President Obama!

ImWaitingForTheDay

Annoy a conservative....Think for yourself
biden-munster-econ-n.jpg
How true..
 

Babagounj

Strength through joy
The problem is they don't understand the problem.
They've never seen a patient, emptied a bedpan, or changed a bed linen.
They'll always fail because they don't have the foggiest clue what it takes to care for someone who's sick.
They don't know what it costs to keep a medical practice going.
They haven't had to defend themselves from a frivolous lawsuit.
They don't know, and they don't care.
 

moreluck

golden ticket member
"Given Hoyer’s wording -- that when Bush came into office he "inherited" a $5.6 trillion surplus, we think a viewer would assume that it’s both a tangible figure, and that it refers to a specific point in time. In reality, it’s neither. It’s a projection of future surpluses, and it’s a figure that covers a 10-year period. In fact, the final two years of those surpluses wouldn’t even fall within Bush’s two terms in office......."

Bogus Claim – Bush wiped out the Clinton $5.6 trillion surplus in just two years | Bill Golden's Bill4DogCatcher.com
 

moreluck

golden ticket member
Via Washington Examiner:
Young people in 45 states will see their health insurance premiums increase under Obamacare because the law relies on the money they pay into the system to offset the cost of caring for older enrollees, according to a new study.

Virginia leads the pack, as individuals aged 27 and under will see their health insurance premiums jump by 252.5 percent — $416.55 — according to the Heritage Foundation’s Center for Data Analysis.

Virginians under the age of 50 will see their premiums jump by an even greater percentage, rising from $228 to $991.03.
 

DriveInDriveOut

Inordinately Right
"Given Hoyer’s wording -- that when Bush came into office he "inherited" a $5.6 trillion surplus, we think a viewer would assume that it’s both a tangible figure, and that it refers to a specific point in time. In reality, it’s neither. It’s a projection of future surpluses, and it’s a figure that covers a 10-year period. In fact, the final two years of those surpluses wouldn’t even fall within Bush’s two terms in office......."

Bogus Claim – Bush wiped out the Clinton $5.6 trillion surplus in just two years | Bill Golden's Bill4DogCatcher.com
From your link:
"As for debt hitting $10 trillion on Bush’s watch: $10,628,881,485,510.23 was the debt on President Bush’s last day in office. It was $5.727 trillion on the day he took office."

So he increased it by 5 trillion.... not exactly a good record either. Why would you vote for a democrat OR a republican? They both seem like pretty terrible options to me.... cue the lesser of two evils BS.
 

moreluck

golden ticket member
From your link:
"As for debt hitting $10 trillion on Bush’s watch: $10,628,881,485,510.23 was the debt on President Bush’s last day in office. It was $5.727 trillion on the day he took office."

So he increased it by 5 trillion.... not exactly a good record either. Why would you vote for a democrat OR a republican? They both seem like pretty terrible options to me.... cue the lesser of two evils BS.
So it was like $10.6 when Obama got in and it's $18 T. now. WOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Top