Not in this case. Too much evidence. Hang the one who survived right now.
What actual evidence have we been allowed to see? What we have so far have only come from "official source" who say they've seen the evidence and this is what it is. Even the governor himself uses an ad verecundiam while admitting he's not even been allowed to see a video tape of the younger brother placing the backpack prior to exploding. With all the CCTV and pictures taken, why have we seen none to my knowledge of the brothers leaving the area minus the backpacks? If such a photo exists, a major piece of evidence to support these 2 as having done what is alleged.
There is one of the younger brother post blast appearing to still have his backpack with him but is this a photo shop job? If this could be photo shopped, why are any of the rest (regardless the narrative) not also suspect in the same way?
Those brothers may well be guilty as hell and if so they deserve what they have coming to them but before we go down that road, let's look as much as possible not just to the front story but give pause and consider a possible
deeper back story as well. Why Chechnya? Why now? What might Chechnya, Russia and Syria have in common?
Who might benefit? What's been going on that
we haven't seen or considered?
What? Where? When? Why? How? Who?