Sober the fact remains the company gave you some reasons they felt were good reasons as to why they did not do the modification.
You refused to accept those reasons and yet think I'm supposed to accept your excuses as to why you did not apply the same standard at home that you expected at work.
You're just digging your hole deeper with each post.
Incorrect.
The only reason the company has ever offered for refusing to upgrade to 3-point belts is that it is "against company policy" to modify the vehicle in any way.
Not only is this circular logic, but it is an untrue statement since the company has never had an issue with installing trailer hitches, DVR's, aftermarket seatbelts with Telematics sensors, etc.
We are not talking about modifying vehicles here. We are talking about installing factory-approved OEM belts into vehicles that were designed to accept them.
I am unaware of any further improvements that I could make to my daughters Volvo. It came equipped with the industry-standard 3 pt belts, airbags, and antilock brakes.
Unlike UPS, I did not have these features intentionally deleted. And unlike a 15 yr old UPS truck with a lap belt, the 15 yr old car I bought my daughter
far exceeds 2009 safety standards and OEM legal requirments for new cars. You could sell it as a new car today.
On the other hand it would be illegal to manufacture a 1989 package car today. They are only allowed on the road because they met the bare minumum standard for vehicles of that model year and are thus "grandfathered" in.
As I documented in another thread, the 1996 International P-1000's were designed from the factory with the mounting point for the 3 pt belt, but this feature was deleted up until the final day that it was legal for UPS to do so. The very next day, on the same assmbly line, they started bolting on the 3-pointers to comply with the law.
So again, we arent talking about "modifying" anything. We are only talking about restoring OEM features that were intentionally deleted, but which the vehicle was designed to have.