So tell me why they're extending when the science doesn't support it?Eric tRump is that you?
So tell me why they're extending when the science doesn't support it?Eric tRump is that you?
Thanks for the new site ... I was going by the graphs I had saved last Monday and it showed 0 one day and 4 the next.Coronavirus death statistics in Georgia | 11alive.com
22 deaths per day!
https://www.ajc.com/news/latest-atl...covid-deaths-pass-600/rzbuoqjqbq3kvowiriiask/
Thurs 14th: 1,544 deaths
Fri 15th: 1,588 deaths
Sat 16th: 1,598 deaths
Mon 18th: 1,642 deaths
Friend that is not, "deaths have gone down to 3 or 4 a day."
So tell me why they're extending when the science doesn't support it?
That was from the evening's local news.As for the utilization %'s, after "half of doctors and nurses take hydroxychloroquine" and "3 or 4 a day." ........ We'll just leave it at that
I guess this explains why they took their graphs down ...Thanks for the new site ... I was going by the graphs I had saved last Monday and it showed 0 one day and 4 the next.
The GPH/DPH site COVID-19 Status Report Stopped showing the graphs of new cases and deaths.
Although the AJC says their source is the GPH, their graphs look different and deaths are way off.
Ah-Ha!
I found the explanation below in red.
I'll have to look into this deeper to understand whether or whose reports are more accurate.
In essence, the AJC takes the date on which the death was reported rather than when it occurred.
The number of deaths are greatly exaggerated in the AJC numbers and graphs.
On the other side, the GPH numbers and graphs are lower on the report date than actual.
Q: Why do the AJC’s charts look different from DPH's charts?
A: Recently, DPH has added trend charts to their site, “COVID-19 Cases over Time” and “Confirmed COVID Deaths over Time.” In those charts, as new reports come in, DPH allocates them to earlier dates, based on when symptoms developed; tests were taken or reported to the state; or deaths occurred.
Those two time-series charts are always going to show a downward trend because of the lag in when the data is reported. On May 1, for example, the chart of cases showed 21 news cases. Now the chart shows more than 600 for that date.
We believe showing running averages of cases and deaths, along with the day's latest data on new infections and deaths, is the most accurate and clear way to show trends over time. Many other organizations use this visualization.
This is how the AJC determines our daily count of new, confirmed cases: [Today's cumulative DPH case count] - [Yesterday's cumulative DPH case count] = Today's AJC daily count of new cases. We do the same for deaths.
Want to rethink that one?
Georgia's coronavirus data made reopening look safe. The numbers were a lie
Georgia’s Covid-19 cases aren’t declining as quickly as initial data suggested they were
Georgia’s rosy coronavirus data is a lie
Curve in Context: Here's what Florida, Georgia COVID-19 case curve looks like as of May 14
Seems to be some disagreement with you there!
Thank you for posting all those articles that show Georgia's numbers on the decline.Coronavirus death statistics in Georgia | 11alive.com
22 deaths per day!
https://www.ajc.com/news/latest-atl...covid-deaths-pass-600/rzbuoqjqbq3kvowiriiask/
Thurs 14th: 1,544 deaths
Fri 15th: 1,588 deaths
Sat 16th: 1,598 deaths
Mon 18th: 1,642 deaths
Friend that is not, "deaths have gone down to 3 or 4 a day."
As for the utilization %'s, after "half of doctors and nurses take hydroxychloroquine" and "3 or 4 a day." ........ We'll just leave it at that
His administration gives out guidelines, they don't order, and a number of Democrat governors aren't going by the guidelines. To quote Joe Biden, "come on man!"What are the guidelines put out BY the Fed for reopening????
How do you accuse the Governors of trying to "hurt" the president by doing what his administration has instructed?
Looking great in Georgia!
Not for President.She is not trump or Pence. That should be enough qualification.
Biden has fought a pandemic before. It did not go smoothly.When do we think a President Joe Biden would have shut down travel and closed borders in order to head off the virus?
She is not trump or Pence. That should be enough qualification.
Did you read the article? Sounds like the Obama administration followed the science and responded as well as possible. A stark contrast to the bumbling chaos of Trump.
Yes I did. Just throwing out different view points guy.Did you read the article? Sounds like the Obama administration followed the science and responded as well as possible. A stark contrast to the bumbling chaos of Trump.
“It had nothing to do with us doing anything right. It just had to do with luck. ” this was probably my favorite part thoughDid you read the article? Sounds like the Obama administration followed the science and responded as well as possible. A stark contrast to the bumbling chaos of Trump.
It’s a misleading headline. Considering you followed up with the crying lady meme I wouldn’t present yourself as objective.Yes I did. Just throwing out different view points guy.
It’s a misleading headline. Considering you followed up with the crying lady meme I wouldn’t present yourself as objective.
I think you’re making clear you didn’t read the article you posted. Why do right wingers take so much pride in ignorance?“It had nothing to do with us doing anything right. It just had to do with luck. ” this was probably my favorite part though
I think you’re making clear you didn’t read the article you posted. Why do right wingers take so much pride in ignorance?
After the disaster that trump has been, I think a Giraffe could be a better President. Just as long as it was born in this country.Not for President.
What disaster? Roaring economy until China let the Kung Flu loose on the world.After the disaster that trump has been, I think a Giraffe could be a better President. Just as long as it was born in this country.