Like it or not, that's what the CJOTUS decided a couple monthhs ago. If the government decides to tax you at %100, they have that right. It may be bad policy, but that is outside the perview of the court.
Oh, don't you know that is your president's goal, then government can do everything, just give Obama the chance. This is something that we can count on 100% then there will be no 1%. :0
Do you dispute the opinion given by the CJOTUS?
I think you should stick with your last statement. First of all when taxes are cut more $$ is available to the taxpayer and they can spend it, hire employees (more tax payers). It actually is not the same as tax cuts spur economic growth and therefore give the government more $$. Economics 101. Also what's so bad about the government reducing spending, it's about time for that!!!
How long does "trickle-down economics" have to fail before you stop spewing it's grade school level falacies?
Actually I detest the lying manipulation that came from the president who said it wasn't a tax. But I'm not surprised.
It is what it is. But the fact is, according to the CJOTUS, the government's authority to tax is absolute, so yeah, they are letting you keep some of it.
Talk about grade school antics, look at who's in the White house and we can't even get his grade school report cards... Anyway, trickle anything at this point would be better than prolonging the agony of perceived hope, a hope and a change that was another lie. We are the one's we've been waiting for...really!! LMAO!
It's been trickling--no flooding into corporate account for the last 4 years.
Corporations are hoarding their cash and running their operations cut to the bone because of uncertainty. When Romney/Ryan get elected the FLOOD GATES will open!
What does Paul Ryan not understand about this...or does he, Romney and the rest of the top right-wing power structure understand this exactly?
