Brownslave688
You want a toe? I can get you a toe.
I can't wait for Hoffa to Tell lawyers the line we hear all of the time from BA. Well that's what it says but that's not really what it means. LolYou're in the wrong section.
I can't wait for Hoffa to Tell lawyers the line we hear all of the time from BA. Well that's what it says but that's not really what it means. LolYou're in the wrong section.
You don't think there will be lawsuits and labor charges over this? I'd say that's pretty optimistic.
A dozen vp, tdu, 50,000+ members. Take your pick.I think it's pretty optimistic.... you think it's going to happen.
Who is leading the charge ?
You're in the wrong section.
A dozen vp
50,000+ members.
They posted numbers that weren't announced on the conference call?Umm...
It's seven.
Certainly, not a majority of the IBT executive board.
Do you realize.... TDU posting the preliminary results....
Undermined the entire process ?
Umm...
It's seven.
Certainly, not a majority of the IBT executive board.
Do you realize.... TDU posting the preliminary results....
Undermined the entire process ?
Obviously won’t matter unless it 50.1 percent....7 VPs out of how many? How many are there?
For the people questioning whether this was a final offer or not...
Don't you think the NNC would have kept on negotiating if they thought they could do better?
I'm sure there were many give and takes, and it looks like the Negotiating Committee saw that they could do no better, that UPS gave them their final offer, and would not budge on anything else, so they accepted it and sent it to us.
No.For the people questioning whether this was a final offer or not...
Don't you think the NNC would have kept on negotiating if they thought they could do better?
You were there? You must prefer the $15 drivers.lol no. They accepted this offer long before the deadline. They had strike authorization in their back pocket and chose to do nothing with it.
Ups never announced anything as their last, best, final as they did in 97. Why? Because they weren't pushed to make a final offer.
As soon as 22.4 were announced it was clear there was no way full timers were gonna vote this through. So instead of go back and say I'm sorry this just isn't gonna work the IBT decided to put the full court press on to get as many pt to vote as possible.
The IBT never intended to push ups to get the BEST offer they could. They got what they wanted. More pension money and more union dues. From there it was just a matter of how to get it thru.
lol no. They accepted this offer long before the deadline. They had strike authorization in their back pocket and chose to do nothing with it.
Ups never announced anything as their last, best, final as they did in 97. Why? Because they weren't pushed to make a final offer.
As soon as 22.4 were announced it was clear there was no way full timers were gonna vote this through. So instead of go back and say I'm sorry this just isn't gonna work the IBT decided to put the full court press on to get as many pt to vote as possible.
The IBT never intended to push ups to get the BEST offer they could. They got what they wanted. More pension money and more union dues. From there it was just a matter of how to get it thru.
No.
They don't know if they need to do better until the membership votes.
That section is specifically for final offers.That's not what the Constitution says.
When in the judgment of the negotiating committee the involved employer has made a final offer of settlement, such negotiating committee shall have the authority, with the approval of the General Executive Board, to conduct agreement ratification votes
And Hoffa is not undermining the vote?Do you realize.... TDU posting the preliminary results....
Undermined the entire process ?
Stop wasting your time trying to make sense to them. They believe in their own untruths and emoji charms.Let's do it again. It is in black and white. It says final offer.
Article XII CONTRACT RATIFICATION, WAGE SCALES, DISPUTES OVER JURISDICTION
Section 2(a). If a majority of the affiliated Local Unions vote to participate in area, multi‑area, national, multi employer, company wide, or industry wide negotiations for an area, multi‑area, national, multi‑employer, company wide, or industry wide agreement (hereinafter “master agreement”), all involved affiliated Local Unions shall comprise a multi‑union unit, be bound by such vote, must participate in such master agreement bargaining and shall be bound by the agreement approved as provided below. Upon completion of negotiations by any commit‑ tee designated as hereinafter set forth to engage in negotiations of a master agreement, such agreement shall be submitted to the membership involved in such negotiations for their approval or rejection as the final offer in accordance with Section 2(d) herein.
d(2) If less than half of the eligible members cast valid ballots, then a two thirds (2/3) vote of those voting shall be required to reject such final offer and to authorize a strike. The failure of such membership to reject the final offer and to authorize a strike as herein provided shall require the negotiating committee to accept such final offer or such additional provisions as can be negotiated by it
That section is specifically for final offers.
If this is absolutely the best the NNC could do in the economic times we are in.....then frankly they suck at negotiating.In your opinion.
Stop wasting your time trying to make sense to them. They believe in their own untruths and emoji charms.