alien invasion of the United States. That is not something that a district court judge has any authority whatsoever to interfere with, to enjoin, to restrict, or to restrain in any way. You can read the law yourself. There’s not one clause in that law that makes it subject to judicial review, let alone district court review.”
Saying a law/action by the executive isn’t up for judicial review is a ridiculous argument.
 

Thebrownblob

Well-Known Member
Are there any executive actions that a district court judge can’t stop for review?
The real question is are there any they can stop? And the answer is actually no. The judicial branch has no authority or power to stop it. They make rulings if they so choose, but it is up to the legislative branch to stop a president if they feel he’s not doing what he supposed to do.
 

Thebrownblob

Well-Known Member
Perhaps you and I would agree that what he was trying to do was wrong but I would agree with Joe Biden that he could’ve continued on as long as he wanted and nothing could’ve happened to him from the judicial branch. The legislative branch. would’ve had to impeach him. And possibly remove him if they felt necessary. They didn’t and they were never going to.
 

Darmark7

Retired 2020. Not my Problem Anymore!
Al Franken got the boot over far less.
I don’t know why you’re so delusional about this.

Al Franken was before that last 4 years (Biden & Harris). This is a new Democrat party. All Democrats were against pedos, drag queens with kids, illegals, men in women's sports and they even knew what a man and a woman was before you went along with the Biden administration and MSM the last 4 years. That is why the Dems lost. When a cult gets to crazy they will lose many of their followers. But the cult will always have some that will never leave no matter how crazy the crap they believe gets.
 

Thebrownblob

Well-Known Member
I never said Trump had to stop.
I just said it is absolutely up for judicial review.

If he gets a bad ruling after keeping going it could cost the tax payers a bundle.
I would agree with you on this. And also,in this instance, I believe Trump has more authority than Joe Biden had to continue doing what he did. Although I do not believe Joe Biden would’ve been impeached by his own party.
 
Top