guns

wayfair

swollen member
how has he tried? and PLEASE give us REAL examples not Fox News/Tea Party tripe

http://thegunwriter.blogs.heraldtri...hnikov-concern-aks-banned-by-executive-order/

According to a Presidential Executive Order issued Wednesday, the importation of AKs manufactured by the Kalashnikov Concern in Izhmash, Russia has been banned.

This includes the popular "Saiga" line of rifles and shotguns.

Mikhail Kalashnikov spent his life at the Izhmash firm.

The sanctions were taken because of Russia's aggression toward the Ukraine. Russian banks and energy companies were also targeted.

To be clear, the executive order does not affect Izhmash or Saiga firearms already in this country. This is not an "assault weapons" ban. Instead, it halts the importation of firearms from the Izhmash-based firm.

The news was released without fanfare, when the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) added Kalashnikov Concern and other Russian businesses to its "Specially Designated Nationals" or "SDN" sanctions list.

Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), according to its website, "administers and enforces economic and trade sanctions based on US foreign policy and national security goals against targeted foreign countries and regimes, terrorists, international narcotics traffickers, those engaged in activities related to the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, and other threats to the national security, foreign policy or economy of the United States. OFAC acts under Presidential national emergency powers, as well as authority granted by specific legislation, to impose controls on transactions and freeze assets under US jurisdiction. Many of the sanctions are based on United Nations and other international mandates, are multilateral in scope, and involve close cooperation with allied governments."

In essence, once the administration targets a foreign business or individual for sanctions, OFAC gets it done.

Once a foreign business or individual is added to OFAC's SDN list, their "assets are blocked and U.S. persons are generally prohibited from dealing with them."

There is no appeal.

In a statement on their website issued early Thursday, Kalashnikov Concern noted that the sanctions will hurt U.S. consumers.

"It should be noted that the production of 'Kalashnikov' in the U.S. enjoys high demand, pre-order products civilian three times the annual volume of deliveries. Thus, taken in relation to 'Kalashnikov' sanctions the U.S. government go against the interests of American consumers," the statement reads.

The firm is Russia's "largest producer of automatic and sniper combat arms, guided artillery shells, as well as a wide range of civil products - shotguns, sporting rifles, machines and tools."

It was founded in 1807, and exports arms and tools to 27 countries, including: USA, UK, Germany, Norway, Italy, Canada, Kazakhstan and Thailand.
 

728ups

All Trash No Trailer
http://thegunwriter.blogs.heraldtri...hnikov-concern-aks-banned-by-executive-order/

According to a Presidential Executive Order issued Wednesday, the importation of AKs manufactured by the Kalashnikov Concern in Izhmash, Russia has been banned.

This includes the popular "Saiga" line of rifles and shotguns.

Mikhail Kalashnikov spent his life at the Izhmash firm.

The sanctions were taken because of Russia's aggression toward the Ukraine. Russian banks and energy companies were also targeted.

To be clear, the executive order does not affect Izhmash or Saiga firearms already in this country. This is not an "assault weapons" ban. Instead, it halts the importation of firearms from the Izhmash-based firm.

The news was released without fanfare, when the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) added Kalashnikov Concern and other Russian businesses to its "Specially Designated Nationals" or "SDN" sanctions list.

Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), according to its website, "administers and enforces economic and trade sanctions based on US foreign policy and national security goals against targeted foreign countries and regimes, terrorists, international narcotics traffickers, those engaged in activities related to the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, and other threats to the national security, foreign policy or economy of the United States. OFAC acts under Presidential national emergency powers, as well as authority granted by specific legislation, to impose controls on transactions and freeze assets under US jurisdiction. Many of the sanctions are based on United Nations and other international mandates, are multilateral in scope, and involve close cooperation with allied governments."

In essence, once the administration targets a foreign business or individual for sanctions, OFAC gets it done.

Once a foreign business or individual is added to OFAC's SDN list, their "assets are blocked and U.S. persons are generally prohibited from dealing with them."

There is no appeal.

In a statement on their website issued early Thursday, Kalashnikov Concern noted that the sanctions will hurt U.S. consumers.

"It should be noted that the production of 'Kalashnikov' in the U.S. enjoys high demand, pre-order products civilian three times the annual volume of deliveries. Thus, taken in relation to 'Kalashnikov' sanctions the U.S. government go against the interests of American consumers," the statement reads.

The firm is Russia's "largest producer of automatic and sniper combat arms, guided artillery shells, as well as a wide range of civil products - shotguns, sporting rifles, machines and tools."

It was founded in 1807, and exports arms and tools to 27 countries, including: USA, UK, Germany, Norway, Italy, Canada, Kazakhstan and Thailand.
mate, nothing has been taken away,and Boycotting Russian Imports over the Ukrianian Situation seems a pretty reasonable thing to do
you must really do better than that
 

bbsam

Moderator
Staff member
I am assuming.... you are not familiar with the term "ammo fort".



If it wasn't for that boating accident....
I'm not. I just became familiar with the term "zero day". Edward Snowden is right. When the day comes that the US government insists that you give up your weapons, you will have a big choice to make. Nah, they won't break down your door, they'll blaze through your firewall.
 

wayfair

swollen member
mate, nothing has been taken away,and Boycotting Russian Imports over the Ukrianian Situation seems a pretty reasonable thing to do
you must really do better than that

how about if they ban oil imports, that would make a bigger statement don't ya think??

Saiga's and Izhmash rifles very collectible and very good shooters.
now because of this ban of new imports... gonna make some $$
 

bbsam

Moderator
Staff member
how about if they ban oil imports, that would make a bigger statement don't ya think??

Saiga's and Izhmash rifles very collectible and very good shooters.
now because of this ban of new imports... gonna make some $$
Maybe we don't import a lot of oil from Russia.
 

728ups

All Trash No Trailer
how about if they ban oil imports, that would make a bigger statement don't ya think??

Saiga's and Izhmash rifles very collectible and very good shooters.
now because of this ban of new imports... gonna make some $$
not allowing something into the country is CERTAINLY not the same thing as taking something away
if this is all you have you may as well admit you have nothing
 

The Other Side

Well-Known Troll
Troll
But not as thin as your understanding of the 2nd amendment.


Sent using BrownCafe App


I think what is "thin" is your understanding of the second amendment. The biggest proponent on this board for guns, could not himself explain the second amendment, without eliminating a COMMA, changing the second amendment into meaning something it doesnt.

DO you wish to take a shot at it?

TOS.
 

The Other Side

Well-Known Troll
Troll
Legislation has consequences.

Via NRO

Yet another storied firearms manufacturer is snubbing the Northeast. Frank Miniter explains over at Forbes:

America’s largest shotgun manufacturer, O.friend. Mossberg & Sons, Inc., decided not to expand in Connecticut. Sure it was founded there 1919 and still has its corporate headquarters in North Haven. But in 2013 Connecticut rushed through legislation to ban some of Mossberg’s popular products. As a result, Mossberg CEO, Iver Mossberg, says, “Investing in Texas was an easy decision. It’s a state that is not only committed to economic growth but also honors and respects the Second Amendment and the firearm freedoms it guarantees for our customers.”

Mossberg follows Remington Arms, Kahr Arms, Les Baer Custom, Lewis Machine & Tool, American Tactical Imports, Ruger, Colt, Stag Arms, PTR Industries, Magpul, and Beretta in moving operations out of anti-gun states.

They have to go where the idiots are quick to part with their money. Its just business.

Crack Dealers dont go to neighborhoods where its tough to peddle rock, do they?

TOS.
 

BigUnionGuy

Got the T-Shirt
When the day comes that the US government insists that you give up your weapons, you will have a big choice to make. Nah, they won't break down your door, they'll blaze through your firewall.

They have already "blazed" through you fire wall....

Your only hope is encryption.


Uh.... don't you know about the complex in Utah ??

A "server farm"..... for the express purpose, of mining internet data ??
 
Top