UpstateNYUPSer(Ret)
Well-Known Member
Wut ??
-Bug-
He must be talking about 8 hour requests.
Wut ??
-Bug-
Budget based on 40 hours @ my original wage of 18.50 an hour. It's been 6 years of 52+ hours. Yeah OT whores. Or smart whatever you think.
It's been 6 years of 52+ hours. Yeah OT whores. Or smart whatever you think.
that is exactly what he is saying. as soon as contract was ratified by the local, the pension fund sent out a ballot to vote to either give up last 2 contractual raises or our retirement age would be raised to 30 years of service and the age of 65 for a full retirement, if we wanted to give up the raises it would only be for age 55 and 30 years of service for full retirement. We voted to give up those future raises, which is exactly what hockey parent feels that since the fund cannot be saved by these future raises being given up he shouldn't have to make that sacrifice.Are you saying that your local had a vote and that the majority voted in favor of diverting the next two split raises to the pension?
Last year 2169 hours.
I know what I am. I don't need anyone to let me know. I asked for support for something, that is important to me. For future of UPS. The pension or lack their of is not going to affect me financially either way. If I can have my pension pay for my future electric bill I will be happy. I know how hard everyone works, for UPS. It would be nice to not just give it away. That's the bottom line. If your interested in relying on a failing system. You will be working again after ups.
Well I would hope that majority members would understand that if they saved their wage increases they'd be better off than just giving them away. "Shore Up" is not a guarantee. Putting your wage increase in the bank account for only them to touch. Is A guarantee.
that is exactly what he is saying. as soon as contract was ratified by the local, the pension fund sent out a ballot to vote to either give up last 2 contractual raises or our retirement age would be raised to 30 years of service and the age of 65 for a full retirement, if we wanted to give up the raises it would only be for age 55 and 30 years of service for full retirement. We voted to give up those future raises, which is exactly what hockey parent feels that since the fund cannot be saved by these future raises being given up he shouldn't have to make that sacrifice.
i'm saying that we were given another vote after the a through e vote with only 2 new options, as soon as ratification of contract (within days) we received a vote to take our last 2 raises for this contract. the a through e options are the raises we lost in the contract that expired in 2013.When we voted on possible pension rehabilitation plans we were given 5 choices, A through E.
So you are saying that since the pension fund has announced the 20/31/50 proposed cuts that you guys should get a "re-do" on the wage diversion vote?
Well I would hope that majority members would understand that if they saved their wage increases they'd be better off than just giving them away. "Shore Up" is not a guarantee. Putting your wage increase in the bank account for only them to touch. Is A guarantee.
I'm not sure what you mean by Teamster Dogs of War- Bug. Is that a threat? I've been worried about asking questions. Especially with the Teamsters. i shouldn't feel that way. I shouldn't feel worried about giving wage increases away without answers.