guns
- Thread starter moreluck
- Start date
Why dont you READ Thomas Jeffersons OWN WORDS inscribed on the halls of congress and you tell me what he is saying?
Since you midwest edjumacated gun toters think you are constitutional scholars..
TOS.
Well, it's not in the Constitution.Why dont you READ Thomas Jeffersons OWN WORDS inscribed on the halls of congress and you tell me what he is saying?
Since you midwest edjumacated gun toters think you are constitutional scholars..
TOS.
Overpaid Union Thug
Well-Known Member
Where in that statement does he support the grossly negligent and deliberate re interpretation of The Constitution or Bill of Rights? Your liberal scumbag buddies in SCOTUS and in the House and Senate aren't following Jefferson's words at all. The Constitution is able to be amended and there is a process in order to do so that liberals think they dont have to follow. It is a document that can be amended. Not reinterpretated on a whim. It's not the "living" document that liberals claim it to be.Why dont you READ Thomas Jeffersons OWN WORDS inscribed on the halls of congress and you tell me what he is saying?
Since you midwest edjumacated gun toters think you are constitutional scholars..
TOS.
BigUnionGuy
Got the T-Shirt
Don't you mean.... the "Library of Congress" ??
https://www.loc.gov/loc/walls/jeff1.html
If you post pics, a full view is better.
Is this a new liberal interpretation, of Jeffersons' words ?
Or, are they just grasping at straws ?
*** understand what Jefferson and the FOUNDERS intended for this country's direction.
NOTHING was to remain the same from day one.
Only in YOUR eyes, does the constitution prohibit changing with the times.
TOS.
Last edited by a moderator:
Don't you mean.... the "Library of Congress" ??
https://www.loc.gov/loc/walls/jeff1.html
If you post pics, a full view is better.
Is this a new liberal interpretation, of Jeffersons' words ?
Or, are they just grasping at straws ?
The words INTERPRET themselves you people.
TOS.
maybe the "hall" is in Vegas?
Overpaid Union Thug
Well-Known Member
Again..... amendments are possible. Reinterpreting or ignoring existing language on a whim to satisfy a trend is not SUPPOSED to be possible. The latter is what's happening. And not just SCOTUS.
realbrown1
Annoy a liberal today. Hit them with facts.
And there is a process put in the constitution to change it.
No one is arguing that you can't change it.
Good luck changing the 2nd.
If anything, we will get more gun rights, like open national carry and concealed carry, if anything changes.
About 80 million gun owners and 300 plus million guns say so.
BigUnionGuy
Got the T-Shirt
newfie
Well-Known Member
the judicial branch acting as the legislative branch would be a complete violation of the constitution not a modern accommodation.
newfie
Well-Known Member
realbrown1
Annoy a liberal today. Hit them with facts.
You like posting links that sort of, kind of, slant the story in your wanted direction.
Here is a link that has just the facts, and only the facts.
Sorry if it contradicts everything you think you know about guns and gun ownership in the USA.
http://americangunfacts.com/
newfie
Well-Known Member
constitution was not used to apply their decision.
realbrown1
Annoy a liberal today. Hit them with facts.
I am not saying is doesn't happen.
I am saying it shouldn't happen.
Over stepping their constitutional boundaries set up by our founding fathers.
And the founding fathers put into place remedies for the judiciary branch over stepping it's boundaries, just like they put into place remedies for if any branch of government over steps their boundaries.
Similar threads
