President Obama!

Just_another_day_at_work

Well-Known Member
Re: Obamabastic !!

Just another one of those guys that loves to tell us what is wrong, on and on, yet offers no solutions. What a waste of 11 minutes.
Np. Understood.
My solutions counting without NWO, religious, occult shills:
Monetary:

Put the FED under the Treasury, do full audit on it. Sound money (don't care if it's not gold) just don't counterfeit it and print it to infinity, stop monetizing the debt you can't solve a debt problem with more debt period. Raise retirement age, lower pensions. Stop the too big to fails, government subsidize for the same companies, if they fail including banks too bad that is business. If now we have 5 major banks failing again are we going to merge it into one? No fractional banking if you deposit one dollar, the banks cannot loan out 9 dollars on it. Will all this lead to some-kind of collapse, a crash or pain absolutely face it now then later. But people's grandchildren don't have to pay for our foolishness that we can continue on like this. And we can kind of restart the "system". Have a tax system for warmongers (high rate) and people who don't want wars outside of the USA (low rate). Balanced budget not a single penny over.

Foreign policy: Stop the BS war on terror, it's not working (if it even exist) kill one leader 10 more to replace, by bombing the countries only (will) do backlash. Pentagon shouldn't make advanced "liberation" plans for other countries and later serve it as oops it just happened and channel the propaganda on the corporate presstitues. Don't spread "freedom" in the middle east while limiting ours at home. There are a LOT of candidates for war-crimes at home. Countries like Syria or Iran DOES not represent a threat for us. Come home apologize for the families and the people who lost their love ones from our liberation overseas. Those ships next to Iran is for a reason, even though our president says he doesn't like warmongering and I "believe" him, just as what he did to Libya going to the (not our congress)UN for permission to bomb the hell out of them.
And when we start a possible WW3 how are we going to stop it?

Let me know what do you think and if you don't like some/most of my ideas please share what's your solution on it. Thanks.
 

klein

Für Meno :)
Re: Obamanomics

LOL, the source is the washington "moony" times!!

Who really cares ? Seems they have forgotten Bush. Ever since Clinton the US has never had an anual surplus.
But what would anyone expect with the lowest tax rates in over 50 years and fighting 2 wars ?
Besides having an aging population (baby boomers collecting SS and medicare), and nobody to pay for it with little to no taxes (just ask Romney).
 

moreluck

golden ticket member
Re: Obamanomics

Who really cares ? Seems they have forgotten Bush. Ever since Clinton the US has never had an anual surplus.
But what would anyone expect with the lowest tax rates in over 50 years and fighting 2 wars ?
Besides having an aging population (baby boomers collecting SS and medicare), and nobody to pay for it with little to no taxes (just ask Romney).

The government can have a surplus even if it has trillions in debt. You make surplus sound as if there wasn't any debt for Clinton and that would be wrong.
 

UpstateNYUPSer(Ret)

Well-Known Member
Burlington is just over the pond (Lake Champlain) from Plattsburgh. The visit had been hyped for weeks and by all accounts was a huge success. $5,100 is not a lot of money but it does leave a sour taste in voter's mouths.
 

moreluck

golden ticket member
omm8p.jpg
 

UPS Lifer

Well-Known Member
Re: Obamanomics

Expected jobs for March....203,000. Actual 120,000, the smallest amount for 6 months.

Retail jobs off 34,000.

164,000 folks just stopped looking....making the 8.2%. " It's a 'buzz kill' report ." (Liz Claman)

US Economy Adds 120G Jobs, Jobless Rate At 8.2 Percent | Fox News


The thread "Gas Prices" directly correlates to this. The number of jobs created will get worse as the ripple effect of high gas prices continues.

During the Clinton years, the prosperity we enjoyed was directly related to two leaders from oposite parties able to work with each other to do the CORRECT thing for the country. Let's not forget that Newt and the Republican party controlled the budget process and that Clinton realized that leading (and he was a leader) from the middle was the best way to move this country forward.
 

moreluck

golden ticket member
Re: Obamanomics

Every once in a while Carney seems to forget which lie he’s supposed to use.

Via Weekly Standard:

President Obama is traveling to Florida today to tout the so-called Buffett Rule, as well as to raise money from people who would have to pay more taxes under that same rule. The president’s proposal “asks everyone to pay their fair share” of taxes, according to the White House. In other words: It’s an increase on taxes for the rich.

“The Buffett Rule is [sic] simple principle that everyone should pay their fair share in taxes,” the White House explains. “No household making more than a $1 million should pay a smaller share of their income in taxes than middle-class families pay. For the 98 percent of American families who make less than $250,000, taxes should not go up.”

But the money that would be brought in by the government through this sort of tax increase would hardly reduce the growing federal debt. The debt is too large, and the revenue would be too small. Even Obama’s spokesman admitted that fact to reporters today on the plane ride down to Florida.

“[N]o one ever suggested that implementing the Buffett Rule would contribute in large measure to reducing the deficit,” said press secretary Jay Carney.

However, Obama’s own campaign team is touting the Buffett Rule as a way to pay down … the federal deficit.
“The Buffett Rule would reduce the deficit while helping to pay for investments in education, clean energy, jobs, and other programs that will help our economy grow,” Obama 2012 campaign manager Jim Messina claims on BarackObama.com.

And in another place on Obama’s campaign website, this assertion is made: “The Buffett Rule would require everyone to pay their fair share—a key step to reduce the deficit and invest in what we need to grow and strengthen the economy. Mitt Romney’s alternative is to give millionaires and billionaires trillions of dollars in tax breaks paid for by either increasing the deficit or by cutting programs critical to the middle class and economic growth.”
 

klein

Für Meno :)
Re: Obamanomics

Which goes along with todAYS headline here :

Canadians OK with higher taxes to fight inequality

CBC – 2 hours 25 minutes ago
 
Top