I don't doubt your being truthful, but when you say they vote against something, you might want to mention what other package of garbage & waste was attached to bills containing these things you mention.
Can you in all honesty say that you have held yourself to that standard? Seems like it's a tactic of both sides. Same with trotting out "death panels". Nobody had time to read that bill, but they found that little (republican sponsored) nugget and twisted it to fit their fear mongering design.I don't doubt your being truthful, but when you say they vote against something, you might want to mention what other package of garbage & waste was attached to bills containing these things you mention.
I don't doubt your being truthful, but when you say they vote against something, you might want to mention what other package of garbage & waste was attached to bills containing these things you mention.
They are called "earmarks", not junk.
There is a difference between you giving us your opinion and you passing off what someone has forwarded to you (without verification) as "fact". For example, you posted that Obama dissed the Marines yet there is no evidence supporting your claim.
You need a hobby.
Unless of course, that IS her hobby!
I don't doubt your being truthful, but when you say they vote against something, you might want to mention what other package of garbage & waste was attached to bills containing these things you mention.
Lets clear some things up. If you do not want to read someones posts, put them on ignore.
If you disagree with someone, do it politely.
Dont think for one minute that you have the right to slam, or belittle someone.
Final.
Actually, earmarks represent about 1% of discretionary spending....Is it really about Earmarks (which both sides uitilizes) or republicans yearning for Obama's Waterloo in anticipation to recapture the WhiteHouse in 2012, even at the expense of our veterans families and 9/11 heros..
Agree, however, why exclude the consequences of posting false claims and portray them as fact.....This is a practise that frequently occurs in internet blogs, threads, and chain e-mails and should be dealt with a harsh dose of polite reality to whomever authors the post and is exposed....
Sarah Palin for example, why does she get thumped by commentators and political junkies ? Well making claims such as "Death Panels" and "Paling around with Terrorist" has it's consequenses with easy rebuttle and push back for the hopey-changey ex-Gov of Alaska...