If that's true then this whole thread is pointless, no?They say you can't really rate a President until he's out of office 50 years.
Only then can you "Get the big picture".
Who says that btw?
If that's true then this whole thread is pointless, no?They say you can't really rate a President until he's out of office 50 years.
Only then can you "Get the big picture".
Jimmy Carter has been labeled as the worst president ever but after just 3 years in office it, has Obama taken the trophy?
Obama Is Jimmy Carter 2.0
If that's true then this whole thread is pointless, no?
Aren't they all?
Who says that btw?
"They" do.
They say you can't really rate a President until he's out of office 50 years.
Only then can you "Get the big picture".
Who says that btw?
Reagan was questioned by another candidate about his age during one of his presidential debates in the 80s. So, he mentioned his opponent's lack of experience. His opponent backed off. The sad thin is that Obama was one of the most least qualified candidates to EVER run but he won. His performance so far correlates with that lack of experience.When Obama's qualifications were constantly questioned.......we asked, what's his experience. The questions were pshawed by Democrats and pushed aside with....."Look at the campaign he's running!" Great, he's a party-planner. Well, that's exactly what we got.
It's said that Obama has no experience and that may be true but then on the same level neither did George Washington if you wanted to be honest. At least George could claim how one has experience in a job never before had existed and a valid point. But back to Obama, you can still make the claim and even more interesting is the claim that Obama never created a private sector job or made a payroll and this again may be true. However, what so many people on bothsides of the political isle seem to forget...no, scratch that, ignore is the fact that surrounding Obama are captains of industry, leading capitalist if you will. These are the men who make free markets work right?
How is it then that we get state socialism ends by state capitalism means?