Trump Shot!

[UnionStrong]

I would have said the same thing but as a Democrat some on here would have clutched their pearls and wailed about how horrible I am

I heard you’re pretty bad.

 

[Thebrownblob]

And then his sister was killed by trump.


It’s such a sad cycle. All that family will know is that their loved ones were killed by Americans. We think they’re terrorists and they probably think we’re the terrorists

I don’t know what the answer is

Hadn’t heard that do you have a link?

 

[Thebrownblob]

I heard you’re pretty bad.

@Turdferguson is all right my book.

 

[Box Ox]

And then his sister was killed by trump.


It’s such a sad cycle. All that family will know is that their loved ones were killed by Americans. We think they’re terrorists and they probably think we’re the terrorists

I don’t know what the answer is

Was his sister an American citizen too?

 

[newfie]

It’s a little hypocritical that the trump rallies and NRA doesn’t allow guns in their conventions, considering their response whenever there’s a mass shooting and their overall opinion about gun free zones

is it hypocritical? Even in a pro gun state i believe there are places you cant carry a weapon.

 

[newfie]

@Turdferguson is all right my book.

you going for the bitcoin or the hotdog?

 

[Doublestandards]

They always had it though. Not trying to be cynical I’m being honest. President can get away with almost anything. And if that doesn’t work, they can just pardon you or themselves.

Fair enough, although I don’t think it was always “guaranteed” since Nixon resigned and got pardoned

Genuinely asking, do you think they SHOULD have this type of immunity? You’ve mentioned the Obama case a few times, do you think it’s good he has immunity for that or should he be held responsible for situations like that?

Genuine question, naturally I think they shouldn’t be immune but maybe there’s sides to it im not seeing

 

[newfie]

Obama already crossed that bridge. He decided the guy was dangerous and he decided he should be dead no jury or judge necessary..

american taking up arms against american troops in a battle zone is fair game.

 

[Thebrownblob]

Fair enough, although I don’t think it was always “guaranteed” since Nixon resigned and got pardoned

Genuinely asking, do you think they SHOULD have this type of immunity? You’ve mentioned the Obama case a few times, do you think it’s good he has immunity for that or should he be held responsible for situations like that?

Genuine question, naturally I think they shouldn’t be immune but maybe there’s sides to it im not seeing

Reality is it doesn’t matter what I think should happen. They don’t ask me. They don’t ask any of us important questions like that.

 

[Pullman Brown]

Breaking News: In an unbelievable sign of unity and transparency the Zionist lobbyists have granted Benjamin Netanyahu to speak at both conventions: The topic: We control you all suckers! JK

 

[Doublestandards]

Hadn’t heard that do you have a link?

Eight-year-old American girl 'killed in Yemen raid approved by Trump' | Yemen | The Guardian

Anwar al-Awlaki’s daughter, Nawar, may have been fatally shot in intelligence operation on al-Qaida that left at least 14 people, including a US commando, dead

amp.theguardian.com

 

[newfie]

Reality is it doesn’t matter what I think should happen. They don’t ask me. They don’t ask any of us important questions like that.

until its time to vote. then they're all ears

 

[Doublestandards]

Was his sister an American citizen too?

Yes

 

[UnionStrong]

@Turdferguson is all right my book.

That’s what I meant. Lol

 

[Thebrownblob]

american taking up arms against american troops in a battle zone is fair game.

If you’re OK with that that’s fine. Seems a slippery slope to me, especially the way the Obama administration claimed they could do pretty much whatever they wanted.

“Not only does the administration claim to have sweeping power to target and kill U.S. citizens anywhere in the world, but it makes the extraordinary claim that the court has no role in reviewing that power or the legal standards that apply," said CCR Staff Attorney Pardiss Kebriaei, who presented arguments in the case. "The Supreme Court has repeatedly rejected the government's claim to an unchecked system of global detention, and the district court should similarly reject the administration's claim here to an unchecked system of global targeted killing."

Brownblob vacationing in a foreign country, we don’t like him. We can just say he took up arms against the military we can drone him and the courts can’t even argue it should not have happened.

Again, I’m not arguing I agree with with you about if it can or can’t happen obviously, I know it can. The people that just had a reality check on judgment from the Supreme Court are the ones I’m talking to. They just didn’t know it was like this..

 

[Doublestandards]

american taking up arms against american troops in a battle zone is fair game.

To be fair, the dad was a traitor to America as far as I understand, but @Thebrownblob is right that there was no evidence, at least that I know of, that the son had anything to do with any of that

 

[newfie]

If you’re OK with that that’s fine. Seems a slippery slope to me,

it is and it will be abused. i just don't know how you can expect american troops to add extra risk to their already difficult assignments by asking them to determine the nationality of an enemy combatant before engaging.

 

[Thebrownblob]

it is and it will be abused. i just don't know how you can expect american troops to add extra risk to their already difficult assignments by asking them to determine the nationality of an enemy combatant before engaging.

I understand and I appreciate your position. That makes sense.

And brownblob not going on vacation to foreign country anytime soon….. just in case

 

[Doublestandards]

If you’re OK with that that’s fine. Seems a slippery slope to me, especially the way the Obama administration claimed they could do pretty much whatever they wanted.

“Not only does the administration claim to have sweeping power to target and kill U.S. citizens anywhere in the world, but it makes the extraordinary claim that the court has no role in reviewing that power or the legal standards that apply," said CCR Staff Attorney Pardiss Kebriaei, who presented arguments in the case. "The Supreme Court has repeatedly rejected the government's claim to an unchecked system of global detention, and the district court should similarly reject the administration's claim here to an unchecked system of global targeted killing."

Brownblob vacationing in a foreign country, we don’t like him. We can just say he took up arms against the military we can drone him and the courts can’t even argue it should not have happened.

Again, I’m not arguing I agree with with you about if it can or can’t happen obviously, I know it can. The people that just had a reality check on judgment from the Supreme Court are the ones I’m talking to. They just didn’t know it was like this..

It’s a good point.

Americans are not allowed to travel to foreign countries for the purpose of having sex with minors, even if legal in that country

But apparently Americans can be murdered by Americans in foreign countries and American laws don’t apply

Would it still apply if it happened in America? Can the government drop a drone on American soil?

 

[Thebrownblob]

you going for the bitcoin or the hotdog?

Both if I’m lucky!