climate catastrophe

Next Day Error

X - Other
Uh huh. And the sea level continues stubbornly refuse to rise more than the 2 mm per year that it has been rising since they started keeping track.
"Since they started keeping track." Except scientists know the long-term trend has been under 3mm and now it's rising at that rate, which is about twice as fast. Wrong again! Do you take a lot of pride in being wrong?
 
Last edited:

zubenelgenubi

I'm a star
"Since they started keeping track." Except scientists know the long-term trend has been under 3mm and now it's rising at that rate, which is about twice as fast. Wrong again! Do you take a lot of pride in being wrong?

Muh experts! This isn't even true. It took you hours to just make up something to post. Good job.
Climate scientists have adjusted for the changes in intensity, etc. of the sun.

Try again.

I heard them claim they have. But they still have to make up and use corrupted data.

Our entire lives are made better by peer-reviewed science and the engineering that follows.
Go get your booster. Lol. Then, take some drugs to deal with the side effects, then more drugs to deal with the side effects of those drugs, etc, etc, etc. Because Science!

Yet you guys want to cherrypick your favored conclusions and deny what's inconvenient to your fantastical worldview.
That's you projecting again. You don't even cherry pick, that's what your "experts" get paid to do. You just assume some random people aren't lying to you, and you have zero capability to confirm or question what they tell you.

Keep denying what you can't properly defend, that's ok.
I don't have to defend the thing I'm denying. I am utterly destroying all the lies and fallacies you use to defend your fantastical worldview. You can't even keep your statements straight. This is why you are so easily duped. Life must be pretty rough, anything I can do to help you understand what's really going on around you, I'm here for you. You shouldnot have to go through life being such an easy mark.
 

Non liberal

Well-Known Member
It's not confirmation bias when it's nearly every credentialed climatologist all looking at the same data and deriving a similar grim conclusion. Just like I don't challenge from my UPS truck the body of physicists who've come to the conclusion that gravity exists.
The greenhouse effect is real and we're contributing to it and thus changing the climate globally. Policy has to catch up. The energy industry finally gave up fighting the truth and yet you guys are still here stamping your feet like toddlers in the face of overwhelming evidence.
I wonder why?
 

Attachments

  • 8CE8F931-D83B-494E-BDC5-77DE0DF518A0.png
    8CE8F931-D83B-494E-BDC5-77DE0DF518A0.png
    1.1 MB · Views: 38

Next Day Error

X - Other
Climate scientist have adjusted to give the outcomes for whoever is paying for their science. Keep rubbing one out to the doom porn. It’s funny
That's not the way science works, longer term. There's a competition among climatologists and scientists in other fields to be responsible for breakthroughs in insight. There's a reason there's mass consensus among climate experts globally about this issue... because all the available data leads them all to the conclusions that even the oil industry begrudgingly acknowledges.
 

Thebrownblob

Well-Known Member
That's not the way science works, longer term. There's a competition among climatologists and scientists in other fields to be responsible for breakthroughs in insight. There's a reason there's mass consensus among climate experts globally about this issue... because all the available data leads them all to the conclusions that even the oil industry begrudgingly acknowledges.
Yeah sure you’re an every day error, now run along play the big boys are talking.
 

zubenelgenubi

I'm a star
That's not the way science works, longer term. There's a competition among climatologists and scientists in other fields to be responsible for breakthroughs in insight. There's a reason there's mass consensus among climate experts globally about this issue... because all the available data leads them all to the conclusions that even the oil industry begrudgingly acknowledges.

No it doesn't. They silence and censor the dissenting majority. You don't have to do that if you are confident in your results. Science isn't a competition, nor does it arrive at conclusions through a consensus. The more you keep pushing the lie that science is a matter of consensus (particularly the false consensus you keep referencing), the more you destroy your credibility. I'll gladly explain how it works if you'd like.
 

Non sequitur

Well-Known Member
That's not the way science works, longer term. There's a competition among climatologists and scientists in other fields to be responsible for breakthroughs in insight. There's a reason there's mass consensus among climate experts globally about this issue... because all the available data leads them all to the conclusions that even the oil industry begrudgingly acknowledges.

That's not the way science works, longer term. There's a competition among climatologists and scientists in other fields to be responsible for breakthroughs in insight. There's a reason there's mass consensus among climate experts globally about this issue... because all the available data leads them all to the conclusions that even the oil industry begrudgingly acknowledges.
If the central planners really believed in climate catastrophe, the moment Al Gore discovered it, picks and shovels would have been working on nuclear power.
 

Next Day Error

X - Other
No it doesn't. They silence and censor the dissenting majority. You don't have to do that if you are confident in your results. Science isn't a competition, nor does it arrive at conclusions through a consensus. The more you keep pushing the lie that science is a matter of consensus (particularly the false consensus you keep referencing), the more you destroy your credibility. I'll gladly explain how it works if you'd like.
Give me some evidence that climate scientists have been silenced or censored.

Science IS a competition, ultimately. Of course it is. Every human endeavor is. And I never said science arrives at its conclusions through consensus. Many thousands of climate experts arrived at their conclusions separately; their evidence point in the same direction. In other words, their findings agree with one another. Voilá, group consensus.

Science is a process that you seem to think revolves around your personal beliefs. Sorry, it doesn't.
 

Next Day Error

X - Other
Go get your booster. Lol. Then, take some drugs to deal with the side effects, then more drugs to deal with the side effects of those drugs, etc, etc, etc. Because Science!
Already took the booster. Lol. Then, I didn't need any drugs to deal with any side effects. Because science!

Everything around you and everything you interact with on a daily basis, whether you realize it or not, was engineered from the conclusions of some science, basic or complex. Have a little respect and humility.
 

rickyb

Well-Known Member
Already took the booster. Lol. Then, I didn't need any drugs to deal with any side effects. Because science!

Everything around you and everything you interact with on a daily basis, whether you realize it or not, was engineered from the conclusions of some science, basic or complex. Have a little respect and humility.
last i heard the covid shots are good
 

zubenelgenubi

I'm a star
Give me some evidence that climate scientists have been silenced or censored.
Here, let me Google that... oh, wait. Lol. I guess censorship is another concept that eludes your understanding.

Science IS a competition, ultimately. Of course it is.
Nope. You don't even understand what science is, fundamentally.

Every human endeavor is.
Not true. You just make up bizarre stuff, nonstop.

And I never said science arrives at its conclusions through consensus.
You keep repeating the lie that a some super majority of climate scientists agree, as though that proved anything, even if it were true. Stop changing your story. You

Many thousands of climate experts arrived at their conclusions separately; their evidence point in the same direction.
And many tens of thousands arrived at different conxlusi5ons, and their evidence doesn't point in the same direction.

In other words, their findings agree with one another. Voilá, group consensus.
Except that's a completely made up story for easily fooled rubes to keep repeating. It never happened, and you repeat it like it's gospel.

Science is a process that you seem to think revolves around your personal beliefs. Sorry, it doesn't.

Nope. You are the one who doesn't understand how science works. I'll be more than happy to explain it to you.
 
Last edited:
Top