Coronavirus

refineryworker05

Well-Known Member
Yes, it's up to the doctors.
And doctors are prescribing it.
You need to stop pushing your politicized anti science rhetoric. Shame on you.
Smh. Just delusional and wrong in the exact same way about the same disease for over a year now.


Calls to poison control centers about ivermectin exposures have risen dramatically, jumping fivefold over their baseline in July, according to C.D.C
. researchers, who cited data from the American Association of Poison Control Centers. Mississippi’s health department said earlier this month that 70 percent of recent calls to the state poison control center had come from people who ingested ivermectin from livestock supply stores.

Dr. Shawn Varney, a toxicologist and medical director for the South Texas Poison Center, said that in 2019 his center received 191 calls about exposure to ivermectin; so far this year the center has received 260 calls and is on pace to reach 390 by the end of the year. The vast majority of the recent calls came from people who took a veterinary product in an attempt to treat or prevent Covid-19.

A recent review of 14 ivermectin studies, with more than 1,600 participants, concluded that none provided evidence of the drug’s ability to prevent Covid, improve patient conditions or reduce mortality. Another 31 studies are still underway to test the drug.


“There is great interest in repurposing well-known inexpensive drugs such as ivermectin that are readily available as an oral tablet,” Maria Popp and Stephanie Weibel, the authors of the review, said in an email to The Times. “Even if these circumstances seem ideal, the results from the available clinical studies carried out so far cannot confirm the widely advertised benefits.”
 

refineryworker05

Well-Known Member
Yes, it's up to the doctors.
And doctors are prescribing it.
You need to stop pushing your politicized anti science rhetoric. Shame on you.
Smh. Just delusional and wrong in the exact same way about the same disease for over a year now.


Ivermectin compared to placebo or standard of care for inpatient COVID‐19 treatment

We are uncertain whether ivermectin compared to placebo or standard of care reduces or increases mortality (risk ratio (RR) 0.60, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.14 to 2.51; 2 studies, 185 participants; very low‐certainty evidence) and clinical worsening up to day 28 assessed as need for invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.11 to 2.59; 2 studies, 185 participants; very low‐certainty evidence) or need for supplemental oxygen (0 participants required supplemental oxygen; 1 study, 45 participants; very low‐certainty evidence), adverse events within 28 days (RR 1.21, 95% CI 0.50 to 2.97; 1 study, 152 participants; very low‐certainty evidence), and viral clearance at day seven (RR 1.82, 95% CI 0.51 to 6.48; 2 studies, 159 participants; very low‐certainty evidence). Ivermectin may have little or no effect compared to placebo or standard of care on clinical improvement up to 28 days


Authors' conclusions

Based on the current very low‐ to low‐certainty evidence, we are uncertain about the efficacy and safety of ivermectin used to treat or prevent COVID‐19. The completed studies are small and few are considered high quality. Several studies are underway that may produce clearer answers in review updates. Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19 outside of well‐designed randomized trials.
 

wilberforce15

Well-Known Member
Smh. Just delusional and wrong in the exact same way about the same disease for over a year now.


Calls to poison control centers about ivermectin exposures have risen dramatically, jumping fivefold over their baseline in July, according to C.D.C
. researchers, who cited data from the American Association of Poison Control Centers. Mississippi’s health department said earlier this month that 70 percent of recent calls to the state poison control center had come from people who ingested ivermectin from livestock supply stores.

Dr. Shawn Varney, a toxicologist and medical director for the South Texas Poison Center, said that in 2019 his center received 191 calls about exposure to ivermectin; so far this year the center has received 260 calls and is on pace to reach 390 by the end of the year. The vast majority of the recent calls came from people who took a veterinary product in an attempt to treat or prevent Covid-19.

A recent review of 14 ivermectin studies, with more than 1,600 participants, concluded that none provided evidence of the drug’s ability to prevent Covid, improve patient conditions or reduce mortality. Another 31 studies are still underway to test the drug.


“There is great interest in repurposing well-known inexpensive drugs such as ivermectin that are readily available as an oral tablet,” Maria Popp and Stephanie Weibel, the authors of the review, said in an email to The Times. “Even if these circumstances seem ideal, the results from the available clinical studies carried out so far cannot confirm the widely advertised benefits.”
You know that people are using horse paste because doctors won't do their jobs, right?

Doctors caused the poisonings.

Horse doses of anything send just about anyone to a hospital.
 

DriveInDriveOut

Inordinately Right
@refineryworker05, You're just delusional and wrong in the exact same way you're wrong about everything.

Prescriptions for ivermectin have seen a sharp rise in recent weeks, jumping to more than 88,000 per week in mid-August from a prepandemic baseline average of 3,600 per week, according to researchers from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
-New York Slimes

Like I said, doctors are prescribing it.
You need to stop politicizing science, it's shameful.
 

Analbumcover

ControlPkgs
Smh. Just delusional and wrong in the exact same way about the same disease for over a year now.

Notice how you never hear about Mexico during the pandemic?
 

refineryworker05

Well-Known Member

Notice how you never hear about Mexico during the pandemic?
This is bizarre. You are linking to an NIH article about ivectwhatever and yet RIGHT NOW the NIH does not recommend people take ivectwhatever for covid. What are you doing? That article is not enough evidence from the NIH, which wrote the article you are linking. Smh just delusional.
 

refineryworker05

Well-Known Member
You know that people are using horse paste because doctors won't do their jobs, right?

Doctors caused the poisonings.

Horse doses of anything send just about anyone to a hospital.
I feel badly for people who don't get vaccinated and get covid and feel panicked, but taking the horse version of invectwhatever while some of them refused to get vaccinated is irrational and delusional behavior. Smh.
 

Analbumcover

ControlPkgs
This is bizarre. You are linking to an NIH article about ivectwhatever and yet RIGHT NOW the NIH does not recommend people take ivectwhatever for covid. What are you doing? That article is not enough evidence from the NIH, which wrote the article you are linking. Smh just delusional.
The original article was published in the International Journal of Infectious Diseases and happened to be published in the National Library of Medicine as many studies are. The original studies were done with assistance from the Ministry of Health in one Mexican state., specifically Tlaxcala

It's not an NIH-sponsored study and is one of many studies done on multi-drug therapies in Mexico which show some early successes against COVID.

I never said its enough evidence, but it is worth looking at.

Loosen your mask, it's cutting off circulation to your brain.
 

brownman2075

Well-Known Member

Attachments

  • 92B3BFF4-EF9E-40E1-B752-7C514D4D4C70.jpeg
    92B3BFF4-EF9E-40E1-B752-7C514D4D4C70.jpeg
    31.3 KB · Views: 58
Top