bottomups
Bad Moon Risen'
I try not to lie. Just stating alternative facts.I think both of you are lying ... not that I care.
I try not to lie. Just stating alternative facts.I think both of you are lying ... not that I care.
Let’s skip semantics.
Is Germany ‘captive’ to Russia vis-a-vis the gas pipeline?
Simple question, yes or no.
You won’t answer.
, but if they couldn’t or wouldn’t, they’d survive.
.
MAGASo your argument is companies will come back so long as...we artificially raise the price of their goods (tariffs), allow them to pillage the environment (deregulation), and allow them to pay employees as little as they do in the 3rd world (lower labor costs)? Sounds like a great plan, what’s not to like?
Nope. Just noting the realities of the world today. A lot of regulation is just time consuming red tape. And with the cost of living in the States employees have to be paid much more than in the 3rd world. In order to be competitive with lower priced products coming from the 3rd world companies either have to pay less or the imports have to cost more. Meanwhile we have waves of immigrants coming in illegally who will work for less, suppressing wages. Trump has eliminated many regulations. Do you see the environment being degraded? Tell me, what would you do to improve the financial situation of millions of Americans? What Trump is doing is what a solution looks like. What's yours?So your argument is companies will come back so long as...we artificially raise the price of their goods (tariffs), allow them to pillage the environment (deregulation), and allow them to pay employees as little as they do in the 3rd world (lower labor costs)? Sounds like a great plan, what’s not to like?
So your argument is companies will come back so long as...we artificially raise the price of their goods (tariffs), allow them to pillage the environment (deregulation), and allow them to pay employees as little as they do in the 3rd world (lower labor costs)? Sounds like a great plan, what’s not to like?
No, much of it is redacted.
Have you read the parts not redacted?No, much of it is redacted.
Um, didn't I just tell you? And since the warrant used the Steele Dossier it's bogus. FBI even admitted they didn't verify the dossier before obtaining the warrant.Have you read the parts not redacted?
It didn’t only use the Steele dossier.Um, didn't I just tell you? And since the warrant used the Steele Dossier it's bogus. FBI even admitted they didn't verify the dossier before obtaining the warrant.
Did you read the part where the application for the FISA warrant really did outline that Steele was used as opposition research for a rival campaign?Um, didn't I just tell you? And since the warrant used the Steele Dossier it's bogus. FBI even admitted they didn't verify the dossier before obtaining the warrant.
The other document used the Steele dossier as it's basis also. The whole point is they went to FISA court for warrant that would enable them to spy on the Trump campaign. And it was all an attempt to bring Trump down. There's your tax dollars at work. When it happens to your preferred president don't come crying if y'all manage to sweep this all under the rug.It didn’t only use the Steele dossier.
They never told court that the dossier was funded by the Clinton campaign.Did you read the part where the application for the FISA warrant really did outline that Steele was used as opposition research for a rival campaign?
You’ve been lied to all along and even now you refuse the truth. Maybe Kellyanne can come along and spin another lie for you to devour.
Ummm. Yes. They did.They never told court that the dossier was funded by the Clinton campaign.
Um, no they didn't. And let's see what's redacted. Otherwise anything taken from the heavily redacted version can be woefully out of context.Ummm. Yes. They did.
Only a Russian agent would ask for that.Um, no they didn't. And let's see what's redacted. Otherwise anything taken from the heavily redacted version can be woefully out of context.
Out of context?!?Um, no they didn't. And let's see what's redacted. Otherwise anything taken from the heavily redacted version can be woefully out of context.