A) I am a moderate.
B) Political affiliation is irrelevant. What is relevant is where you get your information
C) I have all the time in the world for you you both post these 100’s of articles, and then also tell me what your point is by saying that 100’s of articles have been retracted in a time of major political and social distress?
The fact articles get retracted doesn’t mean a thing to your “cause”!!! Nothing!
So basically what you’re saying is, they want people to get the shot; and are steering physicians away from “alternative therapies”
Why does this surprise you at all? Why is this being used as some sort of “point?”
I’m gonna tell you a secret:
EVERYTHING GOOD IN YOUR LIFE.
Except for interpersonal relations
Is owned. Paid for. Bought.
Whatever you choose to like, indulge in, food, therapy, medicine, WHATEVER someone will find a way to profit off of it; and then take great measures to protect that profit.
This is the BASIS OF CAPITALISM!!!!
Just because they profit off of us; does not mean that we shouldn’t take the vaccine! You must not allow yourself to let go of ALL reason just because you don’t trust the world around you. I am skeptical too, man!!! Of everything. That’s just prudence.
There is a BIG difference between prudence, and sensationalism.
A. No you are not. You are so far left its hilarious you would think you are a moderate.
B. Absolutely right. If a source has been proven to be liars they cannot be trusted, ever.
C. Its literally in the link I posted. At the top of the NEJM link, there is in red text, "420 citing articles". You can click on that and the articles are listed there and you can click on those.
And the over 400 articles are NOT RETRACTED. Thats the point. It looks like those are legitimate studies, and unless someone digs through the source articles all the way back they wouldn't know that none of the data is legitimate.
And this right here "So basically what you’re saying is, they want people to get the shot; and are steering physicians away from “alternative therapies”
Why does this surprise you at all? Why is this being used as some sort of “point?”"
The clotshot, which got its name from the tens of thousands of reported clotting and cardiovascular issues its causing, is dangerous, ineffective to the point of being useless, and being forced upon people. The precedent it sets that you cant deny an experimental, useless injection is more dangerous than the glorified flu everyone is freaking out about.
It must be nice not to have to worry that the government or doctors might be lying to you, or trying to harm you. Black Americans know better, the Tuskegee experiments injecting black men with syphilis without informed consent are just one of many reasons why. Hispanic Americans know better, "La operation" sterilizing 1 in 3 of puerto rican women and being used as guinea pigs for birth control without informed consent are just a couple of the dozens of examples of reasons why. Native Americans know better, the forced sterilization of 1 in 4 native american women and smallpox blankets being a few of the many reasons why.
They (Government and Doctors) denied access to hospitals and barred women from employment in puerto rico unless they got "la operacion", basically a primitive hysterectomy.
All of these examples are from America and the people affected are still around. The examples worldwide are too many to count.