island1fox
Well-Known Member
I posted my opinion of the change and the potential positives. Of course its only an opinion, just like yours and everyone else's. Time will tell.
My opinion is drawn from time I spent working in International. It was quite a while ago, but I was impressed at how much management concerned themselves with P&L. They questioned corporate dogma because they didn't want unnecessary cost. Sometime, the questioning was wrong, but I was struck by how much they truly managed to the bottom line.
We managed to SPORH, they managed to cost. I think that kind of thinking is good.
Regardless, the decision is made. I will do my best to make it successful.
P-Man
P-man,
Definitely want to make it clear -I was not attacking you --you are right everyone is entitled to their opinion . I was really responding to some other mgmt postings --basically saying they will be glad to be making more decisions. My humble opinion --we are not going back there.
Many hourly postings are saying goodbye to the "dead wood" --they have no idea how difficult and complex the Districts mgrs jobs are.
I was one of the International people that definitely managed by profit and loss--as I stated to you already -definitely made me a better person.
When some people say we manage by SPOR only --sure I would say that is a mistake ------but even here domestically --the last years I spent at UPS --we managed the BALANCED SCORECARD with spor being only one of the tracking elements ---bottom line --the BSC --was weighted toward profitability.
I believe with the twenty profit centers ---RPP vs CPP will rule.
I also believe a Profit Center District Manager will produce or will be gone----this will go down level by level --including the hourly.