anonymous23456
Well-Known Member
It is like Active Duty vs National Guard/Reserve. PT car washer knows what I am talking about.
We have a winnerThe additional responsibilities of driving are worth quite a lot.
Yeah I’m in the process of suing him for impersonation.
Most do have a FT job along with a PT UPS job.Not how it works my friend
You want full time pay
Get a fulltime job
Thit's about the funniest thing you have said this year.Did he ever consider working full time is harder to work in part-time and that's why they get paid more?
Not just less but minimum wages vs. highest wages in the industry.Someone said:
"It's easy to find someone who can work full-time at UPS. Not nearly as easy for someone to make the part-time lifestyle work for them. Reliable, knowledgeable, experienced part-timers provide tremendous economic value to UPS. They should be paid accordingly."
UPS likes PT because they pay less.
Heard company offered $17.50, union wanted $25. Seems like $20 is an acceptable place to settle.I have it on a pretty solid source that the part time wages are the sticking point. The committee was afraid the full time vote totals would render the or with a sub standard contract.
I don't observe what every single part timer does at UPS, but judging who I am directly involved with which would be the preload.....the majority of them and the way they work deserve to be stuck at the 1990's wages of $8-9 an hour.I have it on a pretty solid source that the part time wages are the sticking point. The committee was afraid the full time vote totals would render the or with a sub standard contract.
Would the part-timers take $25 with cut benefits and pension? They can't have both.Heard company offered $17.50, union wanted $25. Seems like $20 is an acceptable place to settle.
Yup, as soon as Larry Fink gets fidgety enough about a possible strike he’ll make one phone call and it’ll be settled.Blackrock and Vanguard run this. Not management. Simple as that
LmaoWould the part-timers take $25 with cut benefits and pension? They can't have both.
It is like Active Duty vs National Guard/Reserve. PT car washer knows what I am talking about.
Imagine being forced to strike because these guys are demanding $25-$30.I have it on a pretty solid source that the part time wages are the sticking point. The committee was afraid the full time vote totals would render the or with a sub standard contract.
Thinking of scabbing?Imagine being forced to strike because these guys are demanding $25-$30.
Maybe if they'd have at least acted like they cared and bothered to ever vote come election or contract time instead of routinely abstaining, they perhaps could get closer to both.Lmao
Would the part-timers take $25 with cut benefits and pension? They can't have both.
I will without even blinking.Imagine being forced to strike because these guys are demanding $25-$30.