I freely admit I spread fake news but so do you and everyone else who regularly post in Current Events.Please don’t participate in the spread of ‘fake news’, lest someone label you a fake.
Wait, is it too late?
I would say @wkmac is more read on political on goings but he liked to get people spun up just as much as me.
I imagine your wife has that category sewn up.
Who's inferring?
Have you not watched Bret Baier on FOX? Not an opinion show.
I didn't defend paedophilia, just pointed out the definition being used was incorrect. You take things out of context, alter meanings, anything to try and slam someone. You make things up. You're generally just not a very nice guy. Worse than Brown Army, IWBF, Sportello, and Meat combined. Oh boo boo, you make me sad. You big meanie. Stop it, just stop it! I can't take it anymore. This is it Elizabeth, I'm coming! Not that kind of coming you perv.
Maybe you need to get to SF and have a talk with them.
I watched your video, maybe more Americans trust them because they are right.
the local news.
Let me make it simple for you with a question. Will Trump’s billion dollars worth of aid succeed in thwarting the Russian aggression? If the answer is no, then is it really an example of Trump being tough with the Russians?
That says more about you than Bret.
You especially post fake news ... that's why I like you.
Trump didn't try to escalate the war in Ukraine giving them offensive weapons. By design it's to limit further aggression. Putin is in eastern Ukraine for the same reasons he went into South Ossetia. To take territory that is primarily ethnic Russian, and to remind everyone in the region who is the dominant power. It's pretty much a given that the Donbass and Crimea are gone from Ukraine. But Putin risks major casualties if he goes further now that Ukraine has some teeth. And that doesn't play well at home after Afghanistan. I'll answer your question with a question..does Putin prefer Trump arming Ukraine, or does he prefer not arming them, as Obama refused to do?
Im announcing that I have to poop
It's hard news, not an opinion show, and when they have a roundtable discussion they aren't all conservatives, same with Chris Wallace. And you brought up another example of FOX News not being the polar opposite of MSNBC, Shepard Smith. And if you watch Tucker Carlson he brings on Democrat Congressmen and city councilmen and liberal professors every night to debate issues. It's nothing like how other channels operate and those who say it is aren't even watching. Now for all of you kool-aiders who think I'm drinking it, on Hannity the other night he kept bringing up the Uranium One deal. Knowing what I know from here I'd say I'm being lied to by Hannity. But knowing also from Hannity about the huge donation to the Clinton foundation as well as Bill's $500,000 speaking fee in Moscow from the same folks involved in the deal, I'd say the Clintons used their influence to make sure the deal went through. Might have been a bunch of agencies involved, but I bet amongst those 33,000 missing emails are a bunch of them strong arming people at those agencies, greasing the wheels to make it happen. So you may be right that none of the uranium went to Russia, but you can bet the Russians involved got very rich on the deal as well as many others in our government.
