DriveInDriѵeOut
Inordinately Right
Ok thank you, that's what I was asking, for your source that the gun was in his lap and she was smoking a blunt.just what was reported...
she admitted to it...
Could you provide it?
Ok thank you, that's what I was asking, for your source that the gun was in his lap and she was smoking a blunt.just what was reported...
she admitted to it...
Ok thank you, that's what I was asking, for your source that the gun was in his lap and she was smoking a blunt.
Could you provide it?
I did, this is all I could find:look it up... google is your friend
Maybe someone should pull you over.sounds different when you're high or axed about it
why, I comply..... shall i say, I have yet to comply..... I'm law abiding... you?Maybe someone should pull you over.![]()
I'm law abiding too.why, I comply..... shall i say, I have yet to comply..... I'm law abiding... you?
The definition of "detachable" in California is that the magazine must require some sort of tool to remove. Since it is impossible to load an AR-15 magazine without removing it first, AR-15 owners who want a pistol grip or other cosmetic feature on their gun devised a work-around called a "bullet button" that allows the magazine to be removed by inserting the tip of a bullet (technically a tool) into the latch. Their other option, if they don't want to mess with a bullet button, is to remove the pistol grip or other cosmetic feature which then allows the use of conventional 10 round magazines. The presence, or lack of, a pistol grip or bayonet lug or a flash suppressor does nothing to increase "survivability" for the victims of a mass shooting. These are cosmetic features that do not affect the function or lethality of the gun. 5 shots to the chest with a pistol-gripped AR-15 will be just as rapid and just as deadly as the same 5 shots fired from an AR-15 with a hunting rifle stock.
If you are going to require "non detachable" magazines then what you are really wanting to do is to ban all semi-automatic guns because it is impossible to load a magazine without detaching it first. So please explain to me your plan for forcibly confiscating 150 million unregistered guns and 500-700 million unregistered detachable magazines from gun owners who do not want to give them up.
I guess she didn't admit it, but rather filmed itI did, this is all I could find:
Your logical fallacy is burden of proof
Could you provide a better one to clarify?
Virtually all modern semi-automatics cannot be loaded using stripper clips.If you are going to require "non detachable" magazines then what you are really wanting to do is to ban all semi-automatic guns because it is impossible to load a magazine without detaching it first.
- not exactly true. Stripper clips are used to reload a magazine which can be either fixed or detachable. Almost never seen on modern firearms but they do exist. One example would be the M-14.
For practical purposes you are correct though.
The difference between you and I is that I actually own guns and have a working knowledge of how they operate, whereas you appear to have learned everything you know about guns by watching "A-Team" on TV when you were a child.Again, you define what is wrong with gun owners.
You have time to figure out how to kill people instead of worrying about protecting your own home, which is suppose to be the intention of the gun.
IF there was 100 people in a building with a man shooting a pump action shotgun, the survivability goes up tremendously. The pumping action itself is a distraction and people could survive and overcome a suspect.
With an AR15 with a 100 round drum mag, people dont have that same chance.
You can argue all you want, if shotguns were that easy to use during a mass shooting, they would be used everytime, but we dont see that at all, and rather, we see assault style weapons like the SKS being used because of the HIGH CAPACITY MAGAZINES they can use.
What part of HIGH CAPACITY MAGAZINES dont you understand?
TOS.
My understanding is that he told the officer he had a gun and began reaching for his wallet before being told to, rather than keeping his hands on the wheel.So maybe it was a bad idea for the officer to ask for his ID then?
Ever smoke a ciggie with your kid in the car?Smoking pot in the car with a 4 year old in the backseat....I can't get past that little tidbit!
I'm against that too.Ever smoke a ciggie with your kid in the car?
Never smoked pot.......it was the 60's and someone had to take notes.Ever smoke a ciggie with your kid in the car?
Funny they're wearing different clothes. And I didn't see a gun in his lap.I guess she didn't admit it, but rather filmed it
You can argue all you want, if shotguns were that easy to use during a mass shooting, they would be used everytime, but we dont see that at all, and rather, we see assault style weapons like the SKS being used because of the HIGH CAPACITY MAGAZINES they can use.
What part of HIGH CAPACITY MAGAZINES dont you understand?
TOS.